Skip Navigation
1.1K comments
  • In Denmark a MP from the Red-Green Alliance (a descendant of the Danish Communist Party and nominally committed to socialist revolution, although left-succdem and radlib in practice) has been condemned in the strongest terms, including by his own party leadership.

    His crime? Saying that Ukraine had "followed an inappropriate minority policy" in the years leading up to the war.

    These days in the imperial core you're not allowed to make any analysis of the situation, you're not allowed to question the NATO narrative, you're not allowed to criticize the western imperialists. Anything short of crying for Russian blood gets you labelled a Russian Putin-loving traitor.

  • This isn't a particularly original take, but America/NATO really is just a religion for a lot of people, huh? Like, domestically, most people recognize that America is deeply flawed and needs fixing, but as soon as that switches to international, every Gulf of Tonkin/WMD is forgotten and they gobble up whatever comically obvious propaganda is given.

  • I really, really hate how bloodthirsty everyone's gotten over this. People I knew to be mostly anti-war, or people who just a week ago were hoping this wouldn't go to war, are now salivating over the idea of an all out WW3. Like fucking begging for it to happen, eager and desperate to charge headlong into the possibility of the entire fucking world ending in nuclear hellfire, and it really does point to how war is just spectacle for them. These are people from the imperial core, so far removed from Europe, that they would never be touched by conventional war, and yet they're just fucking revved up for it.

    And of course, any suggestion of peace has the libs screaming about how APPEASEMENT DIDN'T WORK WITH HITLER or whatever, as if these are comparable (I'm sure they're not, but I don't know enough to say), and anything less than full bore, 100% support of Ukraine - even if it's 95% support, with an occasional side-eye at the propaganda like that laughable UN bit today - gets you piled on anywhere but here.

    I'm going full :doomer: here. I'm scared not just that there's a very real possibility of the world ending within the next few days to weeks, but that everyone I know is fully, completely, on board with either that, or nothing less than genociding all of Russia.

  • But an unlikely hero emerged in the spring of 2022 in Ukraine. A foreign volunteer from the popular western website reddit, named Kevin, going by his online user handle "Kevin1488HH" helped turned the tide in the battle for Kiev. To commemorate the hero, US speaker of the house Nancy Peolosi drafted a new law for aide to Ukraine named "Return To Tradition" after Kevin's favorite subreddit. :very-smart:

  • Broke: Russia has fucked up, this will bring Europe and the US closer together
    Woke: The US has fucked up, this will bring Russia and China closer together
    Bespoke: Azov has fucked up, this will bring Nazis and Satan closer together

  • Trying to do some self crit, realizing I've been kind of "rooting" for Russia. Despite thinking the invasion wouldn't come (and dealing with people who can't point to Russia, let alone Ukraine, on a map saying 'of course they were!' [Healthy media diet there] ) and then disapproving of it since, found myself hoping they take their goals quickly.

    Part is hoping for low casualties, pivoting to a multi polar world, Russia having legitimate grievances and finally 'snapping' after NATO provocations. Another is the too-online-brained hating the media, mainstream and social, building up a Ukraine that is not emblematic of anything worth supporting beyond sovereignty, and of course that it all plays into the hands of a reactionary project across the west that'll now find further bolstering.

    However, Russia is obviously not emblematic of anything worth supporting beyond being a counter weight to western hegemony, which is good, but they're not the USSR.

    So that said, while it's extremely unlikely, if Russia loses this, that's also a good outcome in that it's own project is blunted and hopefully Russians, following in the path of their ancestors when their country loses, force change. Obviously hoping for no nuclear option at any point for Putin. NATO and other like organizations are going to ramp up regardless, a Russian loss may make that less potent. As well, where they're fighting now may at least take out a good percentage of Azov and their supporters.

    Idk, I don't think it's likely, and still really just hoping it ends quickly. Russian victory isn't in leftist favor either, though it'll result in fascist deaths and smug posters eating crow. But damn. What shit living in interesting times is.

  • Excerpts from this article , shared in the last megathread:

    My second conclusion was that in an invasion, even one with air superiority, attacking forces would win ground at about 30km per day. Today, after three days of fighting, Russian forces advancing from Crimea have taken the Antonov bridge at Kherson, about 90 km from their starting positions. Forces moving north-east from Crimea towards Mariupol have also advanced about 90 km, as have forces advancing south from Belarus towards Kyiv, as have forces moving south from the LDNR towards Mariupol. The exception is found in forces advancing towards Kharkov, which appear to have slowed to invest and even penetrate the city.

    Just getting across Ukraine even if there wasn't a single soldier to stop them is going to take a couple weeks. Anybody claiming that Russia is losing because they haven't made "sufficient progress" yet has a case of goldfish brain. I've said this before, but the Gulf War, a war that is extremely renown for how fucking fast it was, with a coalition of a long list of the most powerful military forces on Earth, ganging up on a single nation, with no regard for civilian casualties, took 42 days to finish.

    The third step would be to keep Ukrainian casualties to the lowest level possible consistent with the steps one and two. The more Ukrainians that die the harder would it be for Mr Zelenskiy to agree a peace deal. In this context it is more informative to think about what Russian forces are NOT doing than about what they ARE doing. Even with effective air control Moscow is NOT:

    Bombing logistic flows from rear areas to the contact lines
    Cutting power and water supplies to Kyiv
    Destroying civil infrastructure (power, water, roads, bridges)
    Attacking civilians (video reportage shows civilians moving unharmed alongside and amongst Russian columns, and filming them with impunity)
    Attacking political institutions and politicians
    Attacking homes or offices (notwithstanding a small number of hits, probably in error)
    Cutting rail links to Europe
    Wholesale destruction of Ukrainian artillery units on the Donbas Line of Contact
    Sinking merchant shipping (though there are a handful of reports of blockading activity)
    Fighting its way into Kyiv’s urban areas where civilians would die in large numbers
    Using Russia’s complete air superiority and massive airborne strike power to kill Ukrainian soldiers wholesale on all five fronts.

  • Nuclear war is bad. Very bad. Don't get me wrong. But based on my research so far, it's more survivable than you think. The key to survival is realistic optimism and a positive mental attitude. In the meantime, here's how anyone can start food prep...

    Tweet

  • I've been getting shit like Radio Free Europe pop up in my YouTube feed for the first time ever. Also stuff like "Russians attack apartment complex" and just tons of stuff so outside what I ever normally watch.

  • Jesus Christ, mainstream TV news are running a fluff piece on the Ukrainian Volkssturm in Kiev. It's old guys who haven't touched a gun in 50 years and young morons saying that they'll "learn how to shoot in battle".

    These people are going to be so dead. It's horrible.

1074 comments