"yes - only child prostitute"
For ethical reasons
b
as opposed to a child prostitute who has siblings
Should move to Argentina, heard they're abolishing the age of consent.
I'm really hoping this is just some very dark humor
When I was in grad school, my advisor used to respond to any question that began "Imagine a possible world where.." by just stopping the questioner and saying *no, I'd rather not."
Imagine a world where you didn't have to listen to these stupid questions
Imagine the american president is 100 years old and dying of dementia. His last wish is one more genocide. Is it ethical for the Zionist Entity to do one?
Yes, but only if the genocide is of only the bourgeoisie
if i ever hear someone say the phrase "free speech" again I'm dunking their head in the toilet
“Imagine a possible world where someone said it ironically”
i am taking said imaginary liberal to the bathroom with me
sneerclub had a moratorium on threads about her because she posts like this with fulltime dedication
Too unsubtle about what the rest of the "grey tribe" wants.
I regret googling that. Thank you.
The infinite potential of the human mind and these fools are trying so hard to find justifiable ways to engage in csa.
The fantastical Singularity(tm) of eternal life and godlike superpowers must maintain 1950s
aesthetics, including the normalization of hurting children.
What if the world was made of chocolate pudding
What if the pudding consents though
It was already a really weird hypothetical, then it just got weirder. Why do they always have to make it weirder?
I suppose it's just what happens when your brain is uncucked and can finally unleash its full power.
Or something.
Reality has a radical bias so you can't really rely too heavily on it to argue for reactionary ideas. Instead they construct elaborate thought experiments and try to reason themselves into the position they want to arrive at from first principles. Being disingenuous jackasses that reasoning always ends up being deceptive and irrational.
Good point, a lot of the most hardcore "true believers" in this stuff are extremely good at rationalising their own shitty behaviour and making themselves feel like they've "figured it out" when all they really did was find a bunch of vaguely intelligent sounding excuses.
LSD and garden gnomes; not even once
Hypotheticals were a mistake.
:internet-delenda-est:
Suppose-
No.
Get a capital-R "Rationalist" talking long enough and they will eventually talk about any conceivable scenario where they think it might be okay to harm children.
If you frame it as “terms of a consensually signed contract” they’ll agree that just about anything is acceptable.
A look into the mind of a libertarian.
Imagining the Make A Wish employee tasked with arranging this
The stress of having to find a new guy because the last one killed himself in prison must be immense
Isn't this literally the plot of a curb your enthusiasm episode
Sorta happened on House too
Permanently Deleted
Stop posting Aella this is her whole thing
Argentinian congressional debates be like
ecks more like yucks
Yudcks.
How does one even come to formulate this kind of question? The 2nd choice is basically an answer, nvm.
Liberals justifying their ideology: Imagine this hypothetical situation that has not happened and, even if it does happen, will always remain a weird anecdotal outlying edgecase. In this situation, would you agree with me?
Leftists: Graphs
Once the congress of the youth wing of the far right libertarian party LA passed a resolution calling for the legalization of necrophilia and consensual cannibalism. Libertarians are freaks.
Terminal stage "don't tell me what to doooooooo" ideology.
interesting....looking into it....
