that goes remarkably hard given it's in a For Dummies book
I took him to mean that he was more interested in the discussion of policy and practice, not that he was discounting racism as a role in its virality.
Ugh, that poor lady. She asks a guy to stop filming and his first response is to go "The law doesn't forbid it so actually I'm cool and good" and oh Jesus it just gets worse
:quark: Act now and you too can have your very own peice of JD!
maybe glue them together into octogons? That's, like, nearly a circle. Flatworld priesthood, even.
so are they considering price-controls? Or did the right invent this themselves?
"Deplorable" is the kind of word you use to describe out-there behavior that clearly crosses some sort of line. Some guy in the checkout line talking too loud about Trump isn't deplorable, but he is weird. Deplorable would be chanting "Jews will not replace us".
If you ignore belief, ignore what people say and only look at what they do; then most people who vote republican live functionally identical lives to people who vote democrat. Most of them won't go to a rally in Charlottesville or the capital (that's your outliers, people really plugged-in and feeling strongly about spectacle-politics), but they will have slightly weird answer if you asked them about it. "Weird" describes more of them than "deplorable" ever could.
The octopi kinda freaked me out more than the slime mold. A mind that can take up a political position, probe the edges of reality, or come to a conclusion without ever really understanding what its doing... bugs me.
:erb-2:
I gotta say, I really love Avrana Kern. I'm a sucker for any story with AI, and oh man is there no other character quite like her. Usually you get either cold, calculating murder-machine or naive little blorbo. She's definitely not the latter, but she's not quite the former either. Like, she's got a truly galactic ego. No qualms assigning herself the title of God. Yet at the same time, god will come down and say, "Er, oops, my bad". Half of what goes wrong in the second book is because she's lonely and desperate to feel alive again, to the point where she's ignoring the more logical or tactical decision. That's so much not what we get from typical AI stories. The only other character that comes close is GLaDOS.
Anyway, I think you'll really like Children of Memory. It's more the first books speed and tone.
:garf-troll:
We are going on an adventure!
a few years ago, France made it illegal to say "podcast" on television or radio - they didn't like the English loaner word and insisted on "audio à la demande"
you can't call it cyber bullying in France, you have to say harcèlement à la demande
having a hobby is not antithetical behavior
neither is saving money
do what you gotta do
wow she read Huxley.
they're really desperate for something to stick like the couch thing
they really can't conceive of someone living a similar life to their own without being angry and hateful
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f354ee23-5492-4039-8c79-74efd0de76b5.png?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
>Not that anybody asked, but I think it's important to understand how shame and guilt actually work before you try to use it for good. > >It's a necessary emotion. There are reasons we have it. It makes everything so. much. worse. when you use it wrong. > >Shame and guilt are DE-motivators. They are meant to stop behavior, not promote it. You cannot, ever, in any meaningful way, guilt someone into doing good. You can only shame them into not doing bad. > >Let's say you're a parent and your kid is having issues. > >Swearing in class? Shame could work. You want them to stop it. Keep it in proportion, and it might help. (KEEP IT IN PROPORTION!!!) > >Not doing their homework? NO! STOP! NO NOT DO THAT! EVER! EVER! EVER! You want them to start to do their homework. Shaming them will have to opposite effect! You have demotivated them! They will double down on NOT doing it. Not because they are being oppositional, but because that's what shame does! > >You can't guilt people into building better habits, being more successful, or getting more involved. That requires encouragement. You need to motivate for that stuff! > >If you want it in a simple phrase: > >You can shame someone out of being a bad person, but you can't shame them into being a good person.
---
It was nice to see this put so clearly. This election cycle has left me exhausted and demotivated, and this hits it square on the head.
stolen from https://grungekitty-77.tumblr.com/post/754482938951892992/fun-fact-that-was-literally-what-inspired-me-to
![](https://lemdro.id/pictrs/image/9b67eaf7-8753-4333-9938-992c2b8329a2.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=512)
YouTube Video
Click to view this content.
It's such a cornerstone of theater, the music is so damn good. Somehow I expected it to be from like the 1800s
International Court of Justice says Israel’s policies in the occupied Palestinian territory amount to annexation.
![ICJ says Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory is illegal](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/0b7fcfe1-2fe5-46c3-8086-624161525328.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
>The court said Israel has no right to sovereignty of the territories, is violating international laws against acquiring territory by force and is impeding Palestinians’ right to self-determination. > >It said other nations were obliged not to “render aid or assistance in maintaining” Israel’s presence in the territory. It said Israel must end settlement construction immediately and existing settlements must be removed, according to a summary of the more than 80-page opinion read out by Salam.
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/097c3755-a765-4e32-a873-43b32c864b7d.png?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
written in the fucking 1970s
...really, we've not really incorporated it into our understanding of the natural world, either. The closest we got was the late 19th century project to justify the racism we were already doing (or "Social Darwinism", when it's attempting to appear grown-up and respectable).
The way we talk about class is still firmly grounded in 18th and 17th century ideas. An evolutionary perspective would have us thinking about this along multiple generations, across enough spans of time that the individual is incidental - a part contributing to a greater system. On this scale, it doesn't matter how good, how just, how longsighted this or that president or industry titan or """great man""" is, cus soon they'll be dead. Someone else moves in to take their position. It's the structure around them that truly continues, that defines the flow of history.
That kind of thinking is anathema to the US civic tradition. We are discouraged - in schools, in churches, on television, in our art - from such broad considerations. It doesn't matter that statistically most people here die in debt having worked all their lives -- they just didn't do enough willpower! So they must deserve their sorry plight! The Elect
, whether chosen by God or the Market (not much of a distinction, for a lot of people here...), are thus equally deserving of their 'success'.
Even our atheists think like this! They've just replaced 'God' with an Operating System. They belittle religion for projecting a familiar patriarchal figure into the great unknowns of the cosmos, then turn around, point to the sky, and say it must be a desktop interface. And non of the underlying assumptions change! The aesthetics and the words are different, but we're still trying to cram a planetary biosphere of billions of people down the throat of a framework that refuses to consider anything bigger than the individual!
(id look up the quote, but it's funner to butcher ideas and re-arrange them in new language)
i feel like that's not just the US as a nation state, but Yankee culture and society in general. Like, I'm starting to think we're just not capable of incorporating new experience into our collective learned behaviors. Not even after COVID - the polite thing isn't to mask up or even hand-sanitize when you have cold or flu symptoms, it's to pretend like nothing happened (and AIDS barely gets talked about and only in the past-tense...)
Most of the art and music and literature getting remixed remade and referenced is from the 20th century, or has roots beginning in that time. In terms of infrastructure, very little built this century seems to have any amount of longevity in mind.
Geopolitically we're still doing Cold Wars and proxy-conflicts -- even when those have been rendered obsolete by our own fucking actions the previous (and first...) time there was a big Cold War. And we never stopped funding and arming settler colonialism, even with practically unanimous condemnation in the UN (take away our VETO for the love of all things good TAKE IT AWAY)
i don't know that i have a conclusion for this. On a personal level, living in the 20th century US but having 21st century tech reminds me way too much of Fahrenheit 451. It's maddening. Like I'm trying not to notice the great big Amygdalae on the Healing Church; there's no outlet for the Insight so it's just hovering there and i'm scared to walk too close to it for fear of how others respond.
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/93256df5-5699-4328-af93-55553ec2c6be.jpeg?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
spam this at the /r/neoliberal dorks if you want
WASHINGTON—As part of an effort to ensure the benefits were only allocated to those in “true need,” a new federal law went into effect Thursday requiring all Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients to balance food on their nose until they receive the command to eat it. “There’s no reaso...
![New Law Requires SNAP Recipients To Balance Food On Nose Until Receiving Command To Eat It](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/fcb7c03f-2a48-435f-bcad-5915cf878ae3.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/10384011
> read more: https://www.theonion.com/new-law-requires-snap-recipients-to-balance-food-on-nos-1851278899
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/19cca24c-d6ce-4f37-b8ce-963dda1c8caf.jpeg?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
https://www.tumblr.com/trekheritageposts/696297078878568448/star-trek-heritage-post-july-6th-2022
saw some good friends. Lost my marbles, caught them. touched some tree stumps. Looked at a redwood and saw the past looking back at me. took pictures with both types of cameras, talked, listened. Cried shuddered wailed all quietly to myself.
got back this morning heard some news.
i am FUCKING steamed
🎵♪🗒️ new News old, new News old, I've heard this one all before -- this young man skipped spring and went straight to simmer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp8znvfYbow
I think it's kinda interesting that there's a whole universal force that kinda goes uncommented upon in popular physics. I also don't know anything about the strong nuclear force, but I heard someone say once that it's actually just electromagnetism on a small scale? If there was, like, a good documentary that centers the history and experiments that lead researchers to conclude the existence of these things, that would be helpful. Being able to situate research in historical context really goes a long way to getting my head around a concept.