Scary AT&T breach leaks up to 70 million Social Security numbers to the dark web
Scary AT&T breach leaks up to 70 million Social Security numbers to the dark web
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13810367
I have been informed my SSN, DOB, and payment information have been "compromised" at least 50 times in my life.
Just keep your credit frozen
Fight Club had it backwards. Instead of attacking the banks to wipe out people’s credit someone should release everyone’s SSN. The mass fraud will make credit useless.
Isn't 70 million like 1/4 anyway?
Between this Anthem, Target, and OPM, it seems likely that most Americans have their SSN out there for criminals to buy.
Let's evolve, let the chips fall where they may.
This is brilliant. The government could put out a searchable database.
You first. Feel free to post it here.
420-69-8008
It's almost like the gov should replace the SSN system with something that addresses modern security concerns.
But then I can't google my number when I forget.
Like fingerprints
Oh wait...
The SSA should just set a time limit, (let’s say 3 years,) and then publish a database of every single name, DOB, and SSN. Force the banks to figure out a new system of identification, by making the current system useless.
The current system is already insecure; SSNs were never intended to be secure. So why has the SSA tolerated this for so long? Just make the “in three years we’ll publish this live database for anyone to search” announcement, so banks are forced to develop a better system. It gives them the time to work on a new system, eliminates the need to keep SSNs secret, and the SSA can keep operating as normal.
This is one of those ideas I'd love to agree with, but I know the reality of the situation would mean negative consequences for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged, just like how current ID systems are now.
Granted: needs an implanted microchip connected via Bluetooth to a phone app to work properly.
I have so much "free credit monitoring" from data breaches, I could leave it to my grandkids and they'd be set for life.
I keep reading "social security number", but still don't understand why it's possible to steal a person's identity with their SSN. Is that all that's required for identification? Some number?
Basically. It wasn't meant to act as an identification, but people kept using it that way (probably because every citizen gets one at birth, so it's the easiest proof of citizenship).
It's a key component. You need other information, but the SSN is supposed to be secret.
State-assigned unchangeable passwords that you hand out to 20-100 companies throughout your life (every job, every loan, every credit card, every financial account, every background check, every...)
This was 70 million people in 1 breach.
Keep in mind there are only 340 million people in the US, many of which are under 18.
We need a better system.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Personnel_Management_data_breach
The Office of Personnel Management data breach was a 2015 data breach targeting Standard Form 86 (SF-86) U.S. government security clearance records retained by the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM). One of the largest breaches of government data in U.S. history, the attack was carried out by an advanced persistent threat based in China, widely believed to be the Jiangsu State Security Department, a subsidiary of the Government of China's Ministry of State Security spy agency.
In June 2015, OPM announced that it had been the target of a data breach targeting personnel records.[1] Approximately 22.1 million records were affected, including records related to government employees, other people who had undergone background checks, and their friends and family.[2][3] One of the largest breaches of government data in U.S. history,[1] information that was obtained and exfiltrated in the breach[4] included personally identifiable information such as Social Security numbers,[5] as well as names, dates and places of birth, and addresses.[6] State-sponsored hackers working on behalf of the Chinese government carried out the attack.[4][7]
The data breach consisted of two separate, but linked, attacks.[8] It is unclear when the first attack occurred but the second attack happened on May 7, 2014, when attackers posed as an employee of KeyPoint Government Solutions, a subcontracting company. The first attack was discovered March 20, 2014, but the second attack was not discovered until April 15, 2015.[8] In the aftermath of the event, Katherine Archuleta, the director of OPM, and the CIO, Donna Seymour, resigned.[9]
Getting names, emails, addresses, etc is pretty available. If you can link those up + an SSN you can open accounts pretty easily
Damn... that seems like a pretty bad system. Have there not been attempts to remedy that?
Mine is 075-21-9556 in case anyone wants it.
Hey, wait a minute! That one's mine, too!
I have your IP and your SSN
Hands up
Glad that you guys think that you're so bold but why don't you post this in hacker forums instead?
I have a T shirt with it on the back in large font.
Compensations should be paid out, watch how security grows
and this is why i refused to give you my social back when i lived in your service area and had a land line installed.
Is there any way we could do some sort of certificate based authentication? Instead of a social security number. I know people get really dodgy whenever you talk about ways to identify them but there has to be a better way than this.
Identity fraud can ruin your life permanently and at this point I'm pretty sure more people have been compromised than haven't.
Bill Gates has been trying for awhile.
World coin!
(Not really world coin is a terrible idea)
Something like a ssh key or what they are now calling passkeys could work. The question is then who holds the verification database and how do individuals (especially those who can't turn on their pc) keep their part of the key safe and do we also have some other kind of verification questions like we do now to make sure that it's the right person when so many small details are shared or similar across people.
Will there be consequences??
SSNs are not secure and were never intended to be used that way. Just because companies misuse it for security to cut costs and apply credit ratings we never voted for doesn't mean we should necessarily punish someone for leaking that data that is already like 99% public data because of all the previous leaks. It would be better if everyone treated it as public data and not some secret identity key. They should be punished for poor security and fix their shit, but SSNs are not private, not intended to be used for identity, and not secure.
Everyone's data is now public knowledge
This was probably orchestrated on purpose as part of a long term operation
The goal would be to make things like this happen over and over and over again so as to eventually get people outraged enough so that they can push for everyone to get on board with CBDCs, forced nerulink implants, digital identity like the EU, and basically anything that helps the government make you a total slave to surveillance and tracking
It's another one of those, "it's for your safety!!!!!!" deals
Or maybe they just need to practice better security. Never assume malice when something can be explained with inconfidence.
To be fair the threat actors are getting much harder to defend against
People must learn to open their eyes. We already know that the government, big tech, and corporations lie all the time. Yet somehow, when I suggest that they are lying, I get told off?? Give me a break.
I am not assuming, more or less just strongly suggesting. There is a major benefit to the larger agenda here.
Anyway I'm not frustrated at you, just majority of so-called privacy people who can't see a bigger picture. Same kind of people that would have torn you to shreds for suggesting some things pre-2014 that Snowden later revealed to be true. Somehow we forgotten about him.
Why exactly did a telecom company need SSNs anyway?
Edited to add, this was a rhetorical question and more a comment on the awful series of systems in the USA that leads a SSN to be used by telecom companies.
To collaborate more effectively with the NSA and CIA.
Oh, so that explains where the cocaine comes from.
Credit checks.
Nowadays they offer financing for devices. But even in the past it was required. They would determine the maximum number of lines you had available, and if there were any deposits to open new lines of service. Even before phone financing, those phone contracts came with hundreds of dollars of phone discounts at time of purchase and had hundreds of dollars worth of early termination fees and they want to make sure their customers had a good chance of paying if they left.
Antifraud
Most people get suckered into signing a contract and using a "postpaid" plan, where you get the service for a month and then pay for it. That requires a credit check and credit reporting, since you get the service before payment. You don't have to give out your SSN if you sign up for "prepaid" cell phone plans, which offer less discounts and benefits but are generally cheaper for the service they provide. The only catch is you pay for the month before you use it, but this makes canceling as easy as stopping payment.
I'm on a prepaid plan, and got in on a really good deal. They were offering $25/month off indefinitely for signing up for auto-pay (Basically 35% off, lol). It made the plan cheaper and better than most of their monthly plans. I'm happy to know it also saved me from giving out my SSN.
Problem is all prepaid plans are MVNOs that throttle speeds
I think it's related maybe to some anti terrorism law? In certain EU countries for example it's impossible to get an anonymous SIM due to some anti terrorism legislation. SSNs are the only legal identification I guess?
This is a random guess off the top of my head. IANAL or know anything specific on US law.
SSN isn't supposed to be used as a form of ID. Even says so on an SS card.
What's IANAL? Is it some new Apple product I don't know about yet?
To run credit checks and be in compliance with anti-terrorism regulations.
But there's no need to store them in what I assume to be plain text, this is negligence
It could be worse, companies could be asking for phones and then treating them as a SSN. Oh wait....