Sukhoi Su-57 - New General Megathread for the 1st-3rd of November 2024
The Sukhoi Su-57 is a twin-engine stealth multirole fighter aircraft developed by Sukhoi. It is the product of the PAK FA (Russian: ПАК ФА, prospective aeronautical complex of front-line aviation) programme, which was initiated in 1999 as a more modern and affordable alternative to the MFI (Mikoyan Project 1.44/1.42). Sukhoi's internal designation for the aircraft is T-50. The Su-57 is the first aircraft in Russian military service designed with stealth technology and is intended to be the basis for a family of stealth combat aircraft.
A multirole fighter capable of aerial combat as well as ground and maritime strike, the Su-57 incorporates stealth, supermaneuverability, supercruise, integrated avionics and large payload capacity. The aircraft is expected to succeed the MiG-29 and Su-27 in the Russian military service and has also been marketed for export.
After repeated delays, the first Su-57 entered service with the Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) in December 2020.
Origins
In 1979, the Soviet Union outlined a need for next-generation fighter aircraft intended to enter service in the 1990s. The programme became the I-90 (Russian: И-90, short for: Истребитель 1990–х годов, lit. 'Fighter of the 1990s') and required the fighter to be "multifunctional" (i.e. multirole) by having substantial ground attack capabilities, and would eventually replace the MiG-29 and Su-27 in frontline tactical aviation service.
Though not a participant in the MFI, Sukhoi started its own programme in 1983 to develop technologies for a next-generation fighter, eventually resulting in the forward-swept wing S-32 experimental aircraft, later redesignated S-37 and then Su-47.
Due to a lack of funds after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the MFI was repeatedly delayed and the first flight of the MiG 1.44/1.42 prototype did not occur until 2000, nine years behind schedule.
Because of Russia's financial difficulties, the programme aimed to rein in costs by producing a single multirole fifth-generation fighter that would replace both the Su-27 and the MiG-29. Further cost-saving measures include an intended size in between that of the Su-27 and the MiG-29 and normal takeoff weight considerably smaller than the MiG MFI's 28.6 tonnes (63,000 lb) and the Su-47's 26.8 tonnes (59,000 lb).
In April 2002, the Ministry of Defence selected Sukhoi over Mikoyan as the winner of the PAK FA competition and the lead design bureau of the new aircraft. In addition to the merits of the proposal, Sukhoi's experience in the 1990s was taken into account, with the successful development of various Su-27 derivatives and numerous exports ensuring its financial stability.
Design
The Su-57 is a fifth-generation multirole fighter aircraft and the first operational stealth aircraft for the Russian armed forces. In addition to stealth, the fighter emphasizes supermaneuverability in all aircraft axes, capacious internal payload bays for multirole versatility, and advanced sensor systems such as active phased-array radar as well as the integration of these systems to achieve high levels of automation
The aircraft has a wide blended wing body fuselage with two widely spaced engines and has all-moving horizontal and vertical stabilisers, with the vertical stabilisers canted for stealth; the trapezoid wings have leading edge flaps, ailerons, and flaperons. The aircraft incorporates thrust vectoring and large leading edge root extensions that shift the aerodynamic center forward, increasing static instability and maneuverability.
Designed from the outset as a multirole aircraft, the Su-57 has substantial internal payload capacity that allows the carriage of multiple large air-to-surface ordnance. Weapons are housed in two tandem main weapons bays in the large ventral volume between the widely spaced engine nacelles and smaller side bays with bulged triangular-section fairings near the wing root.
The first aircraft in Russian military service to emphasize stealth, the Su-57 employs a variety of methods to reduce its radar signature. Similar to other stealth fighters such as the F-22, the aircraft aligns the planform edges to reduce its radar cross-section (RCS); the leading and trailing edges of the wings and control surfaces and the serrated edges of skin panels are carefully angled to reduce the number of directions the radar waves can be reflected. Weapons are carried internally in weapons bays within the airframe and antennas are recessed from the surface of the skin to preserve the aircraft's stealthy shape, while radar absorbent material (RAM) coatings absorb radar emissions and reduce the reflection back to the source.
As with other stealth fighters, the Su-57's low observability measures are chiefly effective against super-high-frequency (between 3 and 30 GHz) radars, usually found on other aircraft. The effects of Rayleigh scattering and resonance mean that low-frequency radars, employed by weather radars and early-warning radars are more likely to detect the Su-57 due to its size.
hey, do we have any Foundation guys here, dudes or non dude guys who know stuff about foundations? like how bad does this look
There wasn't any noticeable shifting on the floors inside. The realtor used a phone app as a level but I'm pretty sure that's real iffy as an accurate measuring device.
the big crack on the corner by the exposed cables is on a side of the house near a large tree on the neighboring property
the realtor thought the shifting in the foundation was caused by the drain (covered by leaves in one of the pics) dumping water straight down, but when I looked at it again I noticed concrete that was poured under the gutter, probably intended to slant away and divert it into a little ditch leading to the street
so I'm thinking the shifting in the foundation predates the drainage issue and was maybe caused by the tree? I didn't see any big roots TOO close but, idk
this house is kind of small (smaller than our apartment) but it's in a bourgie cracker restaurant neighborhood, or close enough to walk to it, so I imagine the ol' housing-as-commodities we got going on means it will constantly increase in value as long
but idk if something like this means it's like totally fucked because we can't really afford to buy this place AND put tens of thousands of dollars into some foundation repair bullshit
p.s. side note it has a really nice neighborhood, neighbor across the street has a FREE SEED LIBRARY! and a COMMUNITY PLANT EXCHANGE! that's amazing, the neighbor on the side grows peppers and idk what else in above ground containers, looks like spicy shit too. The other neighbor is a soccer fan but nothing can be perfect right?
p.p.s. the realtor kept speaking of insane plans to expand the bathroom but it also has a very large attic that like imo if finished could add like A Bunch of Value to the house? so, idk, it might be a good idea???
it's so hard to decide because it's so much money and contracts and like what if the foundation is totally fucked??? I guess the owner was a contractor and he checked it out when he bought it, but it's been a rental property since 2007. The HVAC also looks old.
but if we take too long to decide, someone might just buy it up because like why not it's in this great location! who cares if the foundations is fucked if you have a million dollars to spend fixing it!
Not a foundation guy but... you can see the cracks. Its not a good sign. If I saw that I'd assume the building is in its middle age at the youngest and more than likely in it's twilight years. If the realtor has a bunch of excuses pre-prepared as to why its NBD you know that it is a BD.
-What region of the US are we talking and how old is the house?
-Is this a full basement?
-Is the brick just a veneer or is the entire foundation structurally brick? Most foundations are poured concrete, CMU block, or stone for really old homes.
Most commercial CMU walls have a control joint, they stop laying the running bond (staggered pattern) and leave a vertical joint that allows expansion and settling to occur without head joints (mortar joints on the sides of the brick) cracking, residential foundation walls wouldn't have that detail so it's much more common for a crack to appear on houses. If the bed joints (joints on top and bottom of brick) were cracking you have a bigger issue because that could indicate the foundation wall is buckling from the lateral/hydrostatic pressure.
-What region of the US are we talking and how old is the house?
southeastern U.S. but not like the humid southern ass-pit, think foothills of appalachia
-Is this a full basement?
crawlspace
Is the brick just a veneer or is the entire foundation structurally brick? Most foundations are poured concrete, CMU block, or stone for really old homes.
idk dawg I couldn't tell you, it seemed like just bricks to me. I didn't look inside the crawl space because crawl spaces are scary and I wouldn't know wtf I'm looking for anyway
There is a tree on this side of the house maybe 18-20ft+ from the house so I'm thinking the roots messed it up, since there's concrete under the drain that I imagine would have flowed away from the house that's been shifted to let water pool right under the gutter, I think something other than that drain caused it (so, the tree I guess?) I didn't see any roots though.
It's basically a question of "like is it even worth it to pay money to have it inspected" because if it's really fucked we can't really afford to buy the house and fix it. It's already going to be 200k+ and although we have a loan for 225k we like, really need to use less than that to afford the mortgage
Can you get an inspection with this house or ask for repair credit? If you were really concerned about the foundation integrity I'd pull in an inspector before buying. It could be that the brick that's cracked isn't structural and it's no big deal. It could be that you have vertical cracks in the foundation from settling and a repair guy could inject some shit in it for maybe 1-2 grand. If it's horizontal cracks though you're looking at excavation, demo and replace while shoring up the house which is that huge cost you want to avoid.
You mentioned it's in the Southeast so if you aren't in that freeze/thaw cycle the cracks wont grow as quickly as up North if they do start leaking. Also, when you say crawlspace do you mean most of the floor is on foundation pads with posts throughout the interior? I'm just not sure what the typical foundation on a house down there would be made of.
I closed on my house without hiring an inspector and I'm sort of paying the price. I've got a couple foundation issues with a small leak and this pilaster they set for a corner addition that settled.
Can you get an inspection with this house or ask for repair credit?
my understanding is we can get an inspection but we'd have to pay for it and we might be out that money and other costs if we have to back out, and my understanding re: repairs is the owners seems like a huge bourgeois dickhead who wants like the price he wants or he's just going to keep renting it out as-is
it's a question of "is it so bad it's not even worth getting it inspected" because if it's going to be real expensive to fix we can't afford that + the house yknow
Not a foundation guy but rented a place with a fucked basement. You will have to pay to get that shit fixed either asap or probably more money down the line cause water leakage as well as mice and stuff, water expands when it freezes as well so each winter those holes are gonna get bigger and bigger. The realtor is trying yo make a sale and you shouldn't trust the realtor ever. You could call a foundation guy, get an estimate and see if you can have them knock that and the price of the consultation off the price of the house. This is gonna dissuade other buyers as well, so if you like everything else about it look into having it fixed as part of the sale, even if the costs of repair aren't totally covered you could probably see it significantly defrayed at least. I think thr problems down the mine you'd have to face if left unfixed now will cost a lot more down the line and if you're not willing to eat the cost at some point soonish and they won't play ball with reducing the sales price to meet you at least half way on the repair cost I'd walk
I'm not a foundation guy, but I'm decently old and have lived in places with less obviously sketchy foundations that had a lot of shifty problems, including our current house
tbqh, those cracks would make me pass, but again, I'm no expert
thank you for the input, my dad was worried but the realtor was all "what does your dad know" and it's like idk he's not a Foundation Guy but like he's worked on every house we've lived in
That realtor sounds shady. All realtors are tho, they're sales people and they are motivated strictly by making sales and not your best interests. Your dad cares about you, the realtor just wants to get paid.
well yeah it's just a question of "does this look so fucked that it would be too expensive to fix" because if we put money down on an inspection and other people are saying a structural engineer and then they tell us "yeah dawg it's fucked it'll cost tens of thousands to fix" then like, we can't do that, and we're just out all that money