You're viewing a single thread.
Genera?
32 0 ReplyGenre.
29 0 Replyit's very much ai,
generation?7 2 ReplyHave, you lost Ted?
1 0 ReplyPretty sure that's Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
1 0 ReplyPermanently Deleted
3 1 Replynope. it's the plural.
2 6 ReplyThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus... Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
5 0 ReplyNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
1 1 ReplyStill wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.
1 0 Reply
`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular "genre" though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.I was thinking of "genus".
6 11 ReplyI think the word genre comes directly from the french word ("genre", meaning "type"), which in the plural form is "genres". I don't think "genera" means anything, it's probably a typo
17 0 Reply"Genera" is a plural form of "genus" (i.e. also "type," but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
17 1 ReplyDerp, that's what I was thinking of.
1 0 Reply
They apparently couldn't be bothered to to type out
Generated?
1 0 Reply
Yeah....no it isn't.
9 0 Reply