Sure thing on the first part, but I'm not sure which report you're referring to.. One by the always fabulous Rachel Bloom, I hope 😁
He's even "under fire“! Such unendurable hardship for the unrepentantly fascist clown!
Do they have billboards saying "reluctantly voting Harris out of necessity"?
They should. The overwhelming majority of Biden voters voted against Trump more than for Biden and I'd bet the farm that, while probably to a significantly lesser degree, Harris is going to win in the same way.
The Dem leadership hasn't updated the pillars of their electoral and policymaking strategy since 1992 and it really shows.
Even when Harris or Walz say something truly based that gets the Left hopeful for real change in the right direction (which has happened a few times), some apparatchik always takes pains to point out that it's "not part of the platform" 😮💨
Notice how neither the OP, nor anyone else asked for your unnecessary objection. So it's very much you forcing yourself and your unwanted opinions wherever you feel like.
Says the person who injected themself into the conversation over 24h later when everyone else had moved on 🙄
You don't bring anything to the discussion on this forum. You instead change the topic to nitpick on someone's wording, completely disrespecting their argument.
Again, my stance against self-censorship is well-funded and thoroughly explained. It's not just a completely subjective pet peeve of mine that I've decided to foist on anyone, much less nitpicking, try as you might to make it appear so.
As for "completely disrespecting their argument", not every argument deserves respect, and "I'm gonna mangle a perfectly good word due to the not at all certain possibility of external censorship" is barely a justification, much less a valid argument for the necessity of such a mangling.
It's also ironic how you seemingly argue for freedom of expression, yet can't fathom that someone wants to use language in a way that differs from you.
Yeah, because saying that censorship getting in the way of free expression is bad is censorship! Give me a fucking break 🤦
I'd recommend working on your impulse control. Though it feels like you just like to hear yourself talk.
Again with the projection.
I'm not the one who inserted myself into a conversation that was already over. That was you.
I'm also not the one who has nothing to say except "I don't like your perspective" and I haven't tried to forbid anyone from anything. That's also you.
Doesn't it get exhausting in the long run to be such a tryhard hypocrite protector of the unvictimized?
That's not comparable
It very much is. Just saying "nuh-uh" doesn't make it any less so.
If you prefer, though, you can think of it as a craftsman refusing to use a tool because his mom told him not to, even if that tool is the best one for specific parts of the job.
On the contrary, I'd argue overly relying on swear words (...)
Of course. Just like overly relying on playing ONLY the G string would make your guitar playing suck even more than if you only used the other 5.
That's not a valid argument for avoiding words that are perfectly useful when deployed well, though. Especially not when it leads to the mangling almost beyond recognition of a perfectly descriptive and well-known neologism such as enshittification.
(as is the case in today's society)
..how fucking old and stuck in your ways are you??
I'm in my 40s and I haven't met anyone who's not either my parents' age or older, or ridiculously conservative who thinks "the kids today swear too much" lol.
If anything, people self-censor much MORE than they did a decade or two ago when social media and people trying to promote themselves while desperately avoiding offending anyone's delicate sensibilities wasn't so ubiquitous.
significantly reduces the richness of your vocabulary.
On the contrary, people who swear have consistently been shown to have much larger vocabularies of not just swears, but all other words too.
In any case, nobody is forcing you to self-censer, so why impose your opinion onto others?
Nobody's forcing you to object to my objection to unnecessary and linguistically ruinous censorship, so why impose YOUR opinion on ME?
Maybe because Lemmy is, amongst other things, a collection of discussion forums where sharing your opinions and discussing them with others is the POINT? That's my reason, anyway.
That and because I sometimes have poor impulse control when someone is wrong on the internet
Because censoring yourself needlessly like that constrains language, making it narrower and less useful for no good reason.
It's the equivalent of playing the guitar using only 5 strings because some authority figure told you that the G string is "dirty" or whatever.
Eh, Starfield isn't actually that bad. It isn't very good either, though, just mediocre.
Which would have been totally fine for an indie or a niche game from a major developer.
5 or 6/10 is worth playing for sure. It's just not worth paying AAA money or "this is going to be the best thing ever" style hype..
You gotta put two in the head to make sure
Fun fact: Julius Caesar wasn't the only Caesar by a long shot.
Additional fun fact: It was super late here when my brain farted that out 😄
He’s so toxic, he
won’t evenwill be able to score a spot on Newsmax.
Fixed that for you. For the likes of Newsmax, the more toxic the better.
I know for a fact that this community doesn't ban saying shit, so I guess his instance must suck big floppy donkey dick 🤷
If you think that all white people are supposed to be on the same team against everyone else and that not subscribing to your sick ideology is hatred, please remove all of you from the planet.
On the other hand, they didn't have Fallout New Vegas and had to contend with the REAL Caesar's legions, so I say we still win.
Enshatterfied™
🙄
(I'm avoiding a swearing word).
But WHY are you? Are you afraid your mom will ground you or your parish priest will frown at you if they found out that you don't needlessly self-censor?
Your armband is showing..
Elon Musk loves to have friends in high places — until those friends happen to be embroiled in widespread sex crime scandals.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21473674
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is leading a lawsuit to restrict access to mifepristone, a common abortion medication. He claims that the lost "potential population" from teen parents will cost the state revenue and political representation.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21198558
> Missouri’s attorney general has renewed a push to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone, arguing in a lawsuit filed this month that its availability hurt the state by decreasing teenage pregnancy. > > The revised lawsuit was filed by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, alongside GOP attorneys general in Kansas and Idaho. It asks a judge in Texas to order the Federal Drug Administration to reinstate restrictions on mifepristone, one of two medications prescribed to induce chemical abortions. > > The trio of attorneys general were forced to refile the litigation after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the original lawsuit after concluding the original plaintiffs — a group of anti-abortion doctors and medical organizations — did not have standing to sue because they couldn’t show they had been harmed.
"You sure Tommy is old enough to see Blade? It contains not just violence, but also the only thing we have to fear! And communication!“
The Republican presidential candidate ridiculously claimed that Biden is "trying to hold" Bibi back, as the Israeli prime minister continued to ruthlessly bomb Lebanon and Gaza.
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/45237868
> “He’s doing a good job,” Trump saidabout the Israeli leader. “Biden is trying to hold him back, just so you understand, Biden is more superior to the VP. He’s trying to hold him back, and he probably should be doing the opposite, actually. I’m glad that Netanyahu decided to do what he had to do, but it’s moving along pretty good.”
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20873430
In case you're wondering where her head is: that pink part next to all her floof is her nose 😄🥰
YouTube Video
Click to view this content.
Donald Trump on Friday accused Google of showing only "bad stories" about him and vowed to have the tech giant prosecuted if he gets back in the White House.Trump provided no backing for his accusation in a post on his Truth Social platform, in which he added that the search engine displays only pos...