Since July 1st, students have protested the unpopular proposal in which 30% of government jobs would be reserved for veterans of the 1971 War of Independence and their relatives. In a country with a youth unemployment rate of around 20% and a population of 170 million, a large number of otherwise eligible and competent people would have been forced out due to favouritism for veterans. As with basically every country on the planet over the last couple years, Bangladesh is suffering from inflation and an increasing cost-of-living, further exacerbating tensions.
The student protests have been met with significant violence by the government - local newspapers report that over a hundred protestors have been killed, and thousands have been injured. Guns and tear gas have been used. Additionally, the government has completely cut internet access throughout Bangladesh to prevent organizing, which has had some success in dividing protestors, but has also only further angered various parts of the country due to the massive impact to Bangladesh's online industries and various startups. And a national curfew has been in place to limit movement, with the population told to remain home if they want to be safe.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Bangladesh relented, stating that now, only 5% of government jobs would be reserved for veterans and their families. 2% would be allocated to members of minorities, with the remaining 93% distributed on merit. A period of tentative calm has arrived, but Hasnat Abdullah, a coordinator of the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement, has stated that unless the government restores the internet, removes the curfew, releases detainees, and forces certain ministers to resign within a few days, then the protests will resume.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Bangladesh! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Folks am I crazy to believe that Kamala has got this one in the bag?
If libs have voted for Biden's walking corpse, surely they will show up to vote for Kamala. She is a much better candidate than him in terms of vibes and optics, which is the only thing libs care about.
Besides, Roe v. Wade got overturned in the meantime, which means that libs actually have a reason to vote this time. I'm not saying that Dems will do anything about abortion when they win, but it's enough to mobilize their base to pokemon go to the polls.
At this point in time, i think she has it in the bag. However, this is probably one of the craziest elections i've ever seen; anything can fucking happen between now and november.
You can see how suddenly The Discourse™ has shifted from one solely built of melancholy and scolding, to one of enthusiasm and excitement (and scolding). Though the optimism is entirely misplaced in terms of policy or the legitimacy of US "democracy," it highlights just how much a difference it makes to have a political campaign which actually inspires hope in people, rather than one which fully embraces ossification, decline, hopelessness, and self-flagellation.
This honeymoon will fade, but there's a good chance it will last long enough to serve its purpose.
I think it was like a 30% chance that Biden won, and now it's a 50% chance that Harris wins.
So much is hanging on what both Trump and Harris do in the time up until the election that I'm uncomfortable making electoral predictions again now. But I don't see any big reasons why Harris can't win against Trump, unlike Biden. The Democrats - hell, most left-wing parties (relatively speaking obviously, the Democrats are also fascist) - in Western countries seem to be increasingly merely be protest votes against more overt fascism, rather than generating a ton of enthusiasm for their platforms or leaders. So in that sense, the Democratic candidate could be a plank of wood with a list of platitudes engraved into it and most of the Democratic base would still vote for it.
It's all the various minority groups where the real battles are, and I simply don't have enough information yet to know whether Harris will sway them or not. There are some good guesses I could make (probably a higher proportion of women and people of colour will vote for Harris than for Biden) but it's also possible that there's a big chunk of people who really liked the propaganda about Biden being a wise elderly statesman who is good on labour (lmfao) and/or don't trust a "young progressive newcomer" (lmfao). Americans are deeply politically ignorant so one has to analyze the propaganda, not the reality, when it comes to domestic politics.
But she stands a better chance than Biden does, I think that's indisputable.
Tbh she feels like a sacrificial lamb being thrown to the wolves because the establishment have already seemed to have crowned Trump president again and the Dems have accepted it. She's unpopular so they could just use this to dispose of her and keep better candidates untarnished for 2028.
Nah Kamala has a real chance against Trump imo. Most people vote because they hate the other candidate and the stage is perfect for that. Plus the upcoming debate will probably show Trump as a senile mf while Kamla will have her brain in place at the very least.
The problem is Kamala has never been popular, the KHive was entirely astroturfed and she really doesn't have a base. Now she's going to be the nominee without ever even completing a presidential primary and earning any electors at all. The blue no matter who people will vote for her but I suspect swing voters won't.
she was campaigning but dropped out in 2019 before any votes were cast
she dropped on the day before the California deadline to be removed from the ballot so she wouldn't get embarrassed by coming in fourth in her home state
She is the favorite imo a few things to take into account imo:
1- Kamala is also a flawed and bad candidate but the Trump campaign can't attack her on racism and misogyny alone. The dems are lucky that their evil inadequacy towards not protecting abortion now comes to give them the edge. Abortion is a popular issue and Trump doubling down on attacking it with a female president on the line? I think that is a bit too much for the civility cult.
The way in which Kamala is taking the momentum away from the post shooting narrative and sympathy towards Trump is going to be key imo. Trump was focused on Biden but now they have to turn around and attack Kamala and unless they suddenly become competent its tough.
How do you turn around from smol bean little "political violence" victim back towards a straight hateful misogynistic chud?
The Trump campaign will try to go on the offensive and this will abandon much of the good will and civility cult points he earned post shooting.
2- Trump isn't competent, he is disliked, he in fact did not leave a better economy. His only edge was a rethorical advantage against Biden on things Americans don't usualy care that much e.g foreign policy. I'm sorry to say but it wont take much for her to wash away most of her image from the Biden admin, all it takes is some empty promises towards de-escalating Gaza.
Keep in mind that on this issue Biden offered literaly nothing. he kept talking about NATO as if anyone gives a shit. Ukraine? Would've helped without the Putin gaffe but even then its an embarrassing lost war with nothing to show for except a massive budget. The point is normal average lib doesn't care about Ukraine beyond rethorical Putler bad shit.
I don't expect her to drop Ukraine/NATO talking points, but it would be a huge mistake to keep this the central point like Biden wanted so there is a decent chance she moves away from being obsessed with NATO like Biden is.
3- Hillary won the popular vote and we all acknowledge it was her own fault rather than any competent Trump strategy, we may see something similar where Kamala is the favorite but loses because of [insert your favorite conspiracy here].
i also think that, it would need some world historic fumbling the bag by dems. Especially when trump picked vance, who is in freakwing of republicans, with weird takes all around
oh, they won't do anything good, but they can deliver spectacle for the yearning masses.
My normie glasses says trump (and biden) are more charismatic than copmala, but she seems relatively adjusted person, when compared to trump.
(+) trump has attached republican baggage, the daftie motherfucker never brags about vaccine rollout (cause of anti-vaccines crowd), killing less people with covid (he tried, but fumbled in debate), he cant go against isntreal (which he could have gone if it wasn't for his freak son in law, but how isntreal is getting everything is straight ridiculous to untrained eye), he can't reframe abortion (which with his myriads of partners, he probably liked) like something which happened on biden watch and not his idea (he just selected the judges after all), he can't softly endorse trans acceptance, while personally somewhat likely not having problem with them (see miss universe stuff)
Idk. The democrats can fuck up incredibly easy lay ups. But, at least for the democrats base, a black woman cop seems like their dream candidate. Idfk, we are truly in the age of chaos, i'm not making any guesses at all. But she can speak in complete sentences.
I won't call it for sure till they debate. Kamala is awkward and a bit unlikeable and trump is well... trump. Neither of them have a good chance except that their only opposition is each other so one of them has to win.
It doesn't matter. Kick the Democrats while they're down. Pound home to the liberals that they will lose anyway. Make it true.
If you're trying to do some kind of "sane and rational" election prediction while the liberal establishment doesn't care and is just telling you that Copmala is the only option, that the Democrats are going to win, and that you must donkey or be complicit in fascism, you've already lost.