Echo Dot @ echodot @feddit.uk

Posts

1

Comments

8,722

Joined

2 yr. ago

I cannot see how you could ever have a situation where deliberately damaging military aircraft would be legal. I'm not sure what you're advocating for, changing of the law so that they're allowed to commit acts of extreme vandalism because they feel rightfully justified? How would that work?

Neither did you provide any data, somehow in the Internet it's always only the other side that should do it.

You simply don't understand how discourse works. You made a claim so you're the one that has to provide evidence for the claim. It is no one else's responsibility to go and find evidence for a claim you made.

I don't have to provide evidence because my question was asking you to provide the evidence, I did not say I have evidence to oppose your claim.

This is the UK we're talking about, absolutely no one in government knows how to block anything. Seriously every time they block something I just use one of those crappy free VPN plugins and get around it. Basically I'm only looking for magnet links anyway.

You don't even need to keep the VPN on to torrent the file. It's so stupid.

Jill has standards

OP just has crap internet. It absolutely does not take noticeable amount of time for JavaScript to download.

It's not coming out until 2026. It's probably unhealthy to hold it in that long.

2277 seems to be directly contradicted by 2278 and 2279.

The takeaway seems to be that it's immoral to end someone's life, although you can stop care if the care is more burdensome than letting nature take its cause. Which would seem to say that they're alright with people dying on their own, but not actually someone else taking action. But then 2278 also says that it should be the patient's decision, so presumably the patient can choose to end medical care that is continuing their life which, if you concede to their wishes, would be euthanasia.

Surely if the patient wishes is it and expresses that wish, then it is acceptable. It would only be a problem if the patient was unable to make a decision and someone else decided to end their life. Even if done in good faith.
But that's hardly a radical viewpoint.

It all seems sort of woolly and not very well thought out.

The problem is what they did didn't really have any meaning. They haven't really roused the public with their action, in fact their subsequent arrest has been more impactful for their cause than the actual action, and I can't imagine that was envisioned as a predicted outcome.

What they did was actually unhelpful because it allowed the government to label them as terrorists and therefore ignore them. Sticking to protests and writing to MPs and just making a general stink about things would, in the long run, have been more helpful because it would have never given them something that they could use as a stick to beat people with when they complained.

Yeah what they did was excessive vandalism. Not terrorism not unless it's the first move in a long strategy although if it is, it's a pretty dumb one since they've all been arrested.

They absolutely did, but the problem is that what they did in order to protest was a crime. A pretty big crime too, frankly they're lucky they didn't get shot.

I have absolutely no idea how those geniuses thought that this would be a good tactic.

I fully support their objectives, and I think it's ridiculous to call them terrorists, but what they did was beyond moronic.

The difference is that the Steam Deck actually uses fairly traditional controls. Two joysticks, face buttons, d-pad (not that anyone uses the d-pad), multiple back triggers.

This thing was been really weird with its three analogue inputs (how am I supposed to use three analogue inputs) and every other button was limited. It also existed in a world where I can just get an Xbox controller and plug it into my PC, and it just works, so what's the point anyway?

This thing isn't even particularly good at controlling the steam deck, which kind of proves the point that it never really made sense as a product.

Can you imagine what would happen if you did get post your second class post Sundays? Total fucking anarchy, we can't have that, so we have to make sure that it definitely will never happen.

Just hit up Teresa May's husband, he's good for illicit drugs.

Sometimes if I'm feeling lazy, I get the Doctors move the prescription to a pharmacy closer to my house. Rather than going into town.

Here are Americans with their paper flimsies. But you manage to have electronic voting.

What stats you haven't provided any stats, you just said the had legitimate grievances and then didn't elaborate.

Not if you don't live in the US. Everyone's going to be immortal except you guys.

Doesn't surprise me that the guardian wrote this. They always seem to be a bit out of touch with reality and supposedly they're left leaning newspaper as well, but I don't think they've caught up with current affairs just yet.

Are we sure about that because I've never really been able to get a unbiased viewpoint. You know because they're all racist over there as like the default position. Even if they're not unpleasant people they're kind of just casually racist, it does mean that whatever they say has to be taken with several hundred kg worth of salt

Don't worry we won't have to put up with it for long because apparently an AI is going to use a virus to kill us all in about 2 years time. Personally I wish it would get on with it.

If they got rid of the TSA they would have probably been given a lot more public good will, of course it would mean that the job market would suddenly have been swamped by the biggest bunch of idiots that anyone has ever had to deal with.