If they're not "subject to the jurisdiction", doesn't that mean they can just commit whatever crimes they want? Could they even be deported?
But that assumes the Republicans would be logical and consistent, when they are neither.
It's definitely true, and it's by design.
You think the military should have gotten involved in the election?
It is a load on a truck. Therefore, it is a truckload.
I am aware of the definition. How does this statement cause anyone to question their own senses?
Google whatever is printed on the chip.
Also learn the basic components of any system, and which components each device would need.
Don't feed the troll.
This is news? I've been talking about the difference between health insurance and health care for years.
The FBI is absolutely part of the intelligence alphabet.
What about this is gaslighting exactly?
This statement is in direct conflict with his actions.
Yes, Android has app pinning. But they still have access to anything the app gives them.
They can see my ID on the phone. But if they want to take it, then no, I don't have that ID on me. But then, I live in the US where digital ID isn't valid.
Because if you already know the trolley problem, you already know the whole content of the post. If you don't, now you do.
I had UHC but I'm generally healthy so I either had no claims or none denied, but I'll still contribute to his legal defense.
That's a real big if, and history indicates it would be unlikely.
Yes, but none of the toys (or few, and not the big ones) are his. The GPL means the rest of the community could fork Linux from its current state and continue without him.
And he doesn't really do that much these days anyway. He tries to be hands off as much as possible, because Linux is much bigger than just him, and he won't be around forever. The biggest thing he personally owns is the Linux trademark. (Not sure how involved he is in the Linux foundation day to day.)
And that's why you should practice defense in depth, for example, by ensuring users do not have excessive privileges, or access to files they don't need.
This is what I would recommend. LineageOS is great.
But if you're aiming for 100% open source, you should account for stuff like radio firmware. You'll have to look at Pinephone or Fairphone. Android contains a lot of binary blobs.
SEOUL, Dec. 4 (Yonhap) -- The National Assembly voted Wednesday to demand President Yoon S...
Unanimously.
Violence broke out following the recent Europa League match between Ajax Amsterdam and Maccabi Tel Aviv. A video showing the riots was misrepresented by many media outlets. DW takes a closer look.
Link to post: https://lemmy.world/post/19274834
If you tap that link in Boost it'll probably crash, so don't do it unless you're okay with that.
I'm guessing the problem is that the post URL is a magnet link.
Edit: oh yeah, to work around, you'll have to open it in a browser and hide it.
I got banned earlier today with the message "rule 1", no other information about why, or which comment broke the rule. As far as I can tell it was this one, which just says "We want the bot gone. That’s it. It’s really that simple."
So I checked the modlog for other bans, and @aniki@lemmings.world was banned today as well, also just for "rule 1", probably either for the comment saying "a stupid bot writing useless bullshit" or "This is what you call "Not listening to criticism."", neither of which are an attack on any person.
(Also earlier today @MindTraveller@lemmy.ca was banned with the message "fuck off", which I'm pretty sure is not a reason to ban someone from a major community, but doesn't appear to be related to the MBFC bot.)
One more today, @stormesp@lemm.ee was banned, again just "rule 1", last comment being this one, again not an attack on any person.
So what's the deal here? I couldn't find any rules for mods on lemmy.world with a brief poke around, but are we letting mods run major communities like little fiefdoms, banning people for criticism?