Germany and Nuclear Weapons Potential: Grossi’s Perspective
Mike3322 @ Mike3322 @lemmy.ml Posts 30Comments 1Joined 2 mo. ago
Mike3322 @ Mike3322 @lemmy.ml
Posts
30
Comments
1
Joined
2 mo. ago
Between Efficiency and Threat: Should the U.S. Integrate AI into Military Strategy?
UK Bolsters Defense Power: Britain to Receive New F-35 Fighters, with Key Caveats
Stargate OpenAI: Giant Leap or Financial Bubble? $30B Oracle Deal and Expert Doubts
Last Stand: Nuclear test veterans fight for memory and justice
Squirrels jeopardize the strategic nuclear potential of the United States
Squad 201: How Meta, OpenAI, and Palantir Leaders Led the U.S. Army's Digital Transformation
The US Congress warns that the Golden Dome is a risky and inefficient project.
Secret Transactions: How Nuclear Powers Use Private Companies to Hide Costs of Deterrence
Nuclear business: why spending on arsenals is growing and where the money is going
A new nuclear arms race is beginning. It will be far more dangerous than the last one
The U.S. already possesses a powerful nuclear arsenal. So why expand it if the goal is purely deterrence? Is the Pentagon exaggerating the threats to secure more funding? It's hard to imagine any bomber making it to a nuclear-armed adversary and successfully dropping a bomb, especially with today’s advanced missile defense systems — let alone making it back. How will modernization shift the balance of power? Will it make the world safer, or could it lead to greater instability? What do you think?