Understood. I've only recently been learning how much Canadian mortgages force their lendees to "readjust" to new conditions. In the US you can generally keep the initial terms shy of a refinance or foreclosure
Can you provide any local insight as to whether you can find a decent house at a lower rate than that?
I know housing affordability is a shit show there and that lady isn't making enough no matter what she does but I'm curious how much she could have lowered that percentage
She had to sell her house after her divorce and now pays $2,679 per month for a three-bedroom townhouse in the same neighbourhood. She didn't want her children, a teen boy and teen girl, to have to switch schools or share a bedroom
Then... What did selling the house achieve...?
Got to implement one of these systems at work before
They wanted it in place ASAP so I skipped creating an opt-out/opt-in "feature"
Just burn the "dangerous books" obviously...
This isn't a "question for the community" nor even a thinly veiled attempt at raising awareness: it's the epitome of self-righteousness
They're the same picture
So like... 20 years ago?
Right... like you didn't grow up watching the International Day of Solidarity with Long Term Anarchist Prisoners special every year with the rest of us
The high schools in Putnam County, FL were like this at least when I was a kid as a way to "keep costs low"
My dad unironically told me they added a paved road recently to show things are improving
Now I have 2 chairs
Just one more chair to go...
Wondering if it's about his car's or his cars' extended warranty
Nobody can answer this question for you but I think to the countless examples of people not "getting out while they can" who are now--or were until their death--forever trapped in a bad situation that people today forget wasn't that bad even within living memory
Is it right for you? I don't know
Is it cowardly to let a sense of national loyalty compel you to be exposed to the mechanisms of government wielded by untrustworthy actors? No, and anybody saying otherwise is lying to you at best; lying to themselves at worst
Inb4 any what aboutisms: nothing I've said here is specific to any country
Those are 2 very different questions
Double equals not throwing a syntax error in SQL?
Dude has obviously lost touch with reality
Well well well how the turntables
Who*
-
You can just drop the "in" altogether
-
Why just "sound like" when I can be?
Not great doesn't mean bad. I had fun with Gran Turismo
I can't not see this dude as being a centimeter tall
I thought this would be dead simple but trying to label a road as "bike-friendly" isn't as intuitive as one would hope (am I "adding" a road even though it's technically there or reporting "wrong info" piece by piece?)
You'll need to update the praw.Reddit() parameters and set booleans to True based on what you want to have cleared.
This also overwrites your comments with nonsense content seeing as Reddit doesn't really delete your comments if nobody forces them
Sorry about the amateurish Python, this isn't my go-to language
``` import praw
#Update all values set to XXXXXX and set boolean values to True for whatever you'd like to clear
reddit = praw.Reddit( client_id="XXXXXX", client_secret="XXXXXX", user_agent="script running locally", #required for PRAW but not sure content matters username="XXXXXX", password="XXXXXX" )
#booleans delete_posts = False delete_comments = False delete_saved = False clear_votes = False unsubscribe = False
def get_posts(): return reddit.user.me().submissions.new(limit=100)
def get_comments(): return reddit.user.me().comments.new(limit=100)
def get_subscriptions(): return reddit.user.subreddits()
def get_saved_items(): return reddit.user.me().saved(limit=100)
def get_upvoted(): return reddit.user.me().upvoted(limit=100)
def get_downvoted(): return reddit.user.me().downvoted(limit=100)
while(clear_votes): count = 0 upvotes = get_upvoted() downvotes = get_downvoted() for vote in upvotes: try: vote.clear_vote() count += 1 print('Clearing vote for: ', vote) except Exception as e: print('Could not clear vote due to: ', e, '(this is normal for archived posts)') continue for vote in downvotes: try: vote.clear_vote() count += 1 print('Clearing vote for: ', vote) except Exception as e: print('Could not clear vote due to: ', e, '(this is normal for archived posts)') continue if(count == 0): clear_votes = False
while(delete_saved): count = 0 saved_items = get_saved_items() for item in saved_items: item.unsave() count += 1 print('Unsaved item ID: ', item) if(count == 0): delete_saved = False
while(delete_posts): count = 0 posts = get_posts() for post in posts: print("Deleting submission: ", post) post.delete() count += 1 if(count == 0): delete_posts = False
#Replace comments with nonsense data first as Reddit only "marks comments as" deleted while(delete_comments): count = 0 comments = reddit.user.me().comments.new(limit=1000) print("Replacing comments with nonsense data") for comment in comments: comment.edit('So long and thanks for all the fish') print("Deleting comments") for comment in comments: comment.delete() count+=1 if (count == 0): delete_comments = False
while(unsubscribe): count = 0 subscriptions = get_subscriptions() for subreddit in subscriptions: subreddit.unsubscribe() count += 1 print('Unsubscribed from: ', subreddit.display_name) if (count == 0): unsubscribe = False
print('--finished--') ```