ExLisper @ ExLisper @lemmy.curiana.net Posts 0Comments 121Joined 4 wk. ago
Not sure what are you talking about. I'm using GraphaneOS as a daily driver and my banking apps work perfectly. The only 'banking' app that didn't work is Revolut but I easily found an alternative and switched. The apps for two actual banks I use work without issues. Notifications work fine, no issues at all. I don't have separate user profile, I have a work profile created with Shelter app. Everything just works. Work profile apps can't access contacts or files from main profile. Google services are only available in work profile.
Both Waltz and Goldberg work for FDD. My theory: Waltz is paid by FDD, wanted to do them a favor and keep them in the loop on Houti attacks so he adds their Iran expert to the chat. Well, tried to add...
https://www.fdd.org/team/richard-goldberg/ https://en.everybodywiki.com/Richard_Goldberg_(Illinois)
Richard Goldberg: aide to US National Security Advisor in previous Trump administration, expert on Iran, wrote press release announcing Waltz's nomination.
Both Goldberg and Waltz work at FDD: https://www.fdd.org/team/michael-g-waltz/
Clearly Waltz was trying to add him to the chat instead of Jeffrey Goldberg, right?
Showing ID when you vote is an requirement in every European country since forever. There's no slippery slope here. Ability to identify yourself is a pretty basic thing in a civilized country. Where I live proof of residence allows you to vote in local elections. National elections require citizenship. National ID proves you're a citizen. It's really simple.
It's just something I found, no idea how plausible it is. It does look like a pretty big coincidence to me but no one is reporting on that.
Is it a coincidence that the person who wrote press release announcing Mike Waltz’s nomination is called Richard Goldberg, that he worked in previous Trump’s administration and is an expert on Iran/Houti? Did Waltz add Jeffrey Goldberg totally by accident or did he simply confuse the Goldbergs?
Is it a coincidence that the person who wrote press release announcing Mike Waltz's nomination is called Richard Goldberg, that he worked in previous Trump's administration and is an expert on Iran/Houti? Did Waltz add Jeffrey Goldberg totally by accident or did he simply confuse the contacts?
The problem here really is that there's no standard national ID system in US, not that someone is asking for a proof of citizenship in order to vote.
The only person in real danger here is the journalist.
Saint James
My theory is that it's brain atrophy, not stupidity.
Americans are not stupid in the sense that they can't learn and do things. They are perfectly capable to work in a bank, fix a car, fly a plane or be a doctor. But even if they do work as as accountant or a surgeon (like Ben Carson...) they rarely use brains for analytical thinking. They don't have to. School is easy (you can just play sports), finding job used to be easy, buying home used to be easy, you were born into one political party and just followed it. You drive your huge car on endless highways surrounded by aesthetically sterile malls, eat your burgers, watch some football and that's it. No need to analyze things so your brain kind of forgets how to do it.
Eventually the country split into the curious part that actually wants to study and understand things and the "stupid" part that just consumes propaganda and votes for Trump. As some point the "stupid" part became the majority. Now not everything is that easy for young people but I think it's too late.
Permanently Deleted
Zuck has to be pissed it wasn't WhatsApp.
Signal: so good even people who hate privacy use it!
The pool wasn't about general election. It's about primaries. Insane as it is, it's all about name recognition. People in US will simply vote for the one person they heard about. But it's still early, other candidates still have time to get their name out there.
Still? I never even considered it. Expensive, poor quality.
I wasn't taking about forming a new party. There are many parties out there already. People's Party, Green Party, Libertarian Party... I'm talking about why people don't vote for them. If Bernie and AOC formed a new party they would face the same issues as all the other parties. In the end they would have work with Democrats and most probably would be absorbed by them.
How do they work?
In democracies with multi-party systems you have two voting rounds. In first every party presents a candidate. If anyone gets over 50% of votes he wins and that's that. If no one gets more than 50% two candidates with most votes go to second round.
In U.S. you have only one round and usually it's super close. If 3rd party candidate enters the race and gets even 1% of Democrat votes the Republican will win for sure. That's why Bernie took part in Democratic primaries. His only chance was to win those and run as Democrat candidate. That's also why Tea Party and MAGA movements were integrated into Republican party even though they started outside of it. If you want 3rd party candidates to run in elections you would have to change the system completely.