In a Hole in the Ground there Lived a Fed
Also, they had mayors and stuff, a VERY clear class division and were technically under the rule of Gondor after the Northern Kingdom fell but Gondor didn't really have the resources or urge to do any ruling over there. Once Aragorn was in they were essentially an autonomous zone under military protection in exchange for maintaining the local roads and bridges.
Hobbits can better resist the One Ring because they operate within a greater evil.
Tom Bombadil is the grillpilled wife guy and is therefore unaffected by the the threat of Sauron, the temptation of the ring, or the plight of the Fellowship.
Who would fear someone like Sauron after witnessing American Empire.
Aragorn EleSSar
AraKKKorn EleSSar the KKKing of DiSSunited KKKingdom
Oh god, I could make a really sectarian take right now, but I can't
I could call you a spineless weasel who's trying to imply an insult to our anarchist comrades without getting in trouble, but I won't.
Do it
Also, the Sacksville Baggins' were jerks
It was not just any honey-pot. It was a Fed honey-pot, and that meant comfort.
Thing is, the Shire was a hereditary monarchy, they just didn't call their ruler a king - it was Thane. Pippin was in line for and did eventually inherit the title.
There's also Buckland, the small offshoot of the Shire ruled by the Master of Buckland, and of course this title was inherited by Merry.
I'm a little more sympathetic to the Hobbits. Here you had a stable kin-based society in a part of the world that nobody cared about until some Fed from a far off Western Superpower (that destroyed an entire continent and sunk another island nation under the sea, mind you) is meddling around.
they're settler colonists. where are the original inhabitants of the shire? bit suspicious, eh?
The timeline says they were "allowed" to move there by original settler-colony of Arnor, which suggests displacement since Tolkien is a known Western sympathizer.
the ringwraiths are the cia
Gondor had kings, they just hadn't had one in a long time because they thought the line died out. That's why Denethor sits next to the throne and not on it, he was just the Steward. As Isildur's heir, Aragorn had the "rightful claim" to the throne. It's actually encouraging that he waited until after the evil threat was destroyed to take power.
aragorn spent his youth travelling in the east, stirring up discord against denethor. he also spent time in gondor, learning its ways.
then he used the war he stirred up to coup the rightful steward.
Rightful King > Rightful Steward
A King can't coup a Steward, that's like saying your regular teacher "got the sub fired", when all they did was come back from vacation. And besides, Denethor has only Denethor to blame for his fate, the dude was a prick and a psychopath who killed himself while trying to kill his own son.
Huh history is sectarian now.
Is posting that any better? Everyone knows you're dogwhistling a dogshit take.
Your right. Anti-anarchism is wrecker shit, and the anarchists on this site do more irl praxis in a week than my shut-in ass is likely to do my whole life.
Bud Cubby did nothing wrong.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Hmm. IMO it's kind of weird to assume all hobbits were ideologically identical. They clearly didn't establish a completely anarchist society for themselves, but there was also a lot of resistance to and outright ignoring of authority among them. They didn't really give a shit if they were technically under the rule of some empire, and at least some of them didn't seem to give a shit about what the Mayor had to say. I don't think we got much of an insight into their economic relations.
It's true the ones who went adventuring were—or turned into—some pretty gross bootlickers, though.
Who the fuck names their kid Epidiah?
This tickled something in my brain, and I finally figured out what: Последний кольценосец
jesus christ the western brainpan is absolutely cucked
Literally
I've really gotta read that. I'm a giant Tolkien nerd and interact with some of well known Tolkien academics online and have added 'Do normal spiders exist in middle earth or are they all descendants of Ungoliant?' To the discussion with a degree of pot stirring. I'm also generally a pretty sympathetic to the orcs and have some criticism regarding elves.
It's a page-turner, but what no one ever says about it in the summaries is that it's like a geo-political spy thriller set in middle earth after the books. It's so good and not at all what I thought it'd be going in.
fucking baby-brained summary I expect nothing less from natopedia
I also once wondered about it so guess this isn't such weird question if we came to it independently. Both the existence of Shelob and spiders in Hobbit seems to support it as clear hierararchy of decline of spiderkind, like other species in Tolkien universe also decline in time and generations. Maybe Tolkien just hated spiders, i do know that fragment in Hobbit is the hardest part to read for me out of entirety of his works.
I was positive that regular spiders do exist and were servants of Vairë the Weaver, but I guess I was extrapolating from a line that refers to her weavings as "webs".
i've heard of it and it does sound interesting, but i've always been somewhat wary of the LOTR extended universe since being burned by the silmarillion (its so long and my dyslexic ass has a job 😭) - how knowledgeable about middle earth do you have to be to enjoy it? i loved the original books but i'm a bit of a noob when it comes to fingolfin/feanor/etc
the book gives you the rundown in the first chapter, if you know the og story you're good