Wouldnt this be the reverse, with the prey animal only being able to see a 4:3 with both eyes?
80 3 ReplyScreens don't require 3d vision
43 0 ReplyNo, they see more of the sides to detect predators. Predators eyes are forward, narrow cone of vision
23 2 ReplyI wouldn't call it narrow. It's almost 180 degrees. More than enough for a 16x9 monitor
13 0 Reply
Agreed- the comparison is missing the blind spot in the middle.
7 0 ReplyThat's how I read it. If a narrow screen helps you see the details, it stands to reason that the high resolution part of your vision is narrower. The diagram is pointing to the prey to want a narrow monitor to fit where their vision is best.
5 0 Reply
I mean, it's not, but do you King.
If the screen is inside your field of view, youre not losing detail using a 16:9 monitor.
63 0 ReplyYou do lose details in the sense of how much attention everything on screen gets. When looking at something, you don't process everything in your FoV equally - for example you don't notice lower resolutions outside your focus area.
5 0 Reply
If you're not gaming on 9:16 you're not a true gamer
53 2 ReplyI game on 9:21. I'm seeing every damn cloud in the sky and every blade of grass down to my feet.
51 0 ReplyI prefer 16:10 but rotated 22°
74 0 Reply
4 0 Reply
Maybe just try switching to a 4:3 resolution before investing in an entire monitor.
43 0 ReplyCost breakdown of my 4:3 monitors:
Please take this, I'll even pay for shipping if you need it shipped€
One of the smaller investments...
16 0 Reply
Where in the fresh hell does one even get a 4:3 screen these days?
35 0 ReplyI just took a 16x9 and hacked the sides off with a sawsall. It doesn't work now, but I still feel superior.
81 0 ReplyAttaboy show em who's boss
10 0 ReplyU da king, king
3 0 Reply
Thrift stores
9 0 Replyjust get a 16:9 and play with the display settings to disable the edges
5 0 ReplyThe second hand market. I don't think many of them will even be 1080p or 60Hz, and i'm pretty sure you can forget about 4k
I have one listed on craigslist right now, for free because it's broken. No takers.
5 0 ReplyI used to have a CRT screen that was 1600x1200 @60hz, so high resolution ones do exist.
14 0 Reply
Should be flipped, compare the "seen by both eyes" regions.
32 4 Reply16:9 is wayyyy better than 9:16.
:P
3 0 Reply
Counter-Strike moment
11 0 ReplyI wish 4:3 was still a thing on laptops.
5 0 ReplyI want 3:2
6 0 ReplyThere are 3:2 laptops like the Framework and Huawei matebook x pro. But 3:2 is still quite far from 4:3
6 0 ReplyI've used one briefly, it was fantastic. If only Microsoft's Surface wasn't the biggest player in the 3:2 market.
6 0 ReplyI want 1:1.
Instagram life.
6 0 Reply
The newer Lenovo X1 is damn near 4:3, I think mine's 1900x1200
2 0 ReplyI guess 1920x1200. The equivalent in 4:3 would be 1920x1440, not really close.
4 0 Reply
4:3 is the "both eyes" span of the prey, 16:9 the predator. If you're doing better with 4:3, you might not be the kind of "GOAT" you want to be.
4 1 ReplyJust get a smaller screen or sit a bit further then
2 0 Replyinterestingly, humans is 100° each side - between the two.
It also means you are constantly seeing the inside of your own skull but the brain edits it out
5 9 ReplyYour cornea doesn't end inside your skull dude. Your eye can only see out from the transparent part of your eye...
14 0 ReplyIs there enough light to "see" it, as in is it visible?
4 0 ReplySounds wild, got source?
4 0 Reply