2w ago

TikTok ban cited in suspected arson of Rep. Glenn Grothman's office

www.fdlreporter.com TikTok ban cited by man suspected of setting fire to US congressman's office in Fond du Lac

Police and fire personnel responded to the report of a fire at the strip mall containing the congressman's office at around 1 a.m. Sunday.

FOND DU LAC – A 19-year-old man accused of setting fire to a building in Fond du Lac early Sunday that included Republican U.S. Rep. Glenn Grothman's office cited the TikTok ban as a motive in the incident, according to authorities.

The Fond du Lac Police Department said the Menasha man was arrested after being found near a strip mall, 525 N. Peters Ave., that contained Grothman's district office.

Wisconsin @midwest.social

Five @slrpnk.net

2w ago

TikTok ban cited by man suspected of setting fire to US congressman's office in Fond du Lac

www.fdlreporter.com /story/news/local/2025/01/19/tiktok-ban-cited-in-arson-of-us-congressman-glenn-grothmans-office-in-fond-du-lac/77825530007/

5 3

news @hexbear.net

BountifulEggnog [she/her] @hexbear.net

2w ago

TikTok ban cited by man suspected of setting fire to US congressman's office

www.fdlreporter.com /story/news/local/2025/01/19/tiktok-ban-cited-in-arson-of-us-congressman-glenn-grothmans-office-in-fond-du-lac/77825530007/

14 13

News @lemmy.world

MicroWave @lemmy.world

2w ago

TikTok ban cited by man suspected of setting fire to US congressman's office in Fond du Lac

www.fdlreporter.com /story/news/local/2025/01/19/tiktok-ban-cited-in-arson-of-us-congressman-glenn-grothmans-office-in-fond-du-lac/77825530007/

132 31

19 comments

Be gay do crime
Legislators should be afraid of the people

Fuck Glenn Grothman.
- Don't torch his office over it though
  
  There's many other reasons to torch his office. You should check out what his congressional district looked like.

The vote was overwhelmingly in favor of the ban, dude, on both sides of the aisle, and every other House member in Wisconsin voted in favor of it. Your one legislator is not the deciding factor on this.
- It was inserted into a bill for foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel. That's what had bipartisan support.
  
  Hardly. It even had a unanimous supreme court decision to uphold the ban. The ban had bipartisan support up until what's his name started jerking everyone around.
  Legally, this is all well-covered ground with the Grindr divest or ban law that was wrapped up the week before COVID lockdowns started. So most people forgot about it.
  Because there's money involved, 47 wants to spin everyone around in hopes of ByteDance changing their mind and selling to one of his tech bro campaign funders so that big financial benefits from knowing the president can stay in day 1.
  
  More reasons not to vote for it. Quite the flex to say 'I had to vote for it, because it was in the must-pass genocide bill!'.