I agree, I don't like all the self censorship that I think comes about from algorithms like tiktok - I'm not talking about ideas, but instead about literal words replacement censorship like "unalive" "seggs" and that like
I want people to be bold enough to use the real word - at least in irl conversation.
Its to avoid being censored actually. I think we get their gist when we are missing one letter. Depends on which platform that determines if it's pointless or not but who cares.
If you're gonna self censor then just use a different word. Self censoring is still caving in to censorship in general. Either say the full word uncensored or pick a different word. Anything else is just annoying to read.
I disagree with that. Content creators need to adapt to survive with the modern algorithms. Those algorithms are trash and the censorship behind it can eat a fat one, but the creators are just trying to get paid.
Now, bringing that self-censorship into real life, into casual conversation with friends, off of platforms that are monetized... that is what annoys me. Not because they are difficult to read, that's just an evolution of slang, but because it muddies the language and weakens our ability to communicate. "Unalive" instead of suicide or killed makes it seem less serious, less graphic, at least to me. And that's the whole point of why they are using replacements in monetized content, because it is safer, but sometimes language needs to be harsher.
I worked for a buttoned-down suit & tie stick-up-their asses American financial institution back in the early 90s and I had this one coworker from Scotland who would curse a blue streak in every meeting / phone call. Anyone else would have been called before HR. He always got away with it. I think mostly because the suits couldn't parse half of what he was saying. He would call out a lot of bullshit on projects, too. I fucking loved that guy.
A lot of the time they are doing it to avoid their posts coming up when malicious assholes search for posts about topics they want to argue about. I guess it works when those assholes are too lazy to try searching with wildcards.
Also a lot of them do it because of habit from games or messaging apps that have language filters. It is a modern version of allowable cursing that older people learned as kids, like saying fudge instead of fuck.
It doesn’t make much sense anyway. You try to take away the power a word has or make it so it’s not readily available, but that just makes me wonder more about it.
“The f word? Which f word?”
“Why did they put an asterisk to hide ‘abuse’?”
“F*cker” - great censoring. Nobody will ever be able to tell what that word was.
It's because more and more platforms (especially ones primarily used by younger people) are more likely to reduce the reach of their content when it has swear words in it. So many sites now push content to people or push content higher on search lists based on various factors. Content can be kept back even if it isn't outright removed. So while it may be annoying to see people say stuff like "unalive" instead of "kill", it's entirely understandable.
I believe it's what they learned growing up on YouTube/social media. Demonetization is why content is censored, but when perceived from a child's eyes, without that context, it can easily be seen as "the norm".
While some people don't mind that FAFO, cast majority are not willing to get dicked by their social circle, school and employer over having annoying "opinions" like getting paid a fair wage
Ohh I do a lot of FAFO it is a life style choice...
But I don't blame poors, young or vulnerable to avoiding it.
I do judge the bootlicker harshly. Imagine being an adult person with decent economic situation and then still taking daddy's dick while punching down...