RE: Bad Empanada
RE: Bad Empanada
In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada's defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.
105 comments
-
-
counterpoint - who cares what this guy thinks
-
We need an anti streamer aktion emoji I can just post to save time whenever one of them has a bad take or turns out to be a pedophile (on a long enough timeline this is all of them)
-
"The arc of the streamer universe is long, but it bends toward sexual assault and the exploitation of minors"
— MLK
-
-
-
Disappointed this isn't indexed as "nightmare-blunt-rotation"
-
-
-
Whether or not it's extremely unclear jokes and layers of irony poison, the rhetoric is just pointless at this stage.
I was a big fan of BE in the past, but too much time on Twitter and adopting a 'streamer' personality has completely brainwormed him in recent years; It seems like he cares more about "winning" over other people on the internet instead of presenting any coherent thought. He's made some great videos in the past, but not even his fans seem to know what side he's taking on a given day anymore.
-
The further away the BadEmpanada posts are from his main channel, the worst his takes are
-
-
Idk why anybody is surprised it's not like their name is GOOD empanada
-
BadEmpada is like Mao in that he has some good takes and bad takes. He is unlike Mao in that Mao wasn't a youtube.
Personally I will say that I think we should go further and work towards a good empanada.
edit: Tone clarifier, I am doing a bit. If you actually believe I would believe this, then I am a teeny bit saddened. My actual opinions are much dumber.
-
BadEmpadanus is like Lysenko in that he has two good takes and the rest are all bad. He is unlike Lysenko in that Lysenko wasn't a thinly-veiled fascist who intentionally decided to help further colonize Argentina.
Personally I will say that I think we should go further and work towards fewer empanadas as they are not a significant part of a healthy diet.
-
Let's compromise and agree he is kinda like Kropotkin because they both have names that are kind of funny, and that you can have a good empanada once in a while, as a treat
-
-
Bad Empanada is waging a protracted streamers' war.
-
Doing the mass line but for posting
-
-
-
- bad empanada
-
gotta love pro-imperialism ultras
-
Bad Empanada has good videos, but the worst takes on Twitter sometimes. I had to block him for my sanity.
-
-
Counterpoint: Bademeinhof Group
-
-
Ukraine is such a fascinating litmus test because the correct option is "neither" or "I hope the side backed by the U.S suffers total failure in their stated or professed objectives" and it's not that hard a take to make, given the U.S is run by demonic ghouls.
-
No you see I'm pro Ukrainian people
And by that I mean shoving conscripted civilians into a meat grinder of a war thats been lost over a year ago so the US stock market can go up 3.5%.
I'm the morally correct one, you all are just evil RuZZia bots that want Putler to win so he can bring back muh Soviet empire
(Israeli flag in bio)
-
-
Having faith in streamers; this is the 18th type of liberalism.
-
-
if you ever wondered how "leftists" turn into rightwing neocons in their later lives, start here
-
Yeah I’m good on this dude. Plenty of principled commies to follow, not wasting any more of my time with Schrödinger’s liberal
-
at the end of the day, leftist youtubers are small business owners in the media industry, nothing beyond edutainment material will ever come from them
we shouldn't look to any of them as figures of political leadership or guidance....
-
The fact you think people would come around who were defending his Maduro take if they see he is anti-Russia is just kind of laughable to me.
That is a more reasonable take by any metric lol
-
-
right, sometimes I forget this site is full of Putin's strongest soliders.
-
-
-
Bad Bad Empanada
-
-
I remember that thread. The thing is that maduro take is still the least shitty thing he said.
-
Ignorance is a sign of superiority here. Not caring is the objectively correct stance on people whose jobs are to have bad takes to get attention. This also applies to online patsoc weirdos.
-
this is correct. the more people whine and bemoan idiots the more attention they get and the more bad takes they can produce
-
-
Who?
105 comments
Schrodinger's bait
This is some V*ush
shit, dude needs to stop drinking the irony poison."merely pretending" type shit
This is far from the first time he's said contradictory shit. Idk if he's irony poisoned or just changed his opinion based on what pisses people off the most.
His views on Ukraine are very clear if you watch his videos like the 90 minute one about how the scientific consensus on the Holodomor is that it wasn't a genocide, but since a lot of people in here get irrationally angry because of the smallest criticism of AES (while claiming to be "critically" supportive) and starts to cry fed they are a very easy target to troll. After this i am even less convinced that his Venezuela video was serious (which would be good because it was awful).
technically he said ORcs, which may refer to Oregan (a State in the US), or Operating Room, or Onion Ring, you see it's a coded message, he wants this Zelensky dude to meet him in Oregan for onion rings later.
We must support the ANDks of the free world in their democratic war against the authoritarian ORks.