‘Can Artificial Intelligence Speak for Incapacitated Patients at the End of Life?’ No, and what the hell is wrong with you?
‘Can Artificial Intelligence Speak for Incapacitated Patients at the End of Life?’ No, and what the hell is wrong with you?
that diffusion of responsibility is a thing that already happened with crypto too
no officer, it's not a ponzi because it's a Distributed Future of Finance™, go pound sand, do you hate progress?
I remember seeing some crytpo bro smugly explain that his obviously illegal business model was fine because "It's a DAO, I'm just a community member."
Based on your record of shitposting, our AI model predicts that your final wish is that your entire estate be left to ... Marc Andreessen? Is that correct? If so, blink as if in surprise.
I knew your post would be good when you mentioned Marc Anderson, then you followed up with the blinking thing. Will you run for office?
No joke, no trolling, just good shit mate.
Can't wait for the profit above care tier hospitals to have their own AI that allows patients in a vegetative state to "freely" tell those same hospitals that they need to remain alive on whatever system is keeping them alive for as long as possible, making sure their family incurs the max amount of debt/bills possible. I'd think most middle aged or older family members would absolutely believe the AI is actually connected to their brain and is telling them it's what they want since they seem to be a lot more gullible about anything AI generated being real, if fakebook is to be believed.
I mean, while this idea is obviously a stupid one, I have seen some suggestion that an AI could be used to help interperet the brain activity of patients that are capable of thought but not communication, and thus help them communicate with doctors, rather than try to figure out what they might have said from prior history.
"could" is a word meaning "doesn't"
I do not recommend using the word "AI" as if it refers to a single thing that encompasses all possible systems incorporating AI techniques. LLM guys don't distinguish between things that could actually be built and "throwing an LLM at the problem" -- you're treating their lack-of-differentiation as valid and feeding them hype.
I use a term I've seen used before, I'm not familiar enough with the details of the tech to know what what more technical term applies to this kind of device, but not to other types, and especially not what term will be generally recognized as referring to such. The hype guys are going to hype themselves up regardless in any case, seeing as that type tend to exist in an echo chamber as far as I can see.
🦀 THEY DID NEUROIMAGING ON A DEAD SALMON 🦀
As an autistic who struggles with communication and organizing thoughts, LLMs have been helping me process emotions and articulating things. Not perfectly in the way that you'd describe (hence i mostly don't use LLM outputs themselves as replies), but my situation is much better than pre-November 2022
It is a shame LLM's weren't designed to be a common good to Disabled people though. We're just a happy use case accident for these companies and AI manufacturers. It's tricky because this could be done just as well, I figure, with specifically designed LLM's instead of generic ones. @pavnilschanda @CarbonIceDragon
this remark demonstrates a stunning lack of any understanding of anything at all of any of the topics involved in this, amazing
All jokes aside I had an AIDungeon saved story that was built around the emails and texts my mom sent before she passed, I used it as a kind of therapy.
I knew I was talking to an AI but it was interesting to see what the engine did with it. Was pretty accurate too. Granted this was before the Dumb Dragon fiasco so you probably couldn't make that quality of output anymore.
edit: to the absolute human shitstain that downvoted this, have the balls to reply why.
edit: to the absolute human shitstain that downvoted this
ugh. don't do that :<
have the balls to reply why.
this isn't highschool, no-one owes you homework
(a bit of advice: instead treat that as a reason to reflect as to why. you might learn something)
I'm completely sympathetic to you here despite the edit. sorry that happened and I'm glad you found some way to help in dealing with it
"Can AI do [Blank]" is getting pretty old. They will literally fill in that blank with anything they can come up with and it's getting kinda silly.
Here's a list of potential new AI articles I predict coming out within the next year:
I'm sure at least one of these articles already exists. Literally all they are trying to do is make money with half baked ideas or steal your personal data.
a fun little rule of thumb that I like to apply is that whenever an article's headline is a question you may safely presume the answer is usually no.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines
They literally mentioned this in the article.
done already
pretty sure I've seen this
done
done
done
pretty sure japan already has this problem
i'd be shocked if not already done
pretty sure I've seen this
i think these are predictions of last week
The great thing about using AI to search for aliens is that it'll find them, whether there's any out there or not.
I remember reading not to long ago about people having AI as girlfriends.
We already know how to solve the climate crisis. We just don’t want to because it would cost too much, inconvenience us, and really upset the shareholders.
The only reason to ask AI would be like asking the butler to take out the trash, we just can’t be bothered to do even that much work and want to hit the “easy” button.
Sounds about right. And I'm sure at least half of them are just click bait while the others are wishful thinking. Or just sad...