stickly @ stickly @lemmy.world Posts 1Comments 36Joined 5 days ago
Good news, we're about to have a lot less allies!
Those judges aren't on the Supreme Court (where this will eventually end up). Its the same as a Republican doing a performative protest vote against GOP legislation that goes through anyway. They get to save some face, but at the end of the day no harm no foul.
Doing only that would just give them more fodder to complain about a deficit. Mass violent resistance is just an excuse for crackdowns and martial law.
One interesting and simple idea I've seen is just opting out of the consumer economy. Americans in any socioeconomic strata can just stop buying anything but the bare minimum.
General strikes are effective but hard to coordinate and maintain, most people can't risk skipping a paycheck. But anyone can switch to beans and rice, cancel subscriptions, learn to repair their own clothes, buy a phone second hand, etc... Since a massive portion of our economy is driven by that spending (68% of our GDP) it would definitely hurt, but they couldn't ignore it.
It's easy to do and doesn't have an outsized impact on poor or at risk groups, and it's not all or nothing so any way you can cut helps. I wonder how they'd react to 200 million people on an economic hunger strike...
Hey at least that means the nukes might not work?
Nah I highly doubt they'll continue to allow articles about it. Be sure to call ahead at CVS for your horse dewormer though
Burnie Burns? Weird choice but I admit it'd be an upgrade
So is it the interest that's the problem? Or the not working?
You could be unable to work on disability with an inherited house and get pretty much to that poverty line. Why isn't that the same?
What if there wasn't interest but I got $5m in the lottery and just decided to spend $1m buying a house in a good neighborhood and paying off debts. Then I just take out 50k out from my mattress per year until I die.
If you're a certain age and don't care about your estate you could do the same thing with a line of credit. Now I have negative net worth but I'm choosing not to work while maintaining a decent life.
There is a real, tangible difference between any of these scenarios (yours or mine) and having enough money to shape legislation or buy yourself into the fucking Whitehouse. That just happens to be roughly the difference between ~1 million (living comfortably) and 1+ billion (buying lobbyists)
When is rich to you? Is it $100k? $500k? Or just when you have to start adding "-illion" to the number? Is a 25 year old who worked for 5 years with 100k as rich as someone who worked for 50 years to get 10x that?
The gap does matter, it's not our fault you can't comprehend the magnitude of these gaps
$18,000 is only $3k above the federal poverty level, and well below for a family of 2. This sounds like one of those out of touch McDonald's PR budgets.
Better hope your home never needs a new roof, that'll be at LEAST 6 months of your passive income gone. Car breaks down? Well you need to fix that because you live in BFE, that's another month gone.
Not to mention I don't know what scooter you're parking in your one room shack to keep taxes and insurance and utilities under $600. Are you fitting health insurance in that too or just offing yourself when you get medical debt? Hope you never have any dependants either, that's when things get really pricey.
His motivation is pretty clear if you actually look at his political career. You may agree or disagree with him but the way you're trying to tear into him just shows you don't have a grasp of the actual problem he presents.
You can go read his tax returns yourself. His income most years is his salary, boosted several times by the release of his books after his popularity. This in total has netted him a few million. You can argue his books should have been published for free, but it's not some shady stock manipulation.
This site is a good visualization. I'm not sure if it's up to date but the top end has only gotten bigger. You're arguing about something on the first screen scroll. By the end of the decade we're likely to see our first TRILLIONAIRE...
They made a hologram of Tupac, I'm sure they could figure something out
The Federal Election Commission has determined that your state had a fraudulent election. Please remain calm while our jackboots personally conduct a recount...
You really don't have to consciously consume it. You can literally leave auto-play on YouTube and it will steadily pull you down the rabbit hole. These people aren't logging in to nazi.com and ravenously looking for content (at least most aren't).
It's served directly to them in mainstream platforms, prepared exactly how they like it. And they're the first generation to be bombarded by this algorithmic targeting for their entire lives.
Should adults still be responsible for what they consume and analyzing it critically? Of course. But given we're in unprecedented territory and this is (at most) their second time voting in a presidential cycle, I'll give them a mulligan.
Why would they have to buy it again? They already own it.
I agree it is disappointing, but not enough people remember what it was like to be a confused and arrogant teenager. Let alone in the modern era where all their media comes from platforms funded by billionaires 24/7, politics hasn't had a shred of decorum in their conscious lifetimes, and the planet is undergoing multiple unprecedented crises.
A lot of people were the same age when GWB was signing the Patriot Act and didn't realize the consequences of his presidency until much later. Young people are impressionable but they do change.
Thanks for appreciating the struggle, I'll drink to that 🍻
I mean, apart from his money giving him a platform to really spread hate and hurt people, it really is pretty sad at an individual level. Dude is mentally unwell, and not just because he's an evil hateful person.
There's plenty of evil people just as bad and just as loud that are in control of their mental state and understand what they're doing.
Gutting your house and living in a utility closet is pretty messed up, rich or poor
Even looking strictly at the voting population, Trump got less than 50% of the votes; more people voted "not Trump" than voted for him. That's before you account for the majority of 90 million non-voters holding left leaning views (studies say irregular voters are as low as 40% republican voters) with either no acceptable candidate to support or living under voter suppression.
Did you know it's possible to with the presidency with as low as 23% of the popular vote? Guess which color states have a massively oversized impact on the electoral college...
The people getting shot are not Trump voters at this point. More specifically, people that are opposed to absolutely destroying other countries are the first ones targeted.
Even if we all suffered perfectly evenly, only 22% of Americans voted for Trump. Please keep the other 78% in mind.
Putting aside whether or not that's anathema to the cause, I'm not sure how you'd "other" them in a meaningful way. The reason it works for the right is that they target groups who's members are publicly visible and can't voluntarily leave (LGBT+, minorities, foreign religions, etc...)
If you target a group of people for their beliefs (something not overtly visible), they can either relabel their group or plausibly claim their beliefs differ in some way. We already do this for fascists and nazis, but very few people are going to outwardly admit to these ideals. Now they'll just say they're "extra-constitutional", "alt right", "Christian patriot", or any other hat a bigot wants to swap out for far right authoritarian.
You can't "other" them where they already proudly claim a majority (white + Christian) so what are you left with?
