![User banner](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/460b809e-4502-44ae-982d-3170ff31485e.png)
Fast-charging an EV for an hour would use the same amount of electricity a home would likely use in a day.
Why are medical devices operating on the same band as consumer devices??
There was personal information included in the data. Did no one actually read the article?
Big emphasis on the 'A'
Only idiots think Apple is privacy friendly lol.
Apple has everyone fooled.
Apple are privacy-focused insofar as they will privately sell your data, sneakily.
Had mine for over 20 years until it disappeared. Years later still no idea what happened to it. Only issue I had with it was the clock it had, broke halfway through owning it.
That shit ain't right! It's sad that those wannabe gyms exist and it puts off people who would likely otherwise have a good, albeit still tough time (with some conditioning).
Sounds like you've never trained. If you want to try kickboxing or Muay Thai you're not going to be starting out sparring. You'll be learning the basics. That is, of course unless you're at some dodgy ass gym that pushes everyone to spar right out of the gate. In which case you should avoid and go to a proper gym. If you're getting many hard hits to the head in training starting out you're doing it wrong or your partner is an asshole. Just do it. I trained with other people in IT, I remember one guy was a C++ programmer. Stop over thinking it and go for it.
Ideas are easy. If you find the secret to sustainable implementation let me know.
Ja that's right, I knew it was a plant or something. Thanks!
Now you’ve outdone Google.
Alright, calm down. If they "outdid" Google, they would have their own SEO dreamland platform. All they did was work within the confines of Google's algorithms, A/B testing until something works. When Google makes changes they repeat. Overall the Internet is in a reeeeally shitty state due to the marketization of search results. There have been some things I have searched for whereby there were pages of what was essentially cloned articles. Many times I'm unable to even find what I'm looking for. Recent example, there was that article posted about that AI service / software that aimed to poison images, I don't remember the name. I tried searching for the actual software / website. I gave up and never found it through the utter bullshit "articles" all spouting the exact same thing and clearly taking advantage of the "freshness" and relevancy of the tool.
It is. Something something, using their likeness (in a commercial context).
Not sure if satire
All of those are outside activities, right? In my town we have flyers and stuff in a few different locations. At times I get annoyed I can't find information about events online, and then I think no it's actually a good thing.
Solutions Architect?
Was this a small company? Really sounds like time-wasting disguised as due diligence. I hope you at least had a nice chat with some of them.
12 interviews?? Jesus. I would love to hear more. What was each for?
The landscape of tech recruitment is like a rollercoaster ride--thrilling, unpredictable, and often leaving us with more questions than answers. Lately, it seems like the industry is introducing some bizarre practices that have both employers and job seekers scratching their heads. Let's plunge into this tangled web of tech recruitment trends.
Generic Job Descriptions: A Bane or Boon? Job descriptions are often the first handshake between a company and a potential candidate. But have you noticed how eerily similar they’ve become? It's like a weird case of deja vu with every new job ad! Is the overuse of templates diluting the essence of job roles? Share your experiences!
Anecdote to help spark discussion: A software developer recounts, “After going through dozens of job listings, they all seemed to merge into one. It was hard to discern what each company truly valued.”
Marathon Interviews: Rigorous or Ridiculous? Gone are the days of a two or three-step interview process. Now, it’s like running a gauntlet with endless rounds of technical and behavioral assessments. Is this thoroughness necessary, or are we just scaring away top talent?
Another anecdote to help spark discussion: This one from the perspective of a data scientist, “I was in the interview process with a tech company for over two months. Even after getting the job offer, I was exhausted and had second thoughts.”
HR and Tech Teams: Synced or Scattered? The gap between HR departments and tech teams can be like two worlds apart. How often have you faced misaligned expectations or miscommunications due to this disconnect?
Final discussion-y anecdote: A backend developer's perspective, “HR pushed the idea of a programming language that the tech team was phasing out. It raised questions about the company’s internal communication.”
While it's great that tech recruitment is evolving, is it evolving in the right direction? Is it evolving at a fast enough pace? What about communication? How can we make the recruitment process more efficient, clear, and human-centered?
I'd love to get your perspective on all this!
That's perfect. There was a thread not too long ago discussing how Amazon Prime removed am item from someone's media library and gave them $5 as "compensation". Imagine someone coming into your house and taking something they don't sell anymore and leaving 5 bucks on your kitchen counter for your troubles. So many people in this world want their cake and eat it too, you can't have it both ways. If it was agreed that buying a digital asset conferred some type of ownership, they might have an argument now. They made their bed, now they can piss off and do what they want with it, it's theirs to do with as they please because we can never own a part of it.
That's perfect. There was a thread not too long ago discussing how Amazon Prime removed am item from someone's media library and gave them $5 as "compensation". Imagine someone coming into your house and taking something they don't sell anymore and leaving 5 bucks on your kitchen counter for your troubles. So many people in this world want their cake and eat it too, you can't have it both ways. If it was agreed that buying a digital asset conferred some type of ownership, they might have an argument now. They made their bed, now they can piss off and do what they want with it, it's theirs to do with as they please because we can never own a part of it.
I 'upvote' more or less all posts I interact with (sometimes I forget to vote). I feel like we should bring back open dialogues and heavily dissuade people from simply disregarding someone's entire belief system or ideals based on 200 characters of text (an example).
Think about one person in your life who you first thought was a complete asshole and once you got to know them they were pretty cool, maybe you became best friends with them. The point is, judging a person based on a minute snippet in time is a fool's errand, and your own state of mind contributes a lot to your own judgement of people. Your next thought might be, well they have a history of x, y AND z, so they deserve every bit of judgement coming their way! I would ask you, why? Are you not simply fueling further hatred, vitriol and division? So instead of stopping for a moment and thinking about the world from someone else's perspective, you'd rather just spit out some more hatred and move on like that person doesn't exist?
I would love to see some solution to the shitty state of the Internet. I only say Internet because for the most part this doesn't happen in real life in my experience. I think it has to do with consequences and social sigma and so on. I reckon it would be pretty awesome if there was something like the following:
- all upvotes are free range, people can give out upvotes like they were candy
- downvotes come at a "cost", whereby if you want to downvote someone you have to reply directly to them with some justification, say minimum number of characters, words, etc.
In an ideal world, and setup, this would help raise positivity in the world and have people at the very least have a second thought before being negative.
Yes I understand there would be flaws, I've worked with and used computers for a long time, I know. I chose not to delve deep into those as I feel that would defeat the purpose of the message I'm trying to convey. And, you know, lead by example.
What do ya'll think? Any suggestions to boost positivity in the world, I'm all ears, smash them and any other thoughts in the comments.
Continuing 'The True Tales of Recruitment Nightmares'
Once upon a chilly October, as the leaves crumbled under the eerie whisper of the wind, a recruitment agency named Hire Horrors Inc. decided to host a Halloween-themed recruitment drive. It was an event that promised to blend the spooky season with the professional realm, humorously termed The Walking Deadly.
As the D-day dawned with a gray, overcast sky, the agency's halls were decked out in eerie decor, complete with cobwebs in the corners and eerie whispers in the air. Each recruiter was dressed as a well-known horror character, while the candidates were invited to embody the essence of zombies - a metaphor for the mindless, task of job hunting. A rut we've all likely found ourselves in at one point of another.
However, among the candidates, one stood out - a fellow named Edgar, who took the theme a little too literally. He arrived dressed as a grotesque zombie, with an unsettling, realistic demeanor to match. His responses were simple grunts, his resume was a tattered piece of parchment, and his references were all ghosts of recruiters past.
As he shuffled from one recruiter to the next, the humor of the situation began to morph into something quite unsettling. The recruiters, initially amused, found themselves facing the existential horrors of the recruitment industry - the mindless drilling of skills, the haunting chase for the perfect candidate, and the ghostly silence that often met their calls and emails.
As Edgar shuffled out of the doors of Hire Horrors Inc., the eerie ambiance left behind served as a mirror to the recruiters, reflecting the robotic, often soul-draining nature of the recruitment process.
What do you think about this tale:
- Have you ever experienced a 'zombie-like' phase in your job hunting journey? What brought you back to life?
- What are the existential horrors you've faced in the recruitment process, either as a recruiter or a candidate?
- How can we bring more creativity, humor, and humanity into the recruitment industry to escape the 'Walking Deadly' syndrome?
- Share your own spooky or humorous recruitment tales.
That's it for now as always, good luck, stay safe and be well.
![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/171a7b65-8fc6-4253-9255-2d4f8d640d9c.jpeg?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
Yes, now it looks like frankenshelf. Adds character. What do you think?
Hello fellow warriors of the recruiting realm!
It's been eerily quiet here lately, and we all know that the world of recruitment hasn't suddenly become a walk in the park. Ghosting, baffling job descriptions, endless interviews... sound familiar?
Why not share your recent tales? Whether they're horror stories or surprising successes, we're here to listen, vent, and perhaps share a laugh or two.
So, grab your keyboard and let's dive back into the recruiting abyss together. We've missed hearing from you!
![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/766c3439-f437-41c0-805f-441abf486ab9.png?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
Would you pick up on this if you were in a hurry and happen to be expecting a package? (imagine it's in English 😅) What immediately catches your eye?
Hello everyone,
Currently, I've been using Descript for editing, but I've encountered some limitations:
- The Descript app is not available for Linux.
- The browser-based version has limited features.
I don't want to switch from Linux just for this. I'm searching for an alternative that is both fully compatible and feature-rich. Ideally, the alternative should have:
- Multi-track editing
- Transcription services
- Easy-to-use interface
- Help me spend minimal time editing without hiring someone 😅
I'd love to hear your recommendations and experiences with other platforms that fulfill these criteria.
Thank you for taking the time to read this. Looking forward to your suggestions!
Hello everyone,
As someone with a background and deep passion for security, I've navigated the labyrinthine world of not only tech recruitment, but others as well, more than a few times. I've encountered a myriad of challenges that I believe many of us face but seldom discuss openly.
Generic Job Descriptions: Has anyone else noticed how many job descriptions in tech seem like they were written from a template? It's frustrating to sift through dozens of job descriptions only to find they all seem eerily similar, making it challenging to understand what a company is truly looking for.
The Never-Ending Interview Process: Multiple rounds of interviews, technical assessments, and then maybe a 'cultural fit' interview. The process can be draining and time-consuming.
I'm keen to open a discussion and hear your thoughts and experiences.
- Have you faced similar challenges in tech recruitment?
- How do you navigate the complexities?
- Any tips for job seekers in tech, especially those interested in security?
Let's discuss!
![hiremenot_recruiter](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/644dfc3f-ce63-4363-b572-4435c59bf9e5.png?format=webp&thumbnail=64)
'Recruiter' for my podcast, Hire Me Not. The podcast that exists because recruiters are terrible. https://hiremenotpodcast.com