we can't implement common sense restrictions because the nuts have a panic attack if they're not constantly armed.
Do you honestly think that panic attacks by gun carriers is the blocker to reasonable gun laws? The number of people that carry firearms regularly is not statistically significant, let alone those with panic attacks.
I carry a concealed firearm because I think it's important for at risk groups to be able to defend themselves. I don't panic when I don't carry, but I recognize that I'm less prepared to defend myself from assault.
It's important to understand those you disagree with.
Why do you assume they are absolutely fucking terrified vs thinking better safe than sorry?
I know the risk of a violent encounter is low, but I carry because it's the only reliable way to not be at a disadvantage in a fight.
Having a plan to avoid being assaulted isn't the same as living in terror.
Protip - if some group seems totally ridiculous, there's a good chance you don't understand something important.
it will be interesting to see if NFTs are "properly" implemented using the web browser DRM that Google is creating
Subspace - Meet people from all over the world, and then kill them.
One of the first online multiplayer games. It has a very long skill curve, and a ton of variety in game types.
It's still alive in Steam as Continuum!
steam's proton extension (or mod, whatever) to wine has really increased the number of games that run well in wine.
these days most productivity "apps" are just web based, so wine isn't as relevant.
I keep a Windows partition around for a little better (~10%) performance in intensive games, but plan to ditch it when I upgrade my CPU.
you're right, it's a security issue!
client UIs must make it easy to keep track of who is who.