Skip Navigation
I like the web app more.
  • 'in my eyes'

    That is the entire crux of the argument. And thank God that the 80-85% of the devs don't feel averse to the entire concept of purchasing power parity.

    If you haven't dabbled in activities/studies as to how one can reduce the value factor while relying on the volume to not only start making some profit BUT ALSO ensuring the 'first mover's advantage', this will be a long drawn and possibly a futile discussion. I have said what was required, while having first hand experience of interacting with the devs who agreed, so that is it from my side. Ciao.

  • I like the web app more.
  • And i will tell you that a good number of devs have indeed reduced the pricing when I have pointed out the anomaly... Including a very relevant app developer.

    The basics of business is to sell the commodity enough to make profit on the investment. If you have enough buyers, you can lower the pricing. Else somebody else struts out and steals the potential user base, the exorbitant pricing strategy for a considerable user base will come down to a naught.

  • I like the web app more.
  • Wow. What a dumbass comment. :D I hope the lines of insulin makers are not seeing the evidence of lack of brains right here. Else they will never get the things done right.

    I don't see your companies not making a beeline for the Asian labor. If you cannot comprehend that purchasing power parity is a concept well rooted and not a route to present the begging bowl, you ought to spend sometime reading or amongst learned people.

  • I like the web app more.
  • No. Google doesn't automatically prices the apps in accordance to purchasing power parity. Many devs are not even aware of this. The setting is available for the devs and only some of them change the pricing according to how it should be for that particular region.

  • Android users who don't use the stock launcher - what launcher do you use, and what do you like about it?
  • You should revisit the words and the tone of your response. If its a genuine question, it definitely is lacking in presentation.

    Anyways. If you indeed are looking for an answer, Nova has been acquired by a company that generates revenue via harvesting the user data. And ever since apple brought in privacy rule changes, Branch's scope on iDevices has gone for a toss, which meant that the focus on android increased more. iirc, it was after or around that time that Nova got took over.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SI
    Silversw0rd @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 30