Most of the smaller banks in the UK are gone. We don't have a lot of "town banks".
The risks to the US may be very different from here. Either that or you could be guilty of catastrophising.
Hyperinflation doesn't happen that quick.
Not all banks go pop at once. Usually when banks go bust in UK, the gov steps in, recovers them and sells after. Many banks are perceived as too big to fail.
False, and I'll assume you are American.
In the UK, you are protected up to £85k per bank.
https://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover/
Government regulation can protect people. I know that concept seems crazy in USA.
They claimed it because she was married to a CIA employee.
Kind of free reign to break the law and kill people if you're a relative of a CIA employee. She could have been trialed without any risk to national security, so it's absolutely a BS excuse.
Well the centre left isn't centre left. They went right of the conservatives on immigration, focussing on stopping migrant boats etc. They vowed not to raise taxes to fund services. They didn't market themselves as centre-left. It was the right wing that took over the labour party. Historically you would find differences electorally prior to this one.
If you look at men to women voting Reform, it's 17% to 12%. There are disparities, they are just less obvious.
As Don Lemon found out, Elon doesnt like uncomfortable questions. He likes attention though.
Not so much in the case of the killer of Harry Dunn.
Probably because their list price was too high. Doesn't mean they're all that inflated.
Labour does have a process for policies. It is called the National Policy Forum. He ignores it. So your suggestion that you can push internally is false. Keir doesn't tolerate dissent because he's an autocrat.
Labour used to get most funding from unions, it's now less than 30%, so wealthy business folk got control of that.
It's a shame that Keir's labour doesn't have policies that aren't cruel on people.
That poster has a point. I'm a Brit here, so no skin in the game. You're more focussed on being right that trying to comprehend that people look at things differently.
No one thought Biden was good, but he was the candidate and most know that name recognition is key in US elections. Most presential candidates fail on their first run. Kamala, despite having some OK polling numbers still has to get through to disengaged American voters who do not follow politics and probably know little more than the attack lines heropponents will throw at her this campaign. They have to define her before others do. This option is riskier than you realise, the only thing that changed was Biden became a riskier option than before.
Things are less black and white than you want them to be. Nuance and grey area is key, despite being inconvenient.
If they were competent academics, they'd know the culture wars were manufactured, and to be aware that politicians can shape public discourse then disregard this and assume they must bow to and react to manufactured discourse is weird and illogical.
Absorbing your opponents positions isn't useful, especially when large swathes of your support is resisting the erosion of civil rights. You'd just erode your own support and suppress your own turnout.
It isn't rocket science. You recruit from the market or train your own.
It's painful they do not get this.
Or-der.... Or-derrrrr?
Yup, and for the avoidance of doubt:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg3j131327yo (see graph at bottom)
Labour used to be funded by trade unions. Now it's just a 5th of total funding. Corporate takeover of the Labour party. Of course, businesses will be wanting a return on investment here.
So Tories screwed our economic situations and Keir's Labour will keep us here.
What is the point in a massive majority if you'll do what the predecessors did? Power for power's sake?
Streeting is a Tory with a red rosette. From the right-wing Blairite faction (Progress) and one of the most disloyal and unprofessional politicians when Corbyn was leader.
Expectations of better in this guy would be misplaced.