![User banner](https://media.kbin.social/media/12/1f/121f906294fee8bda4c17c23d534b1f7c3093f968a416b3bc972eb637ee42bc2.jpg)
Yeah. That's what I said
In this case, the "lemmy devs" and the operators of lemmy.ml are the same people and it's hosted within EU.
But - that's still a far cry from getting any kind of GDPR violation report going, much less getting it through the process to actual fines.
People like to bring up GDPR violations as a some kind of super-moderator tool, but it isn't that easy and it definitely isn't automated.
Effect of ActivityPub, not Lemmy. All federating systems function similarly, because it's a feature of the protocol.
If instances want, they can ignore delete requests and your content stays in their cache forever (remember Pleroma nazis from couple of years ago?) - now, that is an instance problem that might be a GDPR issue, but good luck reporting it to anyone who cares. At best you can block and defederate, but that doesn't mean your posts are removed.
The fediverse has no privacy, it's "public Internet". Probably a good idea to treat it as such.
It's also a matter of scale. FB has 3 billion users and it's all centralized. They are able to police that. Their Trust and Safety team is large (which has its own problems, because they outsource that - but that's another story). The fedi is somewhere around 11M (according to fedidb.org).
The federated model doesn't really "remove" anything, it just segregates the network to "moderated, good instances" and "others".
I don't think most fedi admins are actually following the law by reporting CSAM to the police (because that kind of thing requires a lot resources), they just remove it from their servers and defederate. Bottom line is that the protocols and tools built to combat CSAM don't work too well in the context of federated networks - we need new tools and new reporting protocols.
Reading the Stanford Internet Observatory report on fedi CSAM gives a pretty good picture of the current situation, it is fairly fresh:
https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/news/addressing-child-exploitation-federated-social-media
I find it interesting that Meta Platforms, Inc., a company known for harvesting user data, is blocking some servers from fetching its public posts. They decided to implement a feature Mastodon calls Authorized fetch.
This was always going to happen. They will block agressively, because they can't have their precious advertising money mixed with CSAM, nazis and other illegal content. And the fedi is full of that.
I hope not
I've been using Debian since 1.3. Haven't really ever needed anything else.
I did "experiment" a bit when the decision to go with systemd was taken, but in the end, most distros went with it and it really isn't that big deal for me.
So it's just Debian. I need a computer that works.
How is Lando higher than Rovanperä? WTF? What championship did he win? Or better.. did he actually win anything at all this year?
Pleroma in that case I guess
Gates is probably just as bad and evil as the global 0.1%:er billionaire cabal members come, but that site gave me a crackpot conspiracy brainrot.
Erin Kissane posted a long and well researched article about Threads federation risks and trust and safety issues around Meta. If you're taking part in the debate and discussions about Threads federation - or if you're instance admin on the fence - you should really read this.
It's wild that a site with hundreds of millions of users, didn't invest into multiple-account deletion tools.
True start-up mentality, that one.
Just shows how our "critical" social media is really just some hasty tape and bubblegum behind the scenes to keep the front from falling apart.
As is the case normally with these "exodus" things, most people went back to Reddit after the first month here.
I guess majority on fedi are dumbasses in that case ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Mastodon is pretty fucked up anyway because everyone is on mastodon.social.
![](https://media.kbin.social/media/28/42/28423726b028238f808bb3ad01b768850568d1193b86388916caa7895ecc0ab8.png?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
Adam Mosseri shared Threads roadmap for the near future. It's not entirely surprising, but looks like they're working towards "full" federation support with profile portability.
Because the people signed the pact did it long time ago, before any details about Threads federation was known. It was a typical fedi kneejerk reaction.
It's a silly hashtag för instances that are in a "pact" to block Threads
Somehow I don't think many instance admins have resources or knowhow to drive legal processes against Meta?
And while a disclaimer on the instance page might have some effect, the Federation protocol makes it hard to avoid getting a copy of the said content in your cache.
Why spend the money up front? That's just bad business.
Yeah agreed. They're building a multi-million dollar social network - why spend all that money up front when they could have just installed small anonymous Pleroma on Raspberry Pi for under 100 bucks if they'd wanted to mine our data.
I don't think fedi is their "target".
I bet he does. You can block/mute influencers pretty easily and you can block the whole domain if you so wish.
He's talking about some kind of nefarious ad injection into ActivityPub objects as part of server to server activities.
Sultan Al Jaber – Cop28 president and CEO of state oil firm – is ‘ally the climate movement needs’, posts say
An army of fake social media accounts on Twitter and the blogging site Medium have been promoting and defending the controversial hosting of a UN climate summit by the United Arab Emirates.
The Meta chief is hoping Threads, his new Instagram-linked app, will beat Twitter on numbers.
![Thirty million join Meta's Twitter rival Threads, Zuckerberg says](https://lemdro.id/pictrs/image/f0c45682-d5c6-4560-85f2-728335f83ff7.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
So I guess today they'll pass the entire userbase of the fediverse. Expected, but it'll sure be Interesting Times watching the division this will cause with server de-federations.
Oh well.
Hello Detroit!
Swedish hockeyfan coming in peace!
Hockeymedia has been speculating about San Jose wanting to trade EK65 during the summer. He wants to go to a team that can make a run for the cup and compete - and that team will also have to have cap to take in his contract. Even if the Sharks retain salary, I'd guess he'd be around $8M.
I've been thinking - maybe he could be a piece in Yzerplan? Does it make any sense to you guys?
![0xtero](https://media.kbin.social/media/00/94/00941e2abe5e0fe5591a80b3d404edd5737c69dd83be9cb68768acd0754a9335.jpg?format=webp&thumbnail=64)
First I drink the coffee, then I do the things.
Cybersecurity specialist. Perpetual blue team botherer and a glorified network janitor. SecurityFest Crew (https://securityfest.com/)
Trying to leave things better than I found them. Slow regard of silent things.
\#infosec #security #cybersecurity #dfir #coffee #climate #sustainability #solarpunk
About Me: https://0xtero.hanninen.eu/ Mastodon: https://infosec.exchange/@0xtero