I don't know how much more clearer I have to rule on this. It's the exact same thing.
alt text: A screenshot of a comment thread by two people. OP comment says "What's the difference between git and GitHub" and the replying comment says "like the difference between porn and pornhub"
So these states that are imposing these measures and forcing porn sites like pornhub to pull out, are doing it “for the children”
But the only porn sites that comply are the ones who are trying to legitimize themselves to protect people. Like porn hub lost over 1/3 of their catalogue over the verification of the actors in their content. To remove revenge porn and other abuse.
That forces everyone to use the porn sites that do not care about exploitation nor the rules of these states. Pushing people tword crime like prohibition.
And still nothing stops children from binging porn
I love the idea of Fossil -- tools like a wiki, issue tracker, automatic synchronization, all built in, plus the more resilient on-disk format, are features Git should've had from the get-go (no pun intended), and having everything, web server to CLI wrapped up in a single binary is an extremely cool way to do it.
I want to switch to it, I really do, but git commit --amend is just not something that I am prepared to live without