'Hell on wheels': Teen convicted of crashing car at 100 mph, killing boyfriend and friend

The reason why they say this was murder:

Two weeks before the crash, she allegedly threatened to crash her vehicle when she was driving with Russo because she was upset over a disagreement they had. Russo called his mother and asked to be picked up, and a friend ended up retrieving him. In a phone call with Russo, the friend allegedly overheard Shirilla say, “I will crash this car right now,” prosecutors said in court documents.

This isn't a drunk driver, or a thrillseeker, this is someone with murderous intent.

Considering she was unconscious as well, sounds like it was a murder/suicide attempt.
Sounds more like a mental health issue tbh...
- I agree 100 percent this is a child with some kind of inability to understand the consequences of her actions she should be placed in a care facility until she demonstrates the ability to make proper decision making ability
- In most US jurisdictions if you're "just" trying to commit a felony, like purposely crashing your car at 100+ MPH (160+ KPH) to cause grievous bodily harm to others, and someone dies as a result that's automatically elevated to murder.
- It'll depend on the jurisdiction. But 'intent' for murder does not mean "pre-planned". Heat of the moment intention to do serious harm is enough for a murder conviction in the UK (and, I believe, the US).
  In this case, the prosecution accused her of pre-planning as well as intent, and the jury agreed with one or both arguments.
  Russo, the judge, delivered a scalding description of the case before she read out the verdict, saying Shirilla had a "mission" she executed with "precision" that fateful day — and "the mission was death."
  “The [crash] video clearly shows the purpose and intent of the defendant. She chose a course of death and destruction that day,” Russo said.
  “She morphs from a responsible driver to literal hell on wheels as she makes her way down the street,” Russo said, saying Shirilla made a calculated decision to drive that morning, when not many people would be around, on an obscure route she did not routinely take.
  Prosecutor Michael O’Malley told NBC affiliate WKYC of Cleveland that the crash video was damning, saying, “The intent was obvious upon seeing that video that there was only one goal.”
- Murder laws can vary by country.
  She murdered two people with the intent to at least cause significant harm. That's enough on the state she was in, thank God. She deserves life in prison.
Sounds more like a suicide/self harm thing to me.
- When you include an unconsenting person in the attempt, it is also murder.
- It sounds much more like an abusive relationship. She was trying to punish him, regardless of the risk to herself.
- If you attempt to kill yourself and take other people with you, it's commonly called murder/suicide. Killing people with intent is usually murder.
- A woman kills family then kills self. Is it murder?!!!! Oh. No, just self-harm.
- If you're trying to kill others along with you, it's not just suicide, it's also murder.
- This is why suicidal people are dangerous, it's a relatively small change from killing yourself, to killing others.

Fucking hell that is horrible. And of course she's the only one to survive. 100mph into a brick building has probably left her pretty physically fucked up and in constant pain. Hope she enjoys feeling that way in prison for the rest of her life.

She'll spend 8 months in prison and appeal for a reduced sentence and get out on "good behavior" before she's even served a quarter of her term. Don't you know how the American legal system works?
- Murder is a felony, so I believe you have to serve 80% of a sentence before being able to be eligible for parole

More of this. Also let's start holding rich people accountable of crimes also.

I am truly sorry for the passengers. Lost life because of teenage perceived hardship is tragic.

From a different perspective, it seems incredibly impressive that anyone survived a deliberate head on collision with a brick wall (that appears to have barely buckled) at 100 MPH / 161 KMH.

Thanks for the Christianization of the speed units, God bless you
Survived and still standing on her feet...
Not just survived, but with everything intact. No missing limbs or massive head trauma. She's wildly lucky in that reguard.
- Something tells me the judge will make her feel a bit less lucky within a few days.
  I'd be surprised if she gets out within 20 years
- Or wildly unlucky, depending on how one looks at it.
- Lucky or a very impressive feat of engineering in modern cars? 😱

Remind me why we allow teenagers to drive 3-ton vehicles again?

"Gotta get them teens to work. And no public transit options please, they make my money pile smaller."
-CEO's everywhere
Why do we allow most people to drive 3 ton vehicles
- Right? I honestly can't wait until self driving cars take up enough of the market share that manual driving cars will be outlawed (or at least getting insurance on them will be astronomically expensive)
Remind the rest of us why anycunt needs a 3 ton personal vehicle again?
- At risk of angering the vast majority of the fuck cars community, it's generally because I live 30 minutes from my job by highway, and can't afford to live within walking distance. And they won't let us telework. I really really want to actually live close enough to bike.
- So we have a large reoccurring expense that forces us to always have a job and stay productive in a modern society where this really isn't necessary?
Because the vast majority of them don't use the 3ton vehicle to commit murder.
You do know that adults use vehicles as murder weapons also, yeah?
- I am sure they don't.
So they can be exploited for cheep labor.
The same reason we all have a personal 3 ton vehicle: to ensure we remain bound to a culture of sprawling roads and fossil fuel consumption.
When I think back to how immature and reckless I was as a teenager I can't believe I was legally allowed to drive and considered a full grown adult at the age of 18.
Remind me why we allow banks to control our economy again?
tbp the camry she drove was closer to 1.5 tons
Awesome. Judge all teenagers because of a deranged one.
What's your stance on 27 year olds with driver's licenses?
- Yeah buddy i'm going to judge all drivers, because i kinda sorta vaguely don't want me or others to die!
  Are you against gun control too?
Freedums!
So they can be exploited for cheap labor.
- You're not wrong. Being able to drive by 16 so that you can start working is the capitalist way.
A Camry weighs half of that, and regardless, she could have done this in any vehicle
Bcs we lack the infrastructure for them not to require a car & obviously want car companies, roadworks, and petrol industries to continue having huge profits.
Lol which vehicles weigh 3 tons. Aside from EVs. You mean 3 tons as in 6600 lbs right?
She was 18. That's an adult.
- She was 17. But I understand your point.
- Legally sure, still immature and not someone who should be piloting a heavy vehicle capable of going 100 mph.
  Most people aren't, frankly.

Prosecutor: What gear were you in at the moment of impact?

Defendant: Gucci sweats and Reebok Classics.

There are a lot of people in this post spouting their opinion on an article they very clearly did not read.

The mum of one of the dead put it well - justice was served but nobody won today.
- Winning was not the goal anyway? Its not a game

Jesus, I sympathize, this is awful...i was t-boned by a teen going 85 mph, I wish my attorneys had the same teeth this judge does

I'm sorry that happened... but that's not why she said it. This girl accelerated full speed, without attempting to slow down at all, straight into a brick wall. Those teens probably weren't trying to hit you, this girl very very very likely was trying to hit that wall and kill everyone in the car.
- That's my bad, I did a no-no and commented before I'd finished reading the whole article

Wow the way she's crying is disgusting, she's just sorry for herself not for the deaths she caused. No remorse, only regret for getting sentenced

Wow the way she’s crying is disgusting, she’s just sorry for herself not for the deaths she caused. No remorse, only regret for getting sentenced
How do you know that? I don’t know about you but I’ve done things in anger that I felt genuine remorse for later.
Never killed anyone though, I suppose.
- Because of her intent and crimes- she had genuine murderous intent as the judgement said. She seemed very cruel and unhinged according to the article and presented evidence and the video showed her crying due to the judgement.
- Those look like Rittenhouse tears to me.
- Have a look: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12417047/Mackenzie-Shirilla-TikTok-doing-drugs-not-dying-jailed-murdering-boyfriend-friend-drugged-100mph-crash.html
If I was going to prison I would cry
It's something that people often forget (because they aren't like that themselves and have normal human reactions) is that narcisists, sociopaths, psychopaths and people with similar psychological disfunctions that make them act in "cold hearted" ways do feel.
However they feel only for themselves, never for others.
This is a bit unfair, though I didn't watch the trial in full. We have no idea if she cried for the other lives or not.
- It's unfair of me, but it is my perception and my opinion which is only based in observation yup.

Anyone with a legal background able to help me understand how two deaths resulted in 4 murder convictions and 2 vehicular homicide convictions?

I can say she was convicted of two counts of both R.C. 2903.02(A) & (B)—basically "normal" murder and felony murder. Clearly they thought she did it on purpose and because she was committing another felony. I can't say why those don't merge together under Ohio law or if they are supposed to. Ohio is a fairly statutory state, so maybe they overwrite that common law rule?
- Okay, felony murder makes sense as the other charges would be felonies. I don't care much for felony murder laws because I feel like they deincentivize careful action in law enforcement, but I definitely understand where if that law is in place she caught murder for the actual murder then felony murder subsequent to the assaults.
  Still feels weird that two dead people produced 6 homicide convictions though. Like, you killed them, that's 2 crimes. You killed them with a car, that's two more crimes. In the process of killing them with a car, which is a felony, you killed them. That's two more crimes.
Not a lawyer but I believe the charges can be sub cats of murder and homicide.
I would have to double check.

How did she survive unscathed, while her 2 passengers both died?

Edit: I found another article, she was not unscathed: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12417047/Mackenzie-Shirilla-TikTok-doing-drugs-not-dying-jailed-murdering-boyfriend-friend-drugged-100mph-crash.html

@Buffalox @MicroWave
Often the driver does survive catastrophic accidents vs front passengers.
https://emj.bmj.com/content/21/2/197
- Thank you, but that's a lot of reading for a simple question.
  Statistical analysis was by χ2 test; a p value of less than 0.05 was assumed to correlate with a significant difference in rates of injury.
  Oh yes it's all clear to me now.
  I know it used to be like that before air bags and safety belts, because the steering wheel takes some of the blow in frontal collisions. But such dramatic difference I suspected she might have made the collision worse for the passengers on purpose.
  PS She is probably a narcissist: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12417047/Mackenzie-Shirilla-TikTok-doing-drugs-not-dying-jailed-murdering-boyfriend-friend-drugged-100mph-crash.html
  PPS: The article I found describes that her survival was miraculous, and she had surgery.

This is an unbelievable tragedy, for all of them. She just turned 18, I wonder what her sentence will be like. I assume that in the US - unlike the situation over here in Europe - there is no special "juvenile justice" for young adults, so she might face multiple lifetimes in prison after being convicted for murder. If I remember correctly you can get separate sentences for each victim, which will sum up to your total sentence.

It's a tragedy for the victims and their families, but I'm sorry, I can't feel sorry for her. Seems she planned to harm them for petty reasons because she feels entitled. Probably a narcissist:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12417047/Mackenzie-Shirilla-TikTok-doing-drugs-not-dying-jailed-murdering-boyfriend-friend-drugged-100mph-crash.html
- No, the "juvenile justice" system in the US is... the American juvenile justice system
  It has its own judges, facilities, probation offices, and everything.
- Gotta keep those prisons stuffed. Glad to see absolutely zero consequences of a for profit system.
- When adult justice is applied, then there’s nothing “juvenile” in that. I guess the thinking behind that (over here) is that you are not yet a fully developed adult when you are 18 and that you might get another chance in life than when committing crimes at older ages.

Confused by the article. Is there a video from inside the car right before the crash?

there was video from CCTV and they also checked onboard computers and saw there were no attempts to slow down before collision
- That'll do it.

I wonder of she cried this much too for the two kids she killed. I think she needs a psychiatric institution instead of jail

If she insane she should and would have. She wasn't so reality just hit her.
- Just read up on her case. She deserves it. Fucking loon. Just die. Bye

There sure are a lot of young women named 'Mackenzie'.

Lots of fathers, born in the late 70s/early 80s, wanted a lifetime of "The Mac Dad 'ill make ya" jokes.
I think it is a nice name.
- Sounds like a sheep dog from new zealand

She should be in a psychiatric facility. She attempted suicide and murdered two people in the process.

Misread. 18 at time of arrest. Did this happen a month before her birthday?

This is an unbelievable tragedy, for all of them. She just turned 18, I wonder what her sentence will be like. I assume that in the US - unlike the situation over here in Europe - there is no special "juvenile justice" for young adults, so she might face multiple lifetimes in prison after being convicted for murder. If I remember correctly you can get separate sentences for each victim, which will sum up to your total sentence.

Let's see what kind of slap-on-the-wrist punishment she's going to get on Monday.

100% guaranteed that if the roles were reversed and an 18 year old boyfriend did this and ended up killing his girlfriend and friend, they would throw the book at him. Our society puts pussy on a pedestal and as such I expect her to get the lightest punishment possible.

Guys, she's 18. Her brain isn't even fully developed yet. She's not even capable of fully rationalizing the consequences of her actions yet. I know she did something awful but I don't think there are any winners here.

You don't need a fully developed brain to understand that intentionally driving into a brick wall at 100 mph will have severe consequences.
- I'm sure she did understand, she probably didn't think she'd survive, though, so any consequences of that possibility probably didn't occur to her at all.
According to Western societies, 18 is when the "fully developed" switch flips from OFF to ON, not a minute earlier or a minute later.

What a weird ass comment.
Shes 19.
All people around this age think they're invincible.
- Not all of them.
  But regardless, don't feed the trolls.
- Yeah. This is not the basis of my conclusion, but merely another in a centuries long line of examples.
Good troll. Go back to reddit, please.
- Why is this a troll?
I'm pretty sure reckless driving and whiteness are completely unrelated.
- Did they edit their comment?
Lol what. Honestly the depths of y’all’s stupidity still baffles me sometimes.
Did she crash because she’s a woman, too? Which was it, her whiteness or her womanhood that actually caused the accident? lol idiot
🤣