Skip Navigation
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs @lemmy.world grabyourmotherskeys @lemmy.world

Noticing a pattern (people who went to SOL Foundation Conference)

Ok, I have noticed a real tone change in people who were at the SOL Foundation Conference. I've listened to several podcasts where people are recounting their conference attendance experiences and also noticing a shift in both tone and how much background they will divulge.

  • solemn to a person... even Dave Foley was having a hard time with levity

  • on Spaced Out Radio Dr. Michael Masters (did not attend conf. afaik) discussed an abduction experience that he had previously related in a very somber way... sounded like a man who knew this sounded crazy but wanted it out there (is this a mental health crisis or a person who knows his revelation will make sense to everyone soon?)

" the Good Trouble recount was very serious and Matt Ford discussed how he was involved in getting a document into the congressional record, something he'll cover in a future episode

  • is it just me or have insiders become much more serious lately? It really seems like a change in tone, an increase in sharing details on things they would have only hinted at before, and generally a greater sense if urgency to bring the general public up to speed...

Thoughts?

2
2 comments

  • I think a big part of it is the empowerment from the subject being taken seriously. People are now willing to go into more detail and bring forward additional claims. SOL did a great job of uniting scientists, experts, and people with first hand knowledge. All those who attended or followed the event helped emboldened by each other. Even those who have spoken on the subject before are now more comfortable in opening up further. Their tones will vary from relief of opening up further to frustration that they've had stories that could never be taken seriously.

    The urgency is harder to explain. With politicians and government officials it makes sense to get ahead of whistleblowers and any uncontrolled disclosure. However, I can't say the same for UAP experts and talking heads. It could just be that empowerment breaking the flood gates and their eagerness to open up more coming across as urgent. Or they feel that larger news will break that will be harder to grasp without the public getting caught up to speed.

    I don't personally back or get wrapped up in any specific theories on why, but it definitely stirs the imagination. In any case, I think that 2024 should have a lot in store for disclosure.