Skip Navigation

Texas woman who sought court permission for abortion leaves state for the procedure, attorneys say

In Texas, Paxton mounted an aggressive defense to try to prevent Cox from having an abortion. He sent three Houston hospitals letters warning of legal consequences — both criminal and civil — if they allowed Cox’s physician to provide the procedure. He also argued that Cox had not demonstrated that her life was at imminent risk, including noting that she was sent home after her multiple visits to emergency rooms.

Cox had cesarean surgeries during her first two pregnancies. Her lawsuit argued that inducing labor would carry a risk of a uterine rupture because of her prior C-sections, and that another one at full term would would endanger her ability to carry another child. But Paxton contended those arguments still fell short.

Absolute fucking ghouls

6 comments
  • I'm hoping someone here with more American-history-and-current-federal/state-relationship-knowledge brainworms can answer this, but how close are we getting to a Fugitive Slave Act scenario where two states have conflicting laws and one refuses extradition to the other causing the necessity of a federal response to the situation?

    My limited understanding of this situation looks like:

    • Texas is saying this is murder and has passed laws that give them the ability to prosecute this person even if they get the procedure done outside of the state
    • California has laws saying they won't cooperate with states seeking to do the above
    • This scenario is happening across state lines which seems to put it in the federal government's purview

    Am I off base here or is this a similar scenario where the federal government is going to have to act/explicitly not act in a way that accelerates conflict between it and aligned/non-aligned states?

    Obligatory fuck all of these ghouls putting the woman in this scenario

6 comments