Snip:

The recent ceasefire declared between Iran and the U.S.-Israel axis might appear to be a temporary pause in escalating tensions. However, it reflects a deeper geopolitical reality: the Islamic Republic of Iran has not only withstood sustained pressure but, in many respects, has seized the strategic initiative.

[...]

Despite a direct attack on Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility—buried deep underground—the damage was minimal. Iran’s nuclear capabilities remained intact, and command structures resilient. In response, Iran launched missile and drone strikes on critical Israeli targets in Haifa, Tel Aviv, and sensitive military installations, effectively challenging the longstanding perception of Israel’s “absolute security.”

[...]

Perhaps more telling than battlefield dynamics is the psychological and political shift among the key players. For the first time in modern history, a regional state directly targeted U.S. military interests in West Asia—most notably the Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. Yet Washington’s reaction was not a retaliatory strike, but a rush toward de-escalation and calls for a ceasefire.

This shift in tone—from threats to mediation—signaled not strategic flexibility, but a recognition of limited options. Only days earlier, U.S. officials were publicly advocating regime change in Iran. After Iran’s direct retaliation, that rhetoric softened dramatically. President Donald Trump, for instance, pivoted from inflammatory remarks to calling for peace, stating: “May God protect Iran and Israel.”