The current board only consists of 3 people: Roman (@rtsisyk), Viktor (@vng), and Alexander (@biodranik). Major decisions can't be made if only 1 person objects.
Community contributors to Organic Maps have expressed serious concerns about the project's governance, transparency, and the potential for shareholder profit at the expense of the community. They are calling for a shift to a nonprofit structure, greater inclusivity in decision-making, and financial transparency, and are considering starting a new project if these issues are not addressed.
Probably not for now, but the main devs displayed some bad behavior iirc, so this might be an early fork in preperation for what might be on the horizon.
Yeah, I'm sorry but also the policy of OSM to not update road closures (and also no standard way to do it) until they reach a few months to a half year makes it almost useless for navigation in places with multiple construction projects throughout a year
I can get 20 minutes added to my 30 minute route trying to find a good detour because organic maps just keeps shoving me back to a closed route.
There is construction in different places 6-7 months of the year here. If I can't trust organic maps to get me to my destination, then it is useless as a car navigation tool and I can't switch from map services that update their maps frequently.
Organic Maps / CoMaps is not some corporate platform, you "migrating" to them does not gain them anything. If you have a constructive suggestion, open an issue or contact them.
I don't understand why you thought i was talking about bringing them benefits, but since you brought it up, I often donate to projects I use and do extensive testing on git branches on nearly all the software I can.
but regardless, I wasn't implying that it would benefit them at all.
What induced the fork? Out of the loop, apparently.
Here's an open letter to the Organic Maps Shareholders with the most info:
https://www.comaps.app/news/2025-04-16/1/
Which is referenced in the article here:
https://news.itsfoss.com/organic-maps-fork-comaps/
And discussed on the OpenSource community here:
https://lemmy.world/post/30461779
Basically some drama went down between the devs.
Edit: 'to' the shareholders, not from
Honestly none of that seems all that bad. Unless they start actively doing something very harmful I don't see any reason not to use Organic maps.
As long as the kayak links can't personally identify the user, I don't see any issue with this.
Setting up a nonprofit is hard. You can setup an LLC and run it like a nonprofit
Honestly, I think it's premature - Organic Maps isn't down the drain yet. But I'm also not 100% up to date. You can see most of the context here and in the open letter linked within: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/organic-maps-open-letter/128851