Speedboat that flipped midair in 200 mph crash wins race on Arizona lake

200 mph (322kph)
Everything but metric.
- kph is just a stupid way of saying km/h
- Am I missing something here? KPH is metric.
  
  "kph" is an americanization. the unit is km/h. i'm assuming the commenter did not know this since the first abbreviation is not used it most languages.
  
  Americans hate metric so much that they'd rather use metric!
  
  Maybe this is an SI purist and want to see meters per second or nothing? That would be silly because KPH is well used across the metric world, of course
- And a 'significant figures' failure too.

Is this the speedboat equivalent of doing a wheelie across the finish line on a bike?
Glad they’re ok.

What's a crash win?

Reminds me of the flying Mercedes CLR:
https://youtu.be/a9vD0R1fvZw
- There were two seoarate incidents. Mark Webber and another guy.

Sadly, they didn't win the Darwin award. There's always next year.
- Were these terrible people or are you just wishing death on random people for making a poor choice for their own safety?
  
  Not terrible people. At least the owner / one of the operators is a pretty awesome man.
  
  They were being reckless... to win the award, that's all it takes. Evolution takes its course.

Admittedly, I don't know much about modern speedboats, but the full flip probably saved their lives. In the old days, flipping onto your head at damn near 200 mph was certain death.
- Yea that flip and rotation definitely saved them, you can see in the video they slow down drastically in the air while the top of the boat was pointing mostly forward, although they likely also experienced some drastic gforce changes as it happened.
- Yeah, I was gonna say, did the pilot live?
  Good number of hydroplane/powerboat deaths/maimings over the years...
  
  Both lived and were not seriously injured.

k, it's time to wind down the whole we're-just-burning-fossil-fuels-for-fun stuff now.
- A lot of these racing applications are what drive innovations in power and efficiency in the rest of the automotive field since they're constantly improving engines to squeeze as much power out of them as they can. Banning this stuff will have little to no impact on pollution and just needlessly piss a bunch of people off, driving allies away from the cause.
  It's like the whole plastic straw ban that achieved nothing and made a bunch of people look like fools. Meanwhile, giant corporations are packaging items in single-use plastic packaging and using 10,000x as much plastic with nary a peep from those politicians' grandstanding over straws. Furthermore, every paper straw I've ever gotten has been wrapped in a plastic bag.
- i doubt the actual motorsports are the biggest carbon emissions of stuff like this
- Running boats like this for 10 seconds costs nothing compared to a mega yacht.
- Check out SailGP. It's got some flaws, but they did actually manage to design a sailboat race that goes fast enough to actually be interesting to watch in real-time.
- I mean, i'm certainly ok with a fully electric motorboat
  
  What do you do if you run out of electricity while out on the water? At least with an EV you can get out and walk but that's a different story on a boat.
- "STOP HAVING FUN!!"
- That time was like 30 years ago. Now we can either stop using them altogether and have a bad time, or we can keep using them and have a slightly more bad time.

Eh, anyone can do that mid-air. It takes skill to do it quarter-air.
/s

I guess these guys have never heard of ground effect or air compressing at high speed.
I'm guessing none of them want to admit to these effects if you want to keep a propeller in the water the whole time.
- Those effects are key to the design of these boats. They're essentially a wing.
  Water has a lot more drag than air, so the more the boat is out of the water, the faster it can go.
  
  Though it makes me wonder why they don't use actual wings to maintain control over the boat when it goes too far out of the water. Why isn't the ideal basically a plane that has a propeller sticking down into the water?

In all seriousness, I think that there might be a good argument, in 2025, for converting races, be they car or boat or whatnot, to be remotely-driven.
We've got the technology today.
It'd permit for higher speeds and suchlike, and eliminate some requirements.
The audience doesn't get the drama of the driver maybe being killed in an accident, but by-and-large, blood sport has faded into history.
There are clearly some people who watch racing for the crashes --- but it's possible to have the crashes and have vehicles potentially destroyed without the drivers being killed too.
- If theres no risk of complete assholes burning up or crumpling into a pancake during a car race then the race sucks ass.
- That defeats the whole point.
  
  Well, I suppose it depends on what people are out for. Like I said, if it's death that they're interested in, then, yeah, it would. But if they're okay with the crashes without the death, then I'd think that it'd be okay.
- Hahahah no. Humans haven't changed. We still love to gawk at death and pain. We just don't want to admit it directly.
  Rubber-neckers slowing down the highway for a crash on the other side aren't doing it to make sure they are safe. They are hoping to spot some gore.
  
  Unless you like TOOL.
  "I want to watch things die from a good safe distance. Vicariously, I live while the whole world dies."