Skip Navigation

Email signatures are harming the planet and could cost people their lives — it’s time to stop using them.

theconversation.com

Email signatures are harming the planet and could cost people their lives — it’s time to stop using them

Edit: A lot of people seem to hate on the article without reading it.

Here is a supporting scientific source, by the same author: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000863

The environmental impact of our online habits is far larger than most realize, and as digital communication continues to evolve, we must consider its long-term consequences on the environment and human life. We should take the easy steps of cutting wasteful energy use in our communications and it can start with eliminating email signatures.

55 comments
  • First let's cut the biggest energy wasters -- crypto mining and 'AI'.

  • My recent study explored the environmental impact of lengthening email signatures, focusing specifically on two types of information: gender pronouns and land acknowledgements because both are relatively new additions to email signatures.

    Uh huh.

  • The article and paper seem to be aimed at the set of people who hate pronouns intersected with the set of people who believe in anthropogenic climate change.

  • Paraphrasing a bit from the scientific source:

    If the population of Canada used email signatures for a year, ~30 people in developing countries will suffer a premature death within the next 100 years.

    That 100% should have been in the article in some clear form or another.

    I'm not against the points of the article, I'm against it being so poorly written that AI slop is just as good.

  • Well, I did delete a company-mandated image from the bottom of my signature after I realised that it made even just a one-line "Thanks" email balloon out to 800kb.

55 comments