This looks like an 80's marketing attempt to make a low class brand an ultra-high end brand. Except Jaguar is a high end brand already.
It appears that the overly masculine "jaguar" brand is becoming a very feminine looking brand. This feels like a cosmetics line more than a luxury automobile.
jaguar lipstick, for the animal in you. rawwwrrrrrrrr!
Jaguar was a high-end brand. They haven't actually been high-end in anything except price since Ford bought them in 1989, and then Tata Motors (an Indian company) in 2008. It's a shame too, because they used to be beautiful and elegant cars.
Ahhh, designers coming up with some stupid mistakewhich is then sold by the marketing department who just uses a lot of slick and fancy words to make it sound expensive
I heard they're not making any cars this year. They just stopped production to sell their existing inventory or something. Sales are way down. It surprises me because they make Land Rover and people really like those.
That's exactly why Jaguar is stopping production. Their best selling cars in recent years have been the SUV models by a long way to the point where the saloons were barely selling at all anymore, but that means they are eating into Landrover's market share. They are rolling the dice with this move because the alternative is to give in and retire the brand.
Am I missing some grammatical update that changes status verbs (is/are) to plural form when using a singular group name? "jaguar are doubling"? I keep seeing this across lemmy. Is it regional? American here, always taught "jaguar is" and "the band is" etc
Thanks, interesting. Does that occur in India as well? I suppose I can see the reasoning (Jaguar is made of thousands of people, so jaguar "are" deciding things as a group so plyralizing the verb gives identity to the individuals) but it still sounds awful to me. Then again, it's all about sound to me, right? I'd still say "The Beatles are deciding" despite being a group name.