‘NYTimes’ biased coverage of Amsterdam soccer violence attempts to hide Israeli racism
‘NYTimes’ biased coverage of Amsterdam soccer violence attempts to hide Israeli racism
The New York Times buried the fact that racist Israeli soccer fans instigated attacks in Amsterdam, and instead pushed a false narrative that the violence was driven by antisemitism.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/22369893
By James North
November 10, 2024
It's not just new York times. All our national news sources did the same. And since it happened here they should know better. Needless to say, it has been a huge eye opener... And guess what, they even asked: "is this terrorism?"
I read an article yesterday, may have been from CBS News or something??? It took FOURTEEN PARAGRAPHS before ANYTHING at all was mentioned about the "death to arab" chants and burning of Palestinian flags. Before and after that paragraph it was all talking about jews being chased down in the streets, it's horrifying that people would do this, in ashamed of our country, it was a pogrom....then just casually dropping the real reason it happened. I couldn't believe they even included that info at all
And even if it had been like what the reporting would have you believe: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6185867
This kind of analysis... I can tell you as a leftist... The NYT is closer to the GOP on everything but the DEI shit the Hillary dems used against Bernie that has metastasized into a cancer on their for nothing but paying Neera Tanden and Donna Brazil's bills party. The Left is labor solidarity forever and nothing else. DNC need not apply.
I can tell you as a leftist… The NYT is closer to the GOP
As a communist, I covered this in my first previously:
Also, in what universe is the neoliberal, anti-labor NYT center-left? And if The Grayzone in the ultraviolet territory, where does that leave the explicitly Communist Monthly Review, outside of MBFC’s Overton window? Surprise, it’s to the right of it
This kind of behavior is harmful to the legitimacy of journalism itself and entirely self defeating at pushing an agenda.
When journalism is mistrusted, misinformation is boosted. When people find out information is misrepresented, they will seek out other sources and be less likely to believe information even when it is legitimate.
We all lost today and the significance of this loss has not dawned on the news agencies. I really hope they don't come crying again about how journalism is dying because people don't care for buying newspapers anymore.
I really hope at some point we go back to the apolitical, strict facts representation and unbiased coverage of events. That's what journalism is supposed to be. Not this tailored version of events reporting that we often get.
Journalism has always been this way under capitalism. Journalists lied about Iraq. They lied about the Black Panther Party. They lied about Vietnam. The term "Yellow Journalism" came about in the 1890s to describe the inflammatory newspapers of the era.
Journalism has always been like this. The Edward R. Murrows and Walter Cronkites are the exception, not the rule, under capitalist news reporting because the entire industry relies on selling what sells, instead of broadcasting what informs.
A first miss from the paper known for the reliable reporting of Judy Miller. SAD!
Unexpected? No.
