Harri K. Hiltunen's answer: 1. Vannevar Bush invented the Memex crowd thinking desktop environment with redundancy-merging hypertext wiki 1939–1945.
He had designed analog computers and founded the Manhattan Project that produced the first nuclear bomb.
Memex was to increase humanity’s collecti...
"mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility"
"Wholly new forms of encyclopedias will appear, ready made with a mesh of associative trails running through them, ready to be dropped into the memex and there amplified."
"The inheritance from the master becomes, not only his additions to the world's record, but for his disciples the entire scaffolding by which they were erected."
(emphasis mine)
Memex remembers knowledge and its creation process to be immediately learned from and built upon. It self-organises, integrating added information to the common knowledge tree.
It was designed for crowd work on all human knowledge.
WWW does not remember - it works like a paper pile. You can’t see a mesh of associative trails running through WWW any more than through a paper pile. The mental scaffolding by which knowledge was erected is lost. You can’t drop a knowledge structure into WWW and expect any amplification to happen.
It was made for publishing, not processing.
Vannevar Bush squiggling alone in his outer brain about a shared outer brain:
“Konrad Zuse already made it from ones and zeros - it’s fast and precise. Let me show you how to make one.”
Bush replied “It’s hideous and boring! Twiddling knobs is so much gayer than pressing buttons!”
"I tweak this - that there resists. I let go - it returns under the force set by this slider. I flip this clutch - these three start arguing, and it’s all chaos! It wiggles! Then you tweak the adjusters until order emerges. The point is collaboration.”
“See, when I scale the main part, all the sub-parts inherit the change. Then I start the simulation and we’ll see if the chair can bear the weight. Easy as C-A-D.”
Douglas Engelbart, who had been inspired by Memex, looked at the new computers and the state of Earth’s collective intelligence.
He had a worry:
“What if an unforeseen danger is about to hit us? Can we solve the problem quickly enough? Doubtful.”
He had a vision:
"We should use computers to boost mankind's capability for coping with complex, urgent problems."
Luckily a rich company, Xerox, immediately grabbed the project. Whew!
At Xerox PARC Alan Kay (the Dynabook guy) made a user-programmable desktop development environment virtual machine Smalltalk on the first modern personal computer Xerox Alto (“interim Dynabook”) 1973.
Children loved its learnability.
Users loved its understandability: Transparent meanings all the way down to what makes it tick.
It was highly learnable, user editable, and crowd collaborable in an unlimited number of persistent, shared workspaces.
It was supposed to make everyone fluent in computers in the same way that Ford Model T with its complete manual for disassembly, maintenance, and repair had birthed a generation of Americans fluent in mechanics who then went on to win World War II, to the Moon, and higher up skyscrapers than ever.
“Learn this as a child:”
“Do this as an adult:”
“Let’s do the same with computers?”, suggests Alan Kay.
[End of preview]
As there is no import function to Lemmy from Quora, and copy-paste removes formatting and links, this is too tedious for me to rebuild here entirely. Go read the original. More about boring dystopia further down the article.
If you can't stand Quora, here's a copy with all videos broken and images scaled down, with scripts to "mail [dot] ru" for some reason according to NoScript in Firefox:
https://archive.ph/4Ka2l
The other archiving options offered didn't work.
I don't see the mention of typewriters. I think the most important UX comes from there, keyboard bottom - screen/paper on top, and this layout was already common in the 1880s. From this point of view Vannevar Bush just added a joystick on the right side, nothing else.
I said "More about boring dystopia further down the article". The collaborational approach to computing was tossed by the wayside several times over the decades, and the result is a dystopia.
The superficial layout of input and output devices makes maybe 3% of the UX talked about in the whole article. "Design is how it works."