Opinion: I'm a Republican who can't support Trump. I'm voting for Cornel West instead.
Opinion: I'm a Republican who can't support Trump. I'm voting for Cornel West instead.
I am a longtime Republican who feels disaffected from the mainstream Republican Party but who can't ignore the failures of the Democratic Party.
So you’re supporting trump.
"Socialist Mormon Satanist", aka UniversalMonk.
No, you're not. You're not any of the above.
I was raised Mormon, and I am an RM. I'm a Ricks College--now BYU-I--alumn. I had my records removed almost 20 years ago, was a born-again, evangelical atheist for a while, and I've been an active and open Satanist for the last 10.
Your online presence and words scream "active Mormon", not Satanist, or socialist. The things you promote--racism, misogyny, far-right ideology (such as, for instance, all the Ricks College garbage)--are in-line with both historical Mormonism as well as contemporary practices.
"Socialist Mormon Satanist", aka UniversalMonk
How many display name’s has monk gone through so far? Like four?
I think like, 6. I'll change it again when I decide to. Thank you! :)
Actually you don't get to tell me what I believe in or what I don't, friend. I get to choose that, not you.
When have I ever promoted racism, misogyny, are any far-right ideology?! What are you even going on about?!
But I’ve posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.
So, if you’re assuming I agree with every viewpoint in the articles I post, how does that even work when I share so many conflicting perspectives?!
No, you don't get to gaslight me by saying you believe one thing while acting in the opposite manner. Or, more correctly, you can try, but it's transparent to everyone.
You started are the sole moderator and poster of both a red-pill community, and a "transracial" community which is pretty clearly racist. You push candidates that are known to support the election odds of far-right candidates, and you push deeply socially regressive education institutions. These all add up to a person that is misogynistic, racist, and believes in far-right ideology. Or, in simpler terms, a typical Mormon.
You know everyone can see what you're posting, right? If you post, for instance, 20 things that are positive for Stein, 10 things critical of Harris, and 1 thing critical of Trump, what's the trend? That's a pretty strong pro-Trump trend, since Stein's own campaign has said that they're about blocking Harris, and they know they can't win.
And this? What you're doing right here? Sea lioning.
Monk's script:
- "I didn't write the article, I just posted it. " (even though posting propaganda is the same thing as writing it)
- "if you feel that the article is against the rules, let the mods know" (even though no one said Monk was breaking the rules by posting propaganda)
- "I'm not voting for Kamala or Trump" (even though a vote for third parties is just going to empower a vote for Trump)
- Some form of sarcastic, fake "thank you" even though no one asked for their thanks
This says a lot about West’s base lol
He has fewer Republicans endorsing him than Kamala does
Rates matter, not raw numbers
That’s a good thing.
Maybe, but I believe they’re just feeling alienated by the two-party system.
Yes, it's bad, and we'll fix it locally first with things like RCV.
I keep seeing your posts and I get where you're coming from. Early in my voting career I voted for Ralph Nader. I lived in MA at the time and I had hoped that a third party would get traction. I knew it didn't matter in MA, knowing that the Democrat would win my state. However, what you continuously encourage is very dangerous on a national level. It's very dangerous when Trump is the other option. It's almost like you want him to win.
"I live in California, where the electoral outcome we can take as settled. That fact affords me the luxury to vote my conscience."
Yeah, literally doesn't matter who they vote for.
At the very least, since it's a protest vote no matter what, I'm glad there's one more Republican with the balls to take a stance against the GOP guy.
I mean maybe I'm just in a state that give me this option others don't have, but the way I do that is voting for the candidate (in this case Kamala) but under the working families party as opposed to Democrat and I registered as an independent so
i'm not registered on a kill list when things go nuttythey show a loss of support.voting for the candidate (in this case Kamala) but under the working families party as opposed to Democrat
Do what now? You mean like on your ballot Kamala is listed twice?
USA Today - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for USA Today:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News