The bad faith actors will be doubling down this last month.

Third parties in the presidential campaign only allow people to vote in a non tactical way. If they actually want to do anything they should start on square one which is to get a single candidate into congress.

The strategy for presidential campaigns should always be to run, get the message across, watch polling, withdraw, endorse until they are big enough. When big enough then open up coalition talks and affect policy by promoting voter reform and couple of key policies.

Doing just the presidency is good for publicity but incredibly inadequate.

Or the democrats could deal with the fact that there is a substantial group of people that don't trust them or the republicans. Better not talk about why that might be right?
- I think there is definitely political space for a left wing populist anti establishment party, you can either do it with Bundnis Sahra Wagenknecht type of party proper anti corruption social democrat or green.
  
  Unfortunately the Green party is who everyone talks about but there are other third parties, and especially ones that participate in local elections more. I am interested in reading more about the Bundnis Sahra Wagenknecht party style though, thank you for referencing it.

This is not a post about supporting third parties, which is still pointless anyway. This is a post about third parties themselves doing nothing in non-election years. If you aren't a third party candidate this post isn't about you.

It is about them, just not in a positive way.

BTW, for some reason I have them tagged as "Tankie Dumpo", no idea why.

And you are no closer to accomplishing your goals....

There is a reason socialists in the US vote for the democratic party: we have influence in participation and have been granted concessions.

My goal is to never vote for the Dems or Republicans after 2016 so thanks for telling me I'm no closer but I think I am.

Knowing that I've made that commitment to myself let's me vote for the candidates I actually want, without fear of "causing the worse of the two" to win
- Pretending a spoiler candidate has a chance of winning and getting zero percent of what you want doesn't make you more moral than the people who vote for the furthest left candidate with the ability to win and getting 5% of what you wanted.
  
  We have an obligation and a moral duty to fight fascism at the ballot box. Voting for a fascists' spoiler because the spoiler pretends they are on your side is not strength on your part, it is cowardice.
  
  We have an obligation and a moral duty to fight fascism at the ballot box
  
  Nah the whole thing is a joke. The Dems are corrupt but the Republicans are worse, so I feel a moral obligation to support neither.
  
  If you admit that Republicans are worse, than you have to admit that voting for spoiler candidates who help elected Republicans is the worse option than just voting democratic.
  
  You can't admit that Republicans are worse than use what little political capital you have to help them while pretending you are more moral than those of us who vote democratic.
  
  You are just sniffing your own farts and pretending you are better than those of us who you leave behind to actually make the decision to help as many we are given the ability to.
  
  Your point would make a lot more sense if the continuous "Dems vs Republicans" for decades didn't bring us to this point. But alas, we're in a bad spot where "this election" is the "most important" one yet. Yeah right lmao. Cya at the ballet box
  
  No, you won't see me at the ballot box. You will be getting high off the false morality injection voting for some dingbat gives you, while I will be trying to prevent a fascist with intentions of being a day one dictator from taking power.
  
  There's a few situations
  
  You like the current duopoly, perpetually vote Dems and accept Republicans will take office some terms
  
  You don't like the current duopoly, vote third party, and accept you're helping Republicans take office this term
  
  If Republicans getting into office a few more terms means "the end of democracy" or "the end of X rights", democracy and x rights are already on their way out. If more people voting third party makes the dems push for ranked voting or adopt policies that will solve the perpetual voting issue, then that lays the groundwork for a democratic future.
  
  See you at the ballot box.
  
  If you think doing your part to make sure a fascist gets elected will gain you ranked choice voting, you are naive.
  
  I don't believe you are that naive, nor do I believe you truly think that.
  
  I think statements like that probably sound believable to 18 year old communists who haven't learned the word discernment yet.
  
  There is a word for people who themselves are not fascist but regardless work to install fascism under the belief that they will personally benefit from it (as you do with thinking fascism is necessary to gain ranked choice).
  
  That word is "fascist."
- So you’re the kind of person staring at a forest but all you can make out is a tree. I do imagine that kind of willful ignorance helps to comfort you. The reality is the best you will ever influence, while feigning ignorance to how things actually work, is a tree. Maybe one day you will open your eyes and recognize the potential influence for change you could have harnessed if your kind attempted to constructively change things within the constraints we were born into rather than cutting off the face of your allies while being or feigning ignorance in reality.
  
  Nah I'm the kind of person who realizes a constant vote for the "lesser evil" is a slow slip into facism, and I would rather rip off the bandaid instead.
  
  Nah I’m the kind of person who realizes a constant vote for the “lesser evil” is a slow slip into facism, and I would rather rip off the bandaid instead.
  
  "I want fascism as fast as possible" is a hell of a take, but one that seems frighteningly common amongst .ml users.
Permanently Deleted
- I didn't realize putting Marx in your name entitled you to the ability of gatekeeping socialism from everybody who doesn't live in your imaginary socialist world and instead have to deal with the political realities of the system they are operating in.
  
  Permanently Deleted
  
  I don't support capitalism.
  
  I live in a capitalist world and currently only have a choice between capitalism that can be negotiated with, or full blown fascist flavored capitalism.
  
  If you hate liberalism more than you do fascism, you aren't a socialist.
  
  Permanently Deleted
  
  I am confused because Trump made the comment regarding committing murder on 5th Avenue as explanation of his cult's loyalty, but you are claiming that is a Biden thing. I'm also unsure of the relevance, seeing that Biden isn't one of the two choices you are being given to elected as your next president...
  
  I'm regards to Palestine, there are two options: the democrats and working towards a peace deal, or Trump, who wants to finish the job of eradicating Palestinians. Voting for anybody but Harris is a vote for total eradication in this case, and I'm not going to let you pretend that isn't the case if we are to continue this dialog.