Rise in DNA tests being used to claim citizenship of other countries
Rise in DNA tests being used to claim citizenship of other countries
Many people want to uncover their ancestry, but – driven by Brexit – others also hope to regain access to the EU
Some do it to explore their ancestral heritage or an unknown part of their identity. Others are hoping to find parents, siblings and new relatives.
More than 40 million people worldwide are thought to have tested their DNA ancestry via companies such as Ancestry, 23andMe and MyHeritage since the first genetic genealogy test was offered to the public in 2000.
Now, people are using their test results in a new way – to apply for citizenship in other countries, DNA experts say.
Prof Turi King, director of the Milner Centre for Evolution at Bath University, said: “The more people take tests and the more people find out their ancestry and who their biological parents are, the more they can use that evidence to get citizenship of a particular country.”
King, who also presents the BBC show DNA Family Secrets, thinks ancestry DNA testing will become an easy and more widespread way for some Britons to gain dual citizenship in the future. “This will only grow,” she said.
imagine if your entire state could be proven to be invaders. Theres a reason Israel outlawed DNA tests!
https://lawbuffers.com/index.php/2023/11/22/is-it-illegal-to-do-a-dna-test-in-israel/
The same would go for the US. The amount of native Americans is rather small. There's a lot going wrong in Israel right now, but not being able to sell your genetic information to for-profit companies is quite low on that list imo.
They outlawed private DNA testing. As the article you linked to points out and explains.
This law was designed to protect the privacy and dignity of individuals and their families from the misuse of genetic information. According to this law, it is illegal to use a direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing kit in Israel, unless you have a court order or a special permission from the Ministry of Health.
The law does not apply to all types of genetic testing
Another possibility is to use a DNA testing service that is authorized by the Israeli Ministry of Health
And there's plenty of research that shows all Jews share a common genetic lineage to other groups in the middle east like Syrians and Lebanese.
One example: Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypesid be willing to bet people like https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/yaakov-fauci-israeli-settler-new-york-sheikh-jarrah are less so much jewish and more brown coats recruited to cleanse the land https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung
https://aeon.co/ideas/how-dna-traced-the-ashkenazic-jews-to-northeastern-turkey
Jewish women or mtdna (the ones that jewishness is derived from) are European and jewish culture comes from traders on the silk road who first settled in Turkey!
ydna is a weird way to try to claim jewishness!
also immigration policies are pretty lax
The Law of Return (Hebrew: חוק השבות, ḥok ha-shvūt) is an Israeli law, passed on 5 July 1950, which gives Jews, people with one or more Jewish grandparent, and their spouses the right to relocate to Israel and acquire Israeli citizenship.[1] Section 1 of the Law of Return declares that "every Jew has the right to come to this country as an oleh [immigrant]". In the Law of Return, the State of Israel gave effect to the Zionist movement's "credo" which called for the establishment of Israel as a Jewish state. In 1970, the right of entry and settlement was extended to people with at least one Jewish grandparent and a person who is married to a Jew, whether or not they are considered Jewish under Orthodox interpretations of Jewish law.[2]
Everyone knows the son inherits the sins of the father.
As an adopted person, I did 23andme and a couple others over a decade ago. With a lot of online resources and good advice and friendly DNA cousins (some of whom I'm still in contact with), I was able to triangulate my birth family. Assuming that rumors of a surprise cousin in Texas didn't actually cause all the relatives who've tested since to do so, it would be way easier to track it down today than it was then, when 3rd-cousin-ish was as good as I had available.
I might be eligible for a couple of passports from the paternal side (interesting family story), but it would require actually getting my obviously alcoholic and possibly mentally ill bio-father to acknowledge me and that he was never located to sign over any rights in the 70s. I've already got one dysfunctional dad, and while I'm very firmly convinced that 99.9% of adoptees should be allowed to who their birth family is, beyond that we have to deal with the same shit everybody else does, including people who want no-contact, so my motivation to follow this up has been limited.
I was able to find enough straightforward records to help my wife and kiddo get Luxembourg citizenship. I did the research, and an immigration firm retained by her employer did the actual paperwork. I should be able to tag along with them if the shit hits the fan here in the States, which is nice. :-)
I may fall under the same criteria for Luxembourgish citizenship, all male lineage back to Luxembourg. How was the process, and how long did it take? I'm considering going through LACS for the paperwork.
Like I said, I didn't do the actual paperwork, but it seemed intentionally thorough, maybe even verging on onerous, but not like they were trying to trick you. We did have to find every single birth or death or marriage certificate along the way, eventually landing on an actual Luxembourgish record matching the name and timeframe pretty closely, and because it was through a female line, she had to physically go to Luxembourg (she has trips to Amsterdam from time to time, so it wasn't too bad). The whole process took a few months IIRC, and involved lots of emails, letters, and checks to various counties in Minnesota and North Dakota.
The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Guardian:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
The guy who runs this site, Dave Van Zandt has no idea what he's doing. Media Bias Fact Check puts The Guardian and Breitbart in the same (Factual Reporting: MIXED) category of credibility. Apparently this is because they both have articles where the facts are contested. This ignores the difference in size of the two news sources' publication rate, the number of articles contested, and the seriousness and type of errors.
Lemmy.World loses credibility every day this bot continues to operate.