In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada's defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.
BadEmpada is like Mao in that he has some good takes and bad takes. He is unlike Mao in that Mao wasn't a youtube.
Personally I will say that I think we should go further and work towards a good empanada.
edit: Tone clarifier, I am doing a bit. If you actually believe I would believe this, then I am a teeny bit saddened. My actual opinions are much dumber.
BadEmpadanus is like Lysenko in that he has two good takes and the rest are all bad. He is unlike Lysenko in that Lysenko wasn't a thinly-veiled fascist who intentionally decided to help further colonize Argentina.
Personally I will say that I think we should go further and work towards fewer empanadas as they are not a significant part of a healthy diet.
Let's compromise and agree he is kinda like Kropotkin because they both have names that are kind of funny, and that you can have a good empanada once in a while, as a treat
"wwwwHAT'S UP YOUTUBE!!! YOU KNOW WHO IT IS, IT'S YA BOI ZAZA_DONG COMING BACK AT YOU WITH ANOTHER VIDEO! EVERY TUESDAY THURSDAY AND SATURDAY, YOU ALREADY KNOW WHAT IT IS. AND DON'T FORGET TO SMASH THAT LIKE BUTTON AND HIT SUBSCRIBE, TAKING THAT GREAT LEAP FORWARD TO GET ONE MAOLLION FOLLOWERS. ALRIGHT NOW THAT THE INTRO'S OVER LET'S GET IT!!! TODAY WE'RE PLAYING THE DICKSUCKING MOD IN MINECRAFT"
Not an argument. And since we are obviously having a very serious debate about a very serious topic, I would like for you to concede your position and admit that the only difference is that Mao wasn't an influencer
I am very serious, the only difference really is that Mao isn't a youtube. Time will tell wether BadEmpada, the modern day philosopher that he is, will have any actual influence on this world and we were right to care about him or if he was just another way to get my brain to give me sweet dopamine by arguing with people online.