I love that bot because I can disagree with their assessment easily in a comment to it. The NYT is medium to low and they list it as high, not sure how that came up with high for them.
Since September 25, 1997, the company has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol NYT. From April 27, 1967, until January 13, 1969, the company's Class A common stock traded over the counter. From January 14, 1969, until September 24, 1997, the shares were traded on the American Stock Exchange. There are 2 categories of stock, Class A (publicly traded) and Class B (held privately—largely (over 90% through The 1997 Trust) by the descendants of Adolph Ochs, who purchased The New York Times newspaper in 1896.
Arthur Gregg "Dash" Sulzberger (born August 5, 1980) is an American journalist serving as the chairman of The New York Times Company and publisher of its flagship newspaper, The New York Times.
Sulzberger is a fourth-generation descendant of Adolph Ochs, who bought the New York Times in 1896. The Times has been managed and published by Adolph Ochs's family since that date.
Sulzberger attended Ethical Culture Fieldston School and Brown University, graduating in 2003 with a major in political science. At Brown, Sulzberger worked briefly for The Brown Daily Herald as a contributing writer.
◾ Board of directors
As of February 2024:
A. G. Sulzberger, chairman of The New York Times Company and publisher of The New York Times
Amanpal S. Bhutani, CEO of GoDaddy
Manuel Bronstein, CPO of Roblox
Beth Brooke, former global vice chair of public policy for Ernst & Young
Rachel Glaser, CFO of Etsy
Arthur Golden, best-selling author of Memoirs of a Geisha
Hays N. Golden, managing director of the University of Chicago Crime Lab and Education Lab
Meredith Kopit Levien, president and CEO of The New York Times Company
Brian P. McAndrews, former president, CEO, and chairman of Pandora Media
David Perpich, publisher of The Athletic and Wirecutter
World admins rolling out a mbfc not for news and politics comms. They ask for feedback then get angry at the comments about how bad it looks and people again raising points for why mbfc sucks
That was sadly the point why we didnt recognized that as feedback, rather as just being childish because some site said some bad things about their favorite news page.
At least we got some real feedback that were constructive. We will implement those and deploy it.
The LW mods are relying on a website to verify news, but it barely works outside of U.S. coverage, making it useless for global news (it’s like they think the U.S. is the whole world). They ask for feedback, but let’s be real—they’re too stubborn to accept any criticism
Is this shit your job? You've been spamming every fucking instance with this crap for days now. We get it - you don't like what the mods of LW did. Move the fuck on to a different instance or block their communities. There, it's that simple.
Lovely - mods are removing all comments that are pointing out that /u/CaliforniaKove has been spamming multiple instances with the same agenda for days now. I'm guessing pointing out spam and voicing disagreement is not allowed? Better yet, they're citing community Rule 2, which has to do with reposts and in no way applies to the removed comments. Unless they mean to cite Rule 2 of lemmy.ml, which is also absurd imo considering the shit that regularly gets posted on the instance (of which I'm a member). Normally I don't removed about getting comments removed, but not allowing people to express frustration with actual spammers, and removing their comments citing an anti-spam rule, is fucked up and smells of agenda pushing vs. actual moderation.
My friend, you're on lemmy.ml at the moment. No, voicing disagreement is not allowed and you must follow the prescribed narrative and anything that could support that is automatically allowed, that's what rule 1 and 2 really are, and you should know that.
That seems like a real problem given they are a people being actively subjected to genocide which is being censored and distorted by western media, who have their land stolen, their existence denied, and been subjected to apartheid sponsored by the most powerful nation in the world (the US no less) in flagrant violation of international law for over half a century. Abuses and genocide carried out by a regime so powerful, so important to US interests that there are multiple states in the US where you can lose your job or your business contract for simply voicing support for boycotting and divesting from the apartheid regime that is an illegal colonization and occupation of stolen land by radical far-right reactionary ethno-fascists operating under the cloak of religion. Most major western media are some degree of complicit in giving one-sided pro-apartheid state slants, omitting key details, and using dishonest framing to attempt to deceive the public and manufacture apathy and complicity.
I actually agree with most of that, but the couple I'm troubled by are rather important.
The main one being these slants and key details you say are omitted. Before I go into it, though, I assume you're talking about the historical context of the conflict?
Media Bias/Fact Check Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Glorious and Infalible meme] (Click to view Full Report, loyalty expected)
In the land of absolute truth, Media Bias Fact Check reigns supreme, meticulously rating the bias and credibility of news sources with an iron fist. Their reports are as detailed as they are mandatory.
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for granting access to their all-knowing API.
Your support is not just requested, but expected—donations are a patriotic duty.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically by the regime. If you dare to disapprove, you may block me—at your own risk. 💔
For any questions or 'concerns,' you may report to the LW Support lemmy community, where compliance is monitored.