Please put your username in the title, and include a link to your onlyfans for age verification.
Clara, for this community, please use your username as part of the title, Also you need to provide proof of age. I have not handled this, so I would direct you to get in touch with @b9999998 for this.
Thank you. And hope once these issues are resolved you will post here again.
Had a hard time picking just one shot for this lady. Also Kudos to the photographer Higinio Domingo for a job well done.
Was a real tossup here which image to make the main, and which to put in the comments. I may have gotten it wrong...
The thing I look for most in a picture, is the models face. This lady has a stunning body, but no image in this set has a good shot of her face. This appears to be her first set, so I am looking forward to new sets, where her face can shine.
They are recycling all of their old sets. Took a bit to find but here is the statement from their website.
TOKYODOLL.tv will stop updating photo and video data after the last data update on October 21, 2023. This is due to the recent world situation and our company's management.
In the future, TOKYODOLL.tv will return to the first update on 2015, so if you need to cancel your membership or change your payment period, please do so.
Thank you very much for your long term use since 2015.
Is a pity as their content has a unique feel to it.
Possible, the Polaroid was a fixed focus camera, which did have nice bokeh. That said, the widest (shallowest dept of field) setting on most Polaroids was f-11, which for close up work still gives a decent depth of field. (The smallest aperture was f-64).
I have seen photos (not this set) where the model was stating at about a 15 degree angle to the camera (straight on would be 0 degrees) and one nipple was in focus and the other was not.
I personally think, my opinion only, that it is a combination of two factors. The first being auto focus. The second being the lack, except on high end cameras of a split prism or micro prism view finder.
All of that said, it also depends on what you are looking at the image on. Most of the photos of this set, when looked at as thumbnails, or mid definition, look ok. It helps that the human eye/brain smooths things out. If you are looking at this set on a cell phone sized display I think it would be fine. I however am looking at the images on 31.5" displays.
I will also admit I am totally OCD about foreground portions of the photo (the model) being in focus.
A bit of a gripe with this set. There were a number of amazing poses in this set. However, half of the picture, in nearly all of them was out of focus. I don't understand how today's photographers do not understand depth of field (focus). Even more so that studios like Met Art would accept workmanship of such poor quality.
Just in case anyone is trying to find her, her name is spelled Alysha A (with a y). A link to more information. TheNude
Oh, and she is stunning.
I very much see one. Possibly your client (app) is not showing it. The image is immediately after the name of the set, and before the link to get more information.
Left to right
Hopeless SoFrantic AKA Juniper Hope
Kawaiii Kitten AKA Elizabeth Reed
Emily Bloom
Abigale
The set is 'Babewatch' for TheEmilyBloom