For some people, it's the convenience with pirating. It's easier to pirate a movie from a go-to piracy website that you use than to find in which of the 50 different streaming sites the movie is available.
If the source is already in text (perfectly accessible), why should we make an image out of it? That's like saying let's email a document, but instead of the original doc file, let's print them out, scan, and then send the pdf of those images instead.
That is not a correct analogy because printing and scanning a document is less convenient than just forwarding the email. But here, most people are comfortable taking a ss and share it. That's what they're learnt. So they keep doing that.
My man, you just don't know how crappy OCR can be with non-latin alphabet writing systems, especially Chinese characters.
That's why the OCR tools have to be improved. They should atleast be able to read the top 10 most used fonts in a language without issues.
Accessibility should be enhanced to read text from image. Enduser shouldn't care about how he should share an information. How hard is it to read a font from a text?
I tried your command and got the tutorial program and I gotta say that this is the best tutorial program I've ever seen. Now I wonder why other OSes don't do that
Yes, if you fuck once annually