Pangaea is only the most recent supercontinent, and therefore the most known. there are believed to be several more iterations in this cycle of combining and breaking up large landmasses.
If the grass looks greener on the other side it's probably being well fertilized.
another female politician that resembles lewis capaldi
this same AG is suing new York for prosecuting trump alleging ejection interference. he's a real piece of work
Hearthstone. couldn't keep up with new cards and it's more fun to watch other people lose.
I had to upgrade my pfsense hardware when I got fiber several years ago, which was in a similar situation as yours. The CPU just couldn't handle the connection table.
personally i still use a few squares of tp and just blot dry and flush it
They're great but I can't stand bale's Batman voice. so annoying
I saw Crimes of the Future recently and though it's not as disturbing as some others mentioned here it did keep me saying wtf quite a lot.
I use Roman deities. My recent Beelink purchase received the name Mellona. I thought it was fitting. Others have no relevance, just random, like Pluto, Juno, Jupiter, Neptune... double fun for them being space objects as well.
My current setup is in two rooms. These rooms are connected via a TL-SG108E switch in one room (Room A) and a SG300-10 switch in the other (Room B). I have two WANs, one in each room. The primary WAN (fiber) is in Room A. The pfSense is in Room B. I have two VLANs set up, one for WAN and one for LAN. There are LAN devices in both rooms. The traffic is tagged so that the WAN traffic goes only to the pfSense and any LAN traffic is then separated as well, but using the same connection between the switches. All connections are 1 Gbps except for a few individual devices that don't support it that are irrelevant to this issue.
I have an OpenVPN interface set up in pfSense over WAN B. A device in Room A uses this connection exclusively via pfSense rules that force traffic from that device IP to use the VPN gateway and blocks when the gateway is down. Even though I've limited the bandwidth to 10 Mbps and connections to 1000, and WAN A is 1 Gbps and WAN B is 450 Mbps, whenever the VPN connection is being used it negatively affects my normal WAN A traffic.
I don't know for sure but I'm guessing this is some kind of issue with the connection between the two switches. Are there any settings or configuration changes I can make to alleviate the strain or prioritize my normal LAN traffic to make the VPN secondary? Would another physical setup work better? I was considering potentially moving the pfSense box to Room A, but my primary device is in Room B as well. If there's any more information that might be useful please ask.