sparkle @ sparkle @lemm.ee Posts 1Comments 533Joined 1 yr. ago
Pray tell, which of the instances have you spotted that are less leftist than lemmy.world? The only ones I can imagine are lemmy.ca and lemmy.midwest, but that's just a guess.
Also what do you mean by "new left" movement? There are a lot of left movements, but not really any that I can think of that diverge greatly from previous left movements.
"Woke" doesn't mean anything. It's a vague, catch-all term used by chuds, for "lefties" and people who want social equality usually, which is obviously not a bad thing, so you must not be using it in that sense.
Wow, your reasoning is uh... well it sure is interesting... can't say I see where you're coming from.
Clearly your reading comprehension is kaputt because I gave simple "no" answers for your "question". It's even bolded for your viewing pleasure. Shan't you appreciate my immaculate formatting?
one word answer
Nah that's not how the world works buddy. Only children think in binaries.
okay, just one question: do furries/does furry porn sexualize animals, yes or no? No mental gymnastics allowed, one word answer.
You asked two questions and tell me to give you one answer. Nice try senator.
Also a majority of things require answers more complex than a simple "yes" or "no", because the world isn't the simple land that it seems to be in your head. However, luckily for you, these questions do have relatively simple yes-or-no answers.
To your first question: No, furries don't by default sexualize animals. It's weird that you even come to the conclusion that they do.
To your second question: Also no. You can argue that furry art is usually depictions of animals, and that furry porn sexualizes those depictions, but even that's pretty shaky because anthropromorphized beings that have a vague resemblance to animals are hard to argue as being similar enough to the real thing that it's "sexualizing (a depiction of) [animal]". I wouldn't call you out on saying that furry drawings are depictions of animals, even though I think that's flawed logic, but it's not even remotely similar to "sexualizing animals" (e.g. zoophilia)
also this
Unluckily for you, my friend, I took a screenshot when you posted that since I had a feeling you would edit your mistake out. You may be playing chess in 4 dimensions, but I'm playing chess in 7 dimensions. Get pranked lol
- You read text, you don't listen to it
- You must have come from 10 years ago because nobody has opinions as cringe and childish as "furries bad zoophiles" anymore
Defederate them for having a different political worldview? Defederation is supposed to be for extreme circumstances. There's not a problem that .ml communities cause of people breaking the rules here. I'm not saying there aren't toxic people from lemmy.ml or lemmygrad.ml, there definitely are, but there's nothing to justify defederation.
If instances just start defederating other instances for hosting a lot of communists then the platform's gonna fall apart lol.
You can block instances if you don't like them. You don't have to decide what the best experience for all us other lemm.ee users is.
Animal fetishists?! You mean... furries?
Well, its small mass certainly contributed to it losing heat more efficiently. But Mercury (much less massive than Mars) and Ganymede (around the same mass as Mars) both have a magnetic field, so there are a lot of other factors at play. Something to do with a change in the chemical composition of Mars' mantle, and the possible lack of plate tectonics, I'm not so familiar with the causes though.
Venus was habitable (with vast oceans, plate tectonics, soil and everything) for 3 billion years (almost 70% of its history!), until about 700 million years ago... it stopped being habitable because of Jupiter.
Between 700 and 750 million years ago, a near-global resurfacing event triggered the release of carbon dioxide from rock on the planet, which transformed its climate. In addition, according to a study from researchers at the University of California, Riverside, Venus would be able to support life if Jupiter had not altered its orbit around the Sun.
Considering there's a good chance Jupiter obliterated our next door neighbours, an entire planet of organisms... yea it's not as nice as it seems
Oh well. Mars was also habitable for a few hundred million years – in fact, the river beds and remnants of the Martian oceans are still very clearly visible on 2/3 of the surface, even after 4 billion years, and NASA is on a mission to bring fossils of ancient Martian life back to Earth, if there are any. But all of its atmosphere leaked out into space because its dynamo (magnetic field generation) abruptly disappeared so... skill issue lol. One of the many possible contributing factors to that happening is that giant impacts during that period of time overheated its mantle which fucked up global heat flow & convection near the core so... Jupiter's fault again?
Can you be homosexual with him tho?
What the hell is "woke"? Isn't that just normal?
Violence solves all of our problems
Airbnb
You heard this and didn't immediately request for them to step up to the guillotine? Are you even a Lemmy user?
they'll be fine. we won't be though
Are you just posting this under every comment? This isn't even a fraction as bad as the Intel CPU issue. Something tells me you have Intel hardware...
AMD CPUs indeed have better efficiency when it comes to energy used, or so I always hear.
Capitalism: "Make as much as possible as fast as possible"
These aren't "broad sweeping statements". It's just the facts of the matter man. I don't have any interest in portraying women as pure and unable to have disgusting beliefs, or portraying men as inherently worse in some way. I'm just pointing out the most likely scenario based on the countless examples of the exact same thing happening on Twitter. It's not jumping through hoops to conclude that "yeah a lot of dudes tapped option C instead of option A/B". There's no reason for them not to.
I'm ignoring the nuance you say? I literally gave you the entire context surrounding Twitter and gender's role in acceptance of child marriage. I provided the nuance for you. It's not exactly a conspiracy theory when there are tons of studies and evidence showing 1. Twitter polls are extremely easy to manipulate 2. Twitter polls involving controversial or fringe topics are often heavily brigaded/manipulated. Your position is completely unnuanced because it's just "the Twitter poll says it so it must be true", flying in the face of any and all context.
Just to be clear, you think that most people answer political or controversial/fringe Twitter polls honestly? And you think that Twitter doesn't have a rampant problem with bad actors & social manipulation by people with a narrative to push? Or do you think that just doesn't apply to this poll in particular for no specific reason?