I would say he’s going to look stupid when she wins and that doesn’t happen, but there is no lower place for him to go.
Victory is when you’re too stupid to understand that you’re incorrect.
“This website is sketchy because it’s not in English (it’s reporting on Ukrainian affairs)” — a genuis
You’re replying to me for free, so… the only difference is you’re wrong.
I hope you actually think I’m getting paid to talk to you. So fucking stupid.
If what I said wasn’t correct you’d be able to come up with a better reply. The Russian bot stuff is reddit nonsense and makes you look like an idiot. As for “shady websites,” I only linked one website, and is it shady to you because it’s not in English? It’s a Ukrainian news source.
I don't think he's personally said anything about trans people but China has been improving wrt trans rights and most of the things reported on as "anti-LGBTQ+ crackdowns" in China have been nonsense.
Thought-terminating cliche. Congrats on lapping up propaganda for free?
Umm, wow, okay friend, these completely correct statements are actually RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA (they make Ukraine look bad). Amazing bit. Yes, not putting out public statements in favor of Israel's genocidal campaign would really hurt their war effort against Russia. Nor could Ukraine afford to stamp out all of the Nazism in their country (they actually let it rise to new heights after Euromaidan, when Russian influence had supposedly been weakened) or end their ethnic cleansing campaign in the Donbas or else that would take attention away from the invasion that wouldn't start for eight years.
Calling the Russian army genocidal is actually beyond absurd. Why do you think Russia invaded Ukraine? Because "Putler wanted to conquer Europe"? The liberal worldview has absolutely zero explanatory power.
You're right, Ukraine can openly venerate Nazis while targeting Russian speakers and Roma people and Israel can massacre Palestinians at the same time!
It's not that two things are happening at the same time you idiot, it's Zelensky's attitude towards what Israel is doing at the same time (this is what the comment above expressly states). "Israel has a right to defend itself" is the vapid nonsense numerous Western powers have said to justify Israel's genocide against the Palestinian people after their revolt against colonial occupation (which is condemned as "terrorism"), along with the "Israeli civilians" drivel and the refusal to recognize Israel's part in killing their own people on the 7th—these are the same things Zelensky has said [1] [2].
Respectable sources (say, historian Timothy Snyder) say that Ukrainian citizens (not the US) kicked out the president who faked election results
Timothy Snyder (respectable Nazi historical revisionist) and Wikipedia disagree with them? Excellent fact checking.
Here’s a good article on the issue.
I don't think you can justifiably call a request for surrender a request for de-escalation. Russia could stop shooting, get out of UA, and the war would end.
Why do you think Russia invaded Ukraine?
I tried to talk to it about Tiananmen and it was awful. It just went over the average AI drivel of “there are a variety of perspectives” and “independent human rights organizations agree,” etc. It asked me for sources but in its responses it was very clear it didn’t actually have info on some of their contents for some reason and just replied with “yes this agrees with you but there are other things I can’t name specifically that disagree with you.” Also in typical AI fashion many of its sentences were plagiarized from online articles, one even coming from PBS/RFA.
People described a wide range of beliefs, including theories that the moon landing had been staged, that Covid-19 had been created by humans to shrink the population and that President John F. Kennedy had been killed by the Central Intelligence Agency.
One of these things is not like the others!
It’s impossible to be this stupid. He quotes Bin Laden’s letter to support his point but says that “he did quite literally hate Americans because they could vote and had freedoms,” a claim which is impossible to make after reading the letter:
Free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom. If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike Sweden, for example.
Nobody is running defense for Bin Laden, and Ethan is correct that he was antisemitic; but it’s him who rewrites history when he leaves out the reason of American imperialism, which is expressly stated. God what an idiot.
The Chinese govt sharing x website’s articles because they support their POV is proof of BIAS and PROPAGANDA LAUNDERING. The American govt.’s “news source” that is expressly propaganda for US hegemony is HIGHLY FACTUAL (we know because they said so) and only SLIGHTLY LEANS TO THE LEFT.
“For example, the article [‘Nazi genocide against Jewish population’] is emotionally loaded and one-sided against the [German] government due to its use of highly charged language and its singular focus on alleged atrocities committed by [the Nazis] without providing context or perspectives from the [German] side.” So on and so forth.
Wondrous!
Erm HRW (not a biased Western NGO) made a report (deconstructed by Norman Finkelstein) that weakly suggests this POV. No we will not include any evidence that suggests Israel is responsible, such as them bombing the cancer ward of that same hospital days earlier, an IOF spokesman cheering on the bombing as attacking Hamas, Israel misrepresenting Al Jazeera footage and their own as well, faking phone calls and video, etc. It’s clear from scale alone and the pattern of bombing hospitals that Israel was responsible, and this is where fence-sitting becomes absurd.
This is true, but I don’t like that it’s ranking my sources low because it’s doing it dishonestly.
The rights of stupid users must be protected by MBFC, which clearly tells people that the CIA is trustworthy and unbiased (whereas anti-imperialist sources get seventeen Pinocchios because freedomrifle.com fact checked them and found that they contradicted sources they liked in an endless cycle and their claims supported the Bad Country^TM) so there is no confusion. This can be very helpful to stop people from seeing OBVIOUS PROPOGANDA.
I found a particularly egregious case of MBFC lies here:
The article they link that shows Electronic Intifada “failed a fact check” is fact checking a single person’s tweet, which references a video, and the article mentions EI only once in the main body, namely it’s linked as an article shared by the tweeter to PolitiFact in email correspondence to support his claim that the IOF killed Israeli concert goers, but this is dismissed by PF since:
The information he sent did not include or appear to mention the video footage he shared on X.
And the context he gave for the video footage is all that’s being ”fact checked”. The original fact checking article linked clearly says EI’s article had nothing to do with the footage he shared. But since EI’s article is included in their sources, and an idiotic reading of the title seems to say that PF is saying Israel didn’t shoot its own concert goers period and no footage shows that they did (this may be intentional), EI has been DEBUNKED. Liberal scripture!
Oh and their rating system is completely arbitrary (cover for liberal end of history-ism).
robinnist [he/him] @hexbear.net “the oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class shall represent and repress them!”