You don't agree with most aspects of reality.
With only the context of Tyson’s video, I felt it was douchey.
Any honest, relevant response to Terrence Howard would be interpreted by someone as douchey.
During the gay marriage debate in Canada people were actually arguing that marriage equality already exists, since everyone gay or straight cannot marry people of the same sex, and therefore gay marriage is a special privilege and not equality.
When someone is motivated enough, they can come up with all manner of reasoning in bad faith and not serving justice in any meaningful way, and when they come up with something like this they do nothing but marvel at their own perceived cleverness.
If you're sincere, you're an idiot. So I hope you're lying.
Remind me why it's legal for a foreign government to fund election campaigns in the U.S. against it's critics?
Because in this case there are people that will call you antisemitic for even noticing that it's happening.
Why? We get to tell the truth and apparently deeply bother you all at once. Seems like a win-win for everyone but you , and you don't matter.
That will never fly with the public , especially since one of the "normal" conditions is giving up the pound, joining the Euro, and giving up direct control of their monetary policy. There is no way a majority would support that in the UK . None of these polls will even bother asking something like that. The polls are about whether they want to turn back time to before Brexit, which is somewhat interesting but isn't possible.
Talking about it hypothetically is a cop out.
It’s clear from the paper that Terence has no idea what the process of a peer review is, so maybe start by educating him on that.
By assuming he doesn't know what peer review is (something anyone can google) you have guaranteed that someone will find your response douchey. By not giving a peer review you have also been dismissive.
Isn't the Smartmatic lawsuit still in play? That one has the potential to be even bigger.
Cool. Give us one for Terry here.
Cool. Give us one for Terry here.
Cool, give us one for Terry here.
Life has a carbon impact. Forcing this burden disproportionately on athletes while spectators (not to mention corrupt IOC officials) enjoy hotels with AC is ridiculous.
I don't think they can. Once a centipede is of decent size I think it's much stronger than the average house Spider. Australia notwithstanding.
The emissions from ACs for 2 weeks likely isn't close to the emissions from all the construction they did just to host . The whole thing is ridiculous. The corrupt IOC officials watching from box seats and staying in 5 star hotels are all going to have AC.
Sure. Just not while remaining honest and on topic.
He should have treated it like an amateur that needs encouragement not a colleague that needs the hard truth.
There is no way of saying "your fundamental method of understanding the world is faulty" in a way that someone won't describe as "douchey".
Instead, they said Biden has noted, Obama publicly admonished Israel’s actions and voiced concern for Palestinian civilian deaths early into the 2014 conflict. As a result, Biden has argued, Obama squandered any ability to influence the Israeli government as it invaded Gaza, said the people familiar with his comments.
And actual material support was affected how?
Now, I don't want to find something for every president, and I already explained why trump is uniquely unreliable in pretty much every possible way.
You definitely didn't. American support for Israel is so well entrenched that is has actual strategic depth. That includes ensuring that the political path of least resistance is to support Israel absolutely, so Trump does. It's just easiest. All you've done is look at words with no actual action behind them . All material support has remained completely stable.