Vitameatavegamin episode, classic
Only the longest line had its count recorded. Think that was a coincidence?
Kids love counting the letters in long words.
Vanilla Coke Zero Sugar is my caffeinated soda of choice. It's pretty good!
They did switch from sugar to HFCS at one point. The "zero sugar" line is better.
Bog Humbug, Liliana's Mastery and Topdeck the Halls would all be great as playmats
If someone doesn't specify, they mean TOS, clearly
Sock yarn?
That stuff in the pic is much too thick for socks
Pretty sure this was made as-seen OR photoshopped, not dyed.
Curses aren't Innistrad-specific. Amonkhet has some very flavorful ones.
I figured the former, but I am a poly person who knows poly ren faire people.
I was wondering what rating such a creature would get from the Council of Colors.
Sounds like a fun job.
I wonder what rating a black/green flying vigilance would get.
It seems to be an illustration of anthropomorphic animals in a tavern setting.
I love this kind of community in theory, because I love learning about how things work, but I don't love the posts asking for creature identification. Those are less how things work and more "I need an expert on this geologic region's fauna" so they seem like completely different topics to me.
I don't want to see spiders in my feed, but I'm happy to see curious objects. If I block the community due to the spiders, I miss out on the curious objects.
they could have spared you
That translates to less money in their pockets though
People who buy cards want assurance their cards will remain legal.
The following happened to me no fewer than three times when I played standard:
New card comes out, and seemingly does ok
I don't buy any
Card starts to dominate
I try to play around them
I constantly lose, and cave
I buy a playset
Card is banned
Right, which qualities are those?
Just started today. Possibly related to the recent updates.
Swiping to back out still works, at least for images
v1.0.190
After editing a comment, UI fails to load the next page. Haven't tested if it's only in non-native instances.
Anyway, if I want to review an edit, I have to hit back twice, refresh, then scroll to find my comment again.
Looking at the blown-up thumbnails while waiting for the full-size images to load is pretty uncomfortable for my eyes... they search for detail that isn't there yet, and get strained. If there was an option to just see a spinning wheel or similar, I'd choose it in a heartbeat. Alternatively, displaying the image line by line as it loads (slow scan from top to bottom) would be even better, as it would allow me back out before loading the whole thing.
I just upgraded from a Galaxy J7 to a Pixel 3, which seems to have fixed the following problems:
-
Clicking on my profile shows me someone else's profile
-
Refreshing immediately after changing profiles results in no block list being applied
So, it seems those issues were specific to older hardware.
I am still seeing the issue where trying to save redgifs videos in-app only saves a stub file instead. Though, seeing as redgifs made their videos unsaveable in browsers, maybe this is due to deliberate site shenanigans. Voyager seemingly also can't do this. Though, Voyager doesn't download anything at all, as opposed to Connect's stub files. If the resulting file is non-functional, I think saving nothing would be better, ideally with an error message saying the file could not be saved.
I mentioned this in a comment but I figured it would get lost there.
The recent update means redgifs videos now load (yay) but reveals a new problem: videos cannot be saved in-app. Attempting to do so (with file permissions enabled) instead saves a tiny file with the same name, but none of the data.
As redgifs disallows saving from their site in-browser, this effectively makes redgifs content unsaveable.
Any solution or workaround would be appreciated.
Hello everyone. I recently learned there are a handful of people in my community who engage in non-barriered intercourse by default (sex with multiple partners without condoms).
I try to keep to only one non-barriered partner, to minimize any STI spread that may occur. Though testing is important, there are risks that 1. A test may be wrong, and 2. An infection can be introduced and spread after a successful clean test.
Also, my partner has a history of getting BV if her non-barriered partner(s) have other non-barriered partners. So, we keep it to only one non-barriered partner (for intercourse).
Any thoughts on this? Is it ethical to have more than one? Is it sustainable to only have one?