If you want to play the same game over and over, there are plenty of those.
Live games are for ever-changing environments.
Fallout 76 didn't ruin New Vegas
Ultima online wasn't a "cancer" to the gaming industry
I wish Final Fantasy XIV ruined the franchise so we didn't get the abomination that is the latest two installments.
Greedy shit developers make shit products, no surprise. But GemStone, Asheron's Call, World of Warcraft (the early years, I can't speak to the latest) and other forms of long-term games offer a chance to experience a world for years in an additive environment instead of waiting for the next installment of starting at ground zero again.
Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. Right now we have ceos everywhere just saying "AI" in every statement to sound relevant.
And we already went through this moving from hand-drawn to computer animation.
Different games are made for different people. If you don't find a genre or model fun, their existence doesn't ruin anything for you.
Live service games have been around for decades.
The initialism is decades older than any iDevice. Go complain to people on USENET from before you were born.
I had no idea there was a shopping list app. We've been using Keep for that kind of list and it syncs pretty quick, but no idea about Home.
How many people clicked the phishing links in your college papers?
That's a stupid plan. Who would buy their shit then?
Keep down voting me, but I bet I'm the only one in this thread that's actually played the game.
What part of it is unfinished? Also, it's on game pass, so I paid nothing, and am playing a sequel to a game I love and spent 100s of hours on. Real evil ploy here.
I'm accepting it because I've played another dozen hours of a game I enjoy. CO spent 8 years updating the first game and I expect no less. Paradox isn't some evil publisher, have you even played anything they've released?
Have you tried paying for YouTube premium? Or is there some 3rd definition of can't you wanna make up?
They informed customers so they can make their own decision. I have hardware that allows me to play the game.
I'm playing a developed, finished game. If you don't have hardware that can run it, then wait until it's fixed.
They were open and honest, and I'm not sure why you're so angry with that
Not a deal breaker for me. Runs perfectly fine, except for an occasional hitch when zooming.
As we all know, bathrooms are the correct place for your top secret government documents
It really is a niche entry. It's a weird gameplay mix of real time stealth and then turn-based combat. It's also a weird setting mix of fantasy and noir.
And the turn based gameplay just isn't as fun or deep as XCOM or even gears tactics.
Kudos to paradox for trying something, but I'd rather to they released CS:2 earlier instead
What did you do with all the time you saved typing I've instead of I have?
Lol Artefact. I did forget about that
Which person in this article is afraid of sex? The one who streamed herself having sex on the internet, the one who paid $30 to watch it, or the one in charge who said none of this matters?
Trump denies wrongdoing. He says ... that it didn’t matter what he put on his financial statements because they had a disclaimer that says they shouldn’t be trusted.
🤯
We can try and ignore it until people start dying from rabies because fucktards think the vaccine will make their labridoodle autistic
It disincentives gaining skills that can only earn less than 40k a year.
Intel says it will be dropping the "i" from its processor branding after more than a decade.
![Intel drops ‘i’ processor branding after 15 years, introduces ‘Ultra’ for higher-end chips | Engadget](https://lemdro.id/pictrs/image/dd79c926-d71a-4314-8d10-c4ee589573db.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
There are a few requirements for the new tier.
![Twitch’s new Partner Plus tier outlines what it takes to get a 70 / 30 revenue sharing split](https://lemdro.id/pictrs/image/87b91426-7f83-44ba-8933-901f2bf55049.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
Twitch is introducing a new “Partner Plus” program that will give streamers an increased 70 percent of the share of their subscription revenues — up to the first $100,000 brought in each year — with Twitch taking the other 30 percent.
Most partnered streamers receive 50 percent of their subscription revenues, though Twitch had negotiated 70 / 30 deals with some of the platform’s biggest streamers until last fall when it announced that those deals would eventually get this same $100,000 cut-off. The new program doesn’t seem to change those “premium subscription terms,” but it could give many more streamers access to the higher split