My first reaction was, "her?". But the more I read on (until the paywalled) the more I liked the idea. Her Younger audiences must feel alienated & dejected by the popular discussions on climate change. This could reinvigorate a newer demographic into action instead of apathy/doomerism.
I just wish they don't dwell on "every little helps" BS and hold big corporations & governments responsible to make a change. Not sure if this article mentioned it, its paywalled. 🤷♂️
Yeah take no creative risks get no box office rewards, simple as.
And megalopolis wasn't a risk, Coppola fronted the $120mn so they're going make money on that flop.
Hoback argues
In any case, says Hoback, the identity of the real Satoshi is a matter of public interest. “This person is potentially on track to become the wealthiest on Earth,” says Hoback. “If countries are considering adopting this in their treasuries or making it legal tender, the idea that there's potentially this anonymous figure out there who controls one-twentieth of the total supply of digital gold is pretty important.”
Currently bitcoin or any block chain based currency is more of a grift than financial freedom. However countries like El Salvador have taken it up as official currency, so real lives can be affected by whoever holds that bitcoin stockpile.
We don't spell it like that 😒
Wordle 1,218 X/6
⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩
Well what do you know!
Wordle 1,212 3/6
🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟨🟨⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Also 2 guesses is crazy, OP!
Most definitely. It was purely economic than militaristic. EU companies are generally seen as superior just for being from the EU in Asia.
This is a very insightful comment, thank you. I absolutely agree with most of your points. Though one minor disagreement I'd have: it wasn't Trump who brought on the waning of US soft power, but US's failure in Afghanistan/Iraq/Yemen during 2nd Obama term.
Ultimately the expense in forging the US influence overseas during the Bush era came at the cost of ignoring those back home. Trump capitalized on all that resentment. In fact he still is riding on it. Coinicdentally Its a lesson Modi needs to learn from his recent election result at home too.
Sidestepping the whataboutism of US support of Iserali "invasion", the US/EU soft power is clearly waning in the East. Sanctions are only as effective as long as everyone is willing to comply.
Lol true, but then again if you leak papers about Pentagon's secret program, you'd be Snowden-ed or worse.
I don't think you realize the work involved in integrating a new unreliable power source into the grid. Its a delicate dance to anticipate demand to keep power always available. Having more power than you need is bad for the grid, which is why the costs go negative: power companies want it off the grid ASAP.
Conventional power stations can stay on all the time & that's awesome for the grid stability. There is no power gap renewables are filling. So to turn solar on we need to turn off a coal powered plant. If this new source cannot match the reliability it hinders to grid than help. So there's no question of "turn it off when you don't need it".
We need to turn off fossil fuel power generation for more renewables, sure, but it doesn't alleviate their problems right now.
Ok, but what do you do when you're short of power at night? Keep in mind to turn on conventional power stations it's expensive & time consuming. Once they startup they need to stay on for a long while to be efficient & cheap.
The real solution is to store excess power in batteries. Lithium ion is too expensive to scale, Sodium ion batteries are economically & capacity viable AFAIK.
Spot on! I hoped this comment would be higher! The main problem isn't corps not making money, but grid stability due to unreliability of renewables.
To be fair, the original tweet is kinda shit to begin with. They've unnecessarily assigned monetary value to a purely engineering (physics?) problem.
That's interesting. I'm not going to lament the death of the old studios system. Sure it worked some of the time, but it was mostly bloat. Side benefit of this being, as Stewart points out, people who loved their craft got a chance to get better at it over time.
Instead of cutting the inefficiencies, silicon valley "disrupted" the system, aka undercut existing systems at a loss for the all valuable market share. Now that they're competing with themselves, they're squeezing everyone involved: creatives, technicians & the audience to make their unsustainable business model magically sustainable. The illusion "tech will save us all" is failing, AI & everything-as-a-service is their last hope.
I don't know what the alternative is? Pandoras box is open, we can't go back to the older system anymore.
That is a good point, but I think I'd like to make the distinction of saying LLM's or "generic model" is a garbage concept, which require power & water rivaling a small country to produce incorrect results.
Neural networks in general that can (cheaply) learn on their own for a specific task could be huge! But there's no big money in that, since its not a consolidated general purpose product tech bros can flog to average consumers.
That's an excellent point! Why oh why would a tech bro start a non-profit? Its always been PR.
The firm, NBTC, was established in 1977 and now operates across Kuwait, United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. It provides services linked to engineering and construction, logistics, hotel and retailing.
"I play both sides so I always come on top"